· Private foundation
Amazonsmile Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k363384 grants · $54M
- $10k–50k231 grants · $4.3M
- $50k–250k45 grants · $4.8M
- $250k+13 grants · $9.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $2,295,961 |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS DBA ASPCA | $1,952,046 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $796,243 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC | $758,558 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $754,960 |
| WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC | $613,888 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC | $507,531 |
| BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY | $417,581 |
| CHARITY WATER | $411,879 |
| ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC | $367,251 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC | $280,053 |
| YESHIVAS OHR REUVEN | $275,907 |
| THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $268,729 |
| EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE | $231,859 |
| THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES | $224,854 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $9.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
1984 repeat relationships — 1957 still active in FY2023, 27 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC4× · 2020–2023 · $11M · revenue +78%- TATHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS4× · 2020–2023 · $11M · revenue +37%
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC4× · 2020–2023 · $4.2M · revenue +34%
Funded once
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2020 · $16k
- CRCONGREGATION ROSH HAGIVAH INCone grant, 2022 · $16k
- MMAKE-A-WISHone grant, 2021 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Petconnect rescue is a foster-based animal welfare organization dedicated to saving at-risk dogs and cats, providing them with high quality care, and adopting them to loving homes. we are committed to ensuring a highly positive rescue…
Established in 1974, the organization's mission is to find responsible homes for dogs and cats and to encourage all dog and cat owners to spay and neuter their pets.
Sheltering homeless animals, facilitating adoption, providing low-cost spay/neuter services, and foster care for dogs and cats.
Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.
Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.
To rescue abandoned, neglected and traumatized animals and find these animals their furever homes.
THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…
Animal Dominion Rescue is a non-profit organization dedicated to rescuing cats and dogs worldwide, ensuring they find permanent, loving homes. The organization emphasizes direct support to rescuers on the ground, promoting animal welfare,…
Pet rescue inc. is committed to the rescue of abandoned and abused cats and dogs, and uses funds raised to provide veterinary care, neutering and spaying services, food and a home for these animals.
Our mission is to rescue dogs and cats from animal shelters that may otherwise be euthanized due to time limitations, illness, injuries or lack of socialization and training.
Dedicated to finding life-long loving homes for stray, abandoned and abused animals. The Organization concentrates on networking with other welfare agencies in the county and state to provide a safety net for animals with the least chance…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pet Helpers Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Love Pit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1802 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1802 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds PENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CODEORG ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR PAWS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: The Guenter Borg Foundation · John and Tina Armelagos Family Foundation · Overland Expo Foundation Incorporated · Mullins Family Foundation Inc · Eleanor and Menachem Cohen Family Foundation Inc · Greyhound Adoption Center · Beautiful Balance Inspirations · Forest Family Foundation · Cimerron Council Inc · Wilson Dynasty Foundation Inc · Feat of Louisville Inc · Simon Juliet Foundation Ltd
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Amazonsmile Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Adventist Development & Relief Agency International — 35% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Amazonsmile Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Amazonsmile Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.