Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY

SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY (California) receives grants from 525 organizations whose IRS filings report $351,489,076 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($57,739,504). 310 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$310M
Funders on record
525
Grants received
$351M
Net assets
$297M
310/525 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 25%
01What it does

What Second Harvest of Silicon Valley does

Mission

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. We will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Second Harvest of Silicon Valley (also known as "second harvest") is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization established in 1974 and incorporated in 1979. Second harvest is one of the largest food banks in the nation and a trusted nonprofit leader in ending local hunger. In silicon valley, one of the wealthiest regions in the country, food insecurity is higher than the national average. One in six neighbors relies on second harvest for nutritious food, half of whom are kids and seniors. Inflation and the high cost of housing disproportionately impact neighbors living on fixed incomes or earning lower wages in jobs that keep the community running (such as grocery clerks, bus drivers, teaching assistants and service workers). (continued on schedule o)

    $246,001,907 spentof which $190,926,061 as grants$69,339 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $246,001,907.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($130M) Expenses 100 ($125M) Net assets 100 ($76M)2018 Revenue 97 ($127M) Expenses 99 ($124M) Net assets 104 ($79M)2019 Revenue 104 ($136M) Expenses 104 ($131M) Net assets 112 ($85M)2020 Revenue 165 ($214M) Expenses 139 ($174M) Net assets 164 ($125M)2021 Revenue 247 ($322M) Expenses 223 ($279M) Net assets 237 ($181M)2022 Revenue 240 ($313M) Expenses 215 ($269M) Net assets 270 ($207M)2023 Revenue 220 ($286M) Expenses 223 ($280M) Net assets 289 ($221M)2024 Revenue 239 ($311M) Expenses 235 ($295M) Net assets 320 ($244M)2025 Revenue 238 ($310M) Expenses 209 ($261M) Net assets 389 ($297M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (238)Expenses (209)Net assets (389)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $253M to $321M (+27%).

$80M
$83M
$90M
$136M
$190M
$253M
$242M
$253M
$321M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 7% · 2018 7% · 2019 9% · 2020 11% · 2021 25% · 2022 8% · 2023 8% · 2024 9% · 2025 7%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

97% of SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 40 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$5.2M
’17
$2.8M
’18
$5.1M
’19
$40M
’20
$44M
’21
$43M
’22
$6.6M
’23
$17M
’24
$49M
’25
3.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Leslie Bacho

CEO

Board chair

Maria Poveromo

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed312724242024262524
Joined·+8+6+5+1+5+7+5+3
No longer listed·129551564
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 52 funders to 229 funders, grant income rose $7.5M → $71M.

68 of 525 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 67% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $57k from one payer (the same organization on both sides, largest Second Harvest of Silicon Valley). These are real filings, and they are not money SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY raised.

From the IRS filings of SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 525 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 16% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

76% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY.

16%
largest funder
41%
top three
~13
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 26% · 2018 26% · 2019 31% · 2020 17% · 2021 23% · 2022 16% · 2023 24% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 59% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

67% of SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $115M that is directly attributable, 83% of it comes from California funders.

AK
ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $236M arriving through sponsors registered in 25 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 31 food & nutrition nonprofits its size.

Operating margin16% · top quartile
Months of reserve3.9mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)11% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 31 food & nutrition nonprofits over $100M, FY2025

Organizations like SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 3%Fundraising 3%

Governance

18
board members
94%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 39 states

AK
ME
NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY?
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY (California) receives grants from 525 organizations whose IRS filings report $351,489,076 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($57,739,504). 310 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY have?
IRS filings report 525 organizations giving $351,489,076 in grants to SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY, 310 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $57,739,504 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 525 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing