Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

HOPE FOR PAWS

HOPE FOR PAWS (California) receives grants from 112 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,427,661 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($1,482,205). 53 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 81% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$6.6M
Funders on record
112
Grants received
$4.4M
Net assets
$5.9M
53/112 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Hope for Paws does

Mission

Hope for Paws rescues dogs and all other animals who are suffering on the streets and in shelters. Our goal is to educate people on the importance of companion animals in our society, to reduce euthanasia rates at shelters, (continued on schedule o) increase adoption rates, and inspire people all over the world to take action in order to end animal abuse, neglect, and homelessness.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. At the beginning of 2024 Hope for Paws had to wait for our medical partners at cares to complete the construction of their new 7,000-square-foot surgical hospital. While waiting for this, we used different hospitals locally in order to continue our rescue work. We continued our mission to raise awareness worldwide with our youtube channel, and our growing instagram and tiktok accounts - helping us reach new audiences. On june 2024, the new hospital reopened and enabled us to save many more lives, create new partnerships, and bring in new partners so more sick and injured animals could be saved from city and county shelters in southern california. Hope for Paws continues providing food for rescue partners who need our support, as well as assisting with increasing medical costs.

    $5,565,415 spentof which $310,776 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $5,565,415.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.8M) Expenses 100 ($4.0M) Net assets 100 ($2.1M)2018 Revenue 133 ($5.1M) Expenses 107 ($4.3M) Net assets 138 ($2.8M)2019 Revenue 141 ($5.4M) Expenses 126 ($5.1M) Net assets 153 ($3.1M)2020 Revenue 173 ($6.6M) Expenses 143 ($5.8M) Net assets 195 ($4.0M)2021 Revenue 204 ($7.8M) Expenses 177 ($7.1M) Net assets 233 ($4.8M)2022 Revenue 226 ($8.6M) Expenses 194 ($7.8M) Net assets 246 ($5.1M)2023 Revenue 170 ($6.5M) Expenses 148 ($6.0M) Net assets 272 ($5.6M)2024 Revenue 173 ($6.6M) Expenses 172 ($6.9M) Net assets 289 ($5.9M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (173)Expenses (172)Net assets (289)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $5.4M to $6.8M (+25%).

$2.2M
$3.0M
$3.2M
$4.4M
$5.4M
$6.8M
$6.9M
$7.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

91% of HOPE FOR PAWS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (74% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,665 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$200k
’17
$778k
’18
$311k
’19
$859k
’20
$690k
’21
$812k
’22
$509k
’23
−$301k
’24
1.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Eldad Hagar

CEO

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed33366666
Joined·+0+0+3+1+1+1+0
No longer listed·0001110
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 17 funders to 35 funders, grant income rose $38k → $611k.

16 of 112 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 81% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of HOPE FOR PAWS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 112 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

HOPE FOR PAWS has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 33% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

85% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HOPE FOR PAWS.

33%
largest funder
57%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 46% · 2018 53% · 2019 41% · 2020 51% · 2021 45% · 2022 28% · 2023 22% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

29% of HOPE FOR PAWS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 47% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

81% of HOPE FOR PAWS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $833k that is directly attributable, 64% of it comes from funders outside California, across 26 states.

MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
WY
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
HI
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.6M arriving through sponsors registered in 11 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

HOPE FOR PAWS's revenue grew 73% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin−5% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.7mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,559 animals nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like HOPE FOR PAWS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 7%Fundraising 12%

Governance

3
board members
67%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HOPE FOR PAWS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds HOPE FOR PAWS?
HOPE FOR PAWS (California) receives grants from 112 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,427,661 to it, the largest being NETWORK FOR GOOD ($1,482,205). 53 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 81% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does HOPE FOR PAWS have?
IRS filings report 112 organizations giving $4,427,661 in grants to HOPE FOR PAWS, 53 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of HOPE FOR PAWS?
NETWORK FOR GOOD is the largest funder on record, with $1,482,205 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like HOPE FOR PAWS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 112 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing