Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL

BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL (Texas) receives grants from 135 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,416,397 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,509,360). 91 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$13M
Funders on record
135
Grants received
$11M
Net assets
$33M
91/135 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 21%
01What it does

What Bat Conservation International does

Mission

Bat Conservation International's (bci) mission is to conserve the world's bats and their ecosystems to ensure a healthy planet. We are a science-based and results-focused organization dedicated to ending the extinction of the world's most vulnerable bat species.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Bat Conservation International programs are science-based and collaborative, working with conservation partners in the u.s. And around the world to protect bats and their habitats by identifying, protecting, and managing critical bat habitats and addressing broad threats, like white-nose syndrome, that threaten multiple species of bats. Our work is focused on highpriority conservation targets and based on rigorous science and shared data. Developing effective solutions to protect bats requires bci to design innovative research programs while maintaining the ability to implement science-based solutions on the ground. Bci also seeks to increase public understanding and appreciation of the essential role bats play in the health of ecosystems and human well-being. By promoting research-led and science-based solutions around the world, bci collaborates with leading researchers and scientists around the world and supports graduate students through its granting programs.

    $13,905,524 spentof which $878,682 as grants$458,392 earned by the program
    94% of program spending
  2. Bat Conservation International's public engagement programs are designed to inspire people to conserve bats through inperson nature experiences that promote connectedness to nature. Strategies include community events, research, publications, training, and social media. Bci is committed to building global capacity by investing in the next generation of conservation leaders.

    $958,641 spent
    6% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $14,864,165.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4.7M) Expenses 100 ($4.8M) Net assets 100 ($9.4M)2018 Revenue 104 ($4.9M) Expenses 111 ($5.3M) Net assets 96 ($9.1M)2019 Revenue 136 ($6.4M) Expenses 100 ($4.8M) Net assets 115 ($11M)2020 Revenue 122 ($5.8M) Expenses 124 ($5.9M) Net assets 114 ($11M)2021 Revenue 189 ($8.9M) Expenses 129 ($6.2M) Net assets 149 ($14M)2022 Revenue 212 ($10M) Expenses 177 ($8.5M) Net assets 157 ($15M)2023 Revenue 676 ($32M) Expenses 230 ($11M) Net assets 379 ($36M)2024 Revenue 294 ($14M) Expenses 329 ($16M) Net assets 378 ($36M)2025 Revenue 279 ($13M) Expenses 352 ($17M) Net assets 356 ($33M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (279)Expenses (352)Net assets (356)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $16M to $37M (+132%).

$10M
$9.5M
$12M
$12M
$15M
$16M
$37M
$37M
$36M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 26% · 2018 25% · 2019 14% · 2020 41% · 2021 28% · 2022 35% · 2023 14% · 2024 55% · 2025 63%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$70k
’17
−$390k
’18
$1.6M
’19
−$137k
’20
$2.7M
’21
$1.5M
’22
$21M
’23
−$1.9M
’24
−$3.7M
’25
1.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Michael Daulton

Executive director

Board chair

Andrew Sansom

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed181917202123252225
Joined·+3+4+9+4+2+3+2+4
No longer listed·26630151
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 35 funders to 60 funders, grant income rose $369k → $1.8M.

19 of 135 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 35% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 135 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 13% of grant income, and it takes 7 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 7 funders to its left

46% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL.

13%
largest funder
33%
top three
~18
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 23% · 2018 16% · 2019 25% · 2020 20% · 2021 21% · 2022 16% · 2023 14% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

48% of BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL draws 87% of its grant income from funders outside Texas, across 31 states in all.

WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
DE
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $4.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 13 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $56.7M on record.

Federal$56.7M
grants $56.7Mcontracts $49k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$29.4M
  • Department of Agriculture$19.4M
  • Department of Energy$7.9M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 5%Fundraising 7%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

69%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 39 states

AK
ME
NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL?
BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL (Texas) receives grants from 135 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,416,397 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,509,360). 91 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL have?
IRS filings report 135 organizations giving $11,416,397 in grants to BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL, 91 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $1,509,360 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 135 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing