Skip to content

Colorado · Nonprofit

Save the Storks

Save the Storks (Colorado) receives grants from 78 organizations whose IRS filings report $15,769,910 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($5,539,745). 41 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 91% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$7.5M
Funders on record
78
Grants received
$16M
Net assets
$3.3M
41/78 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 33%
01What it does

What Save the Storks does

Mission

We elevate the standards of care that make motherhood accessible by: 1) providing state of the art Mobile Medical Clinics, 2) supporting high-caliber women's health clinics, 3) empowering local organizations and churches to deliver a robust network of resources, and 4) offering a digital platform with 24-hour resources for women.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Church, community, and pregnancy health clinic partnership programSave the Storks' church, community, and pregnancy health clinic partnership program equips local leaders and life-affirming clinics to meet the needs of women facing unexpected pregnancies with compassion, clinical excellence, and holistic care. Through our national partner program, we provide pregnancy centers with no-cost access to expert training, medical leadership, and strategic support to strengthen and expand their services. We also offer targeted grants to assist with aaahc accreditation, ultrasound staffing, and overall clinic quality. Our fleet of state-of-the-art mobile medical clinics delivers free pregnancy tests, ultrasounds, and sti/std testing in a safe, confidential setting (continued on schedule o)meeting women where they are and removing barriers to care. Additionally, our church programs empowered faith communities to become judgment-free spaces of hope, offering practical, emotional, and spiritual support to women, moms, and families. Community engagement initiatives, including our annual innovator's summit and collaborative events, brought together like-minded leaders and organizations to build…

    $3,143,173 spentof which $1,021,089 as grants
    47% of program spending
  2. Awareness and marketing impactSave the Storks continued to invest in strategic awareness efforts to advance a life-affirming culture and ensure women can access trustworthy information in moments of need. Through videos, short films, blogs, educational curriculum, and targeted digital media campaigns, we reached millions of individuals with messages of hope, dignity, and support. By telling authentic stories, engaging directly with women online, and empowering communities with shareable, life-affirming content, we are transforming not only how people see the issue, but how they respond to it.

    $2,079,216 spent$2,394 earned by the program
    31% of program spending
  3. For every woman programfor every woman is a 24/7 digital platform that connects women to nearly 20,000 life-affirming programs and resources across all 50 states. Designed to meet women in their pivotal moments, the platform cuts through misinformation with clarity, compassion, and medically accurate information. Women and teens can search for help related to medical care, mental health, education, career development, financial assistance, housing, and family/childcare support, all tailored to their zip code and life stage. This user-friendly platform serves as a centralized hub to guide women before, during, and after pregnancy, ensuring they are never alone in navigating complex decisions.

    $1,429,585 spent
    21% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $6,651,974.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.9M) Expenses 100 ($3.9M) Net assets 100 ($2.0M)2018 Revenue 135 ($5.3M) Expenses 141 ($5.5M) Net assets 93 ($1.8M)2019 Revenue 213 ($8.4M) Expenses 191 ($7.4M) Net assets 141 ($2.8M)2020 Revenue 196 ($7.7M) Expenses 205 ($8.0M) Net assets 129 ($2.6M)2021 Revenue 208 ($8.2M) Expenses 186 ($7.2M) Net assets 178 ($3.5M)2022 Revenue 212 ($8.4M) Expenses 215 ($8.4M) Net assets 177 ($3.5M)2023 Revenue 213 ($8.4M) Expenses 221 ($8.6M) Net assets 167 ($3.3M)2024 Revenue 191 ($7.5M) Expenses 193 ($7.5M) Net assets 169 ($3.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (191)Expenses (193)Net assets (169)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $2.5M to $4.5M (+80%).

$2.6M
$2.5M
$4.5M
$3.9M
$4.3M
$4.5M
$3.6M
$3.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 6% · 2021 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

103% of Save the Storks’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,632 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$46k
’17
−$152k
’18
$968k
’19
−$242k
’20
$973k
’21
−$1k
’22
−$228k
’23
$31k
’24
1.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Diane Ferraro

Chief executive officer

Board chair

Herb Mccarthy

Chairman/consultant

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2020 and FY2021 filings.

2017201820192020202120222024
Listed77101391210
Joined·+2+4+8+1+3·
No longer listed·21550·
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 11 funders to 28 funders, grant income rose $947k → $2.3M.

27 of 78 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 91% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Save the Storks’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 78 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Save the Storks leans on a few funders — its largest provides 35% of grant income and the top three 68%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

92% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Save the Storks.

35%
largest funder
68%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 90% · 2018 27% · 2019 25% · 2020 56% · 2021 34% · 2022 70% · 2023 53% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of Save the Storks's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 53% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

91% of Save the Storks's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1.5M that is directly attributable, 91% of it comes from funders outside Colorado, across 26 states.

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
WY
IA
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $14M arriving through sponsors registered in 19 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Save the Storks has grown faster than half of the 8,126 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin0% · below the median
Months of reserve1.5mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 8,126 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like Save the Storks

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

78% of spending goes to programs.

Program 78%Management 9%Fundraising 13%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 15 states

AK
NH
WA
ND
MN
WI
MA
CO
WV
VA
TN
SC
HI
MS
GA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Save the Storks: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Save the Storks?
Save the Storks (Colorado) receives grants from 78 organizations whose IRS filings report $15,769,910 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($5,539,745). 41 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 91% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Save the Storks have?
IRS filings report 78 organizations giving $15,769,910 in grants to Save the Storks, 41 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Save the Storks?
NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC is the largest funder on record, with $5,539,745 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Save the Storks find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 78 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing