Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Colorado · Nonprofit

THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY

THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY (Colorado) receives grants from 310 organizations whose IRS filings report $22,491,164 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($4,476,046). 195 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 58% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$36M
Revenue FY2024
310
Funders on record
$22M
Grants received
$30M
Net assets
195/310 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 12%

Against its field

THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY has grown faster than half of the 235 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin4% · below the median
Months of reserve1.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 235 animals nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($16M) Expenses 100 ($14M) Net assets 100 ($11M)2018 Revenue 128 ($21M) Expenses 132 ($19M) Net assets 119 ($13M)2019 Revenue 123 ($20M) Expenses 140 ($20M) Net assets 120 ($13M)2020 Revenue 144 ($23M) Expenses 152 ($22M) Net assets 136 ($15M)2021 Revenue 156 ($25M) Expenses 155 ($22M) Net assets 166 ($19M)2022 Revenue 196 ($32M) Expenses 176 ($25M) Net assets 227 ($25M)2023 Revenue 209 ($34M) Expenses 215 ($31M) Net assets 257 ($29M)2024 Revenue 224 ($36M) Expenses 245 ($35M) Net assets 271 ($30M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (224)Expenses (245)Net assets (271)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

99% of THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (67% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 234 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$2.0M
17
$2.1M
18
$113k
19
$1.8M
20
$3.4M
21
$6.8M
22
$3.4M
23
$1.5M
24
1.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 66 funders to 135 funders, grant income rose $1.1M → $3.4M.

40 of 310 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)58% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 310 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

63% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY.

20%
largest funder
45%
top three
~11
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 28% · 2018 52% · 2019 37% · 2020 27% · 2021 35% · 2022 23% · 2023 15%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

52% of THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

58% of THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $9.4M that is directly attributable, 75% of it comes from funders outside Colorado, across 39 states.

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $13M arriving through sponsors registered in 18 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 310 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 5%Fundraising 2%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY?
THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY (Colorado) receives grants from 310 organizations whose IRS filings report $22,491,164 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($4,476,046). 195 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 58% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY have?
IRS filings report 310 organizations giving $22,491,164 in grants to THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY, 195 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $4,476,046 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 310funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing