Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

Wildlife Conservation Society

Wildlife Conservation Society (New York) receives grants from 754 organizations whose IRS filings report $344,164,193 to it, the largest being GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION ($40,840,832). 495 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$401M
Funders on record
754
Grants received
$344M
Net assets
$869M
495/754 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%
01What it does

What Wildlife Conservation Society does

Mission

The Wildlife Conservation Society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Global Conservation

    $206,913,352 spentof which $24,128,708 as grants
    51% of program spending
  2. Zoos and Aquarium in New York City

    $195,685,151 spent$58,938,352 earned by the program
    49% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $402,598,503.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($251M) Expenses 100 ($266M) Net assets 100 ($820M)2018 Revenue 111 ($279M) Expenses 106 ($281M) Net assets 104 ($852M)2019 Revenue 105 ($264M) Expenses 111 ($295M) Net assets 102 ($839M)2020 Revenue 102 ($256M) Expenses 112 ($299M) Net assets 97 ($799M)2021 Revenue 112 ($281M) Expenses 118 ($313M) Net assets 108 ($882M)2022 Revenue 156 ($393M) Expenses 127 ($337M) Net assets 113 ($928M)2023 Revenue 137 ($346M) Expenses 141 ($374M) Net assets 111 ($909M)2024 Revenue 155 ($389M) Expenses 169 ($449M) Net assets 108 ($887M)2025 Revenue 159 ($401M) Expenses 172 ($456M) Net assets 106 ($869M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (159)Expenses (172)Net assets (106)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $1.1B to $1.3B (+14%).

$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.2B
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 39% · 2018 42% · 2019 46% · 2020 41% · 2021 33% · 2022 24% · 2023 27% · 2024 28% · 2025 26%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

73% of Wildlife Conservation Society’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (73% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 15 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$14M
’17
−$2.2M
’18
−$31M
’19
−$43M
’20
−$32M
’21
$56M
’22
−$28M
’23
−$60M
’24
−$55M
’25
2.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Monica P Medina

President & CEO through 4/1/24

Board chair

Alejandro Santo Domingo

Chair & Trustee

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed545151515255575654
Joined·+6+7+1+4+13+4+5+1
No longer listed·971310263
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 189 funders to 323 funders, grant income rose $20M → $50M.

39 of 754 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 21% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $39M from 27 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money Wildlife Conservation Society raised.

From the IRS filings of Wildlife Conservation Society’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 754 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Wildlife Conservation Society has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 12% of grant income, and it takes 11 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 11 funders to its left

31% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Wildlife Conservation Society.

12%
largest funder
25%
top three
~28
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 22% · 2018 18% · 2019 29% · 2020 17% · 2021 10% · 2022 13% · 2023 18% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

47% of Wildlife Conservation Society's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 66% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Wildlife Conservation Society draws 74% of its grant income from funders outside New York, across 43 states in all.

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $71M arriving through sponsors registered in 21 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Wildlife Conservation Society's funding base is broadening — from 189 funders to 323 as grant income climbed.

Revenue growth (annualized)6% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15 animals nonprofits over $100M, FY2025

Government funding Wildlife Conservation Society receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $274.8M on record — $274.7M federal, $84k state.

Federal$274.7M
grants $267.7Mcontracts $7.1M
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Agency for International Development$119.4M
  • Department of State$83.6M
  • Department of the Interior$54.2M
  • Department of Defense$7.2M
  • Department of Agriculture$4.8M
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration$1.8M
State$84k
04
05
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
21
23
24
By state
  • NJ$63k
  • OR$21k
  • VT$348

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Wildlife Conservation Society

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 9%Fundraising 3%

Governance

36
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

90%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 41 states

AK
ME
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
MD
DE
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Part of a family of 28 related entities

  • Makira Carbon Company LLC · disregarded
  • Tierra de Guanacos LLC · disregarded
  • Tierra de Truchas LLC · disregarded
  • Tierras LLC · disregarded
  • Conservation Livelihoods Int'l LLC · disregarded

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Wildlife Conservation Society: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society?
Wildlife Conservation Society (New York) receives grants from 754 organizations whose IRS filings report $344,164,193 to it, the largest being GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION ($40,840,832). 495 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Wildlife Conservation Society have?
IRS filings report 754 organizations giving $344,164,193 in grants to Wildlife Conservation Society, 495 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Wildlife Conservation Society?
GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $40,840,832 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Wildlife Conservation Society find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 754 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing