Loading…
Loading…
Utah · Nonprofit
OUR RESCUE (Utah) is funded by 371 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $45,665,115 in grants to it, the largest being THE NAZARENE FUND ($20,003,550). 178 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
OUR RESCUE has grown faster than three-quarters of the 552 arts & culture nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 552 arts & culture nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
94% of OUR RESCUE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (61% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$628k from 7 funders in 2025, up from $1.7M and 31 in 2017.
70 of 371 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of OUR RESCUE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 371 funders by total. Association, not causation.
OUR RESCUE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 44% of grant income and the top three 59%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 51% · 2018 36% · 2019 31% · 2020 25% · 2021 17% · 2022 14% · 2023 85% · 2024 31% · 2025 95% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
23% of OUR RESCUE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 48% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
OUR RESCUE is locally rooted: 59% of its grant income comes from Utah funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 371 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
70% of spending goes to programs.
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 40 states
Part of a family of 41 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 371funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing