Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC

THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 148 organizations whose IRS filings report $34,257,440 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($6,520,000). 94 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$12M
Funders on record
148
Grants received
$34M
Net assets
$6.5M
94/148 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 74%
01What it does

What Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc does

Mission

To guarantee all americans quality places to hunt and fish.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The theodore roosevelt conservation partnership (trcp) works to guarantee all americans quality places to hunt and fish. Founded in 2002, the trcp is the largest coalition of conservation organizations in the country, uniting and amplifying the voices of sportsmen and sportswomen by convening hunting and fishing groups, conservation organizations, and outdoor businesses to a common purpose. Today, the organization's partner network includes over 100 nonprofits and businesses all united around the conservation legacy of former-president theodore roosevelt. See schedule o for continuation.

    $7,524,637 spent
    100% of program spending
  2. In pursuit of its work, the trcp has earned a strong reputation for providing nonpartisan education and advocacy at both the federal and state level to strengthen broad-based conservation efforts, protecting wildlife and fish habitat, and ensuring public access to the nation's lands and waters. The trcp has four policy centers: public lands, private lands, marine fisheries, and water resources. Priorities for each policy center are as follows: public lands: to conserve public lands, the trcp supports management that balances development with fish and wildlife needs including through the identification and conservation of migration corridors and implementation of ecosystem conservation plans, integrating the backcountry conservation management approach into management plan revisions, defending public lands from sale or transfer, and improving access by modernizing agency data and opening landlocked public lands. Private lands: to support conservation of privately-owned agriculture or forest lands, the trcp advocates for an expanded conservation title in the farm bill, strong implementation of working lands conservation programs, and federal funding and action to curb the spread of…

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $7,524,637.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($6.0M) Expenses 100 ($4.4M) Net assets 100 ($3.8M)2018 Revenue 85 ($5.1M) Expenses 114 ($5.0M) Net assets 28 ($1.1M)2019 Revenue 121 ($7.2M) Expenses 131 ($5.8M) Net assets 66 ($2.5M)2020 Revenue 126 ($7.5M) Expenses 129 ($5.7M) Net assets 114 ($4.3M)2021 Revenue 131 ($7.9M) Expenses 155 ($6.9M) Net assets 139 ($5.3M)2022 Revenue 139 ($8.3M) Expenses 190 ($8.4M) Net assets 130 ($4.9M)2023 Revenue 153 ($9.2M) Expenses 208 ($9.2M) Net assets 133 ($5.0M)2024 Revenue 137 ($8.2M) Expenses 210 ($9.3M) Net assets 106 ($4.0M)2025 Revenue 193 ($12M) Expenses 209 ($9.3M) Net assets 170 ($6.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (193)Expenses (209)Net assets (170)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $7.4M to $9.6M (+30%).

$4.1M
$2.7M
$3.6M
$5.7M
$6.9M
$7.7M
$8.5M
$7.4M
$9.6M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 0% · 2020 7%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (67% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 238 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.6M
’17
$25k
’18
$1.4M
’19
$1.8M
’20
$969k
’21
−$116k
’22
−$62k
’23
−$1.1M
’24
$2.3M
’25
4.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Alston Watt

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed283126343640383937
Joined·+4+5+11+3+13+1+10+5
No longer listed·110319397
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 21 funders to 69 funders, grant income rose $2.2M → $5.1M.

24 of 148 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 12% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $130k from 3 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest American Sportfishing Association). These are real filings, and they are not money THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC raised.

From the IRS filings of THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 148 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 19% of grant income, and it takes 7 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 7 funders to its left

19%
largest funder
37%
top three
~14
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 42% · 2018 53% · 2019 39% · 2020 20% · 2021 25% · 2022 15% · 2023 15% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

48% of THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 64% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC draws 93% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 31 states in all.

ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
NM
AR
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $4.2M arriving through sponsors registered in 16 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 134 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin20% · above the median
Months of reserve4.0mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 134 animals nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $96k on record.

Federal$96k
grants $96kcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
22
23
Top agencies
  • Department of Commerce$60k
  • Department of the Interior$36k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 4%Fundraising 15%

Governance

28
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

81%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 27 states

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
MS
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC?
THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 148 organizations whose IRS filings report $34,257,440 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($6,520,000). 94 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC have?
IRS filings report 148 organizations giving $34,257,440 in grants to THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC, 94 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC?
THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $6,520,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 148 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing