· Private foundation
Allegis Group Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k207 grants · $478k
- $10k–50k47 grants · $967k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SKILLSUSA FOUNDATION INC | $1,111,750 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF MD | $329,616 |
| THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND | $270,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC | $249,887 |
| PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION | $214,225 |
| PER SCHOLAS INC | $205,000 |
| GARY SINISE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $156,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL MD | $82,500 |
| WORKING FOR WOMEN | $75,000 |
| JOBWORKS INC | $70,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC | $64,000 |
| BUSINESS VOLUNTEERS MARYLAND | $63,500 |
| OUT IN SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING & MATHEMATICS INC | $61,000 |
| SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY | $60,000 |
| SOCIETY OF AMERICAN MILITARY ENGINEERS FOUNDATION | $52,180 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
399 repeat relationships — 165 still active in FY2025, 234 since wound down; 97 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $402k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPER SCHOLAS INC8× · 2018–2025 · $13M · revenue +256%
- PTPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +51%
- JAJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC8× · 2018–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +3%
Funded once
- MIMOMProjectOrg Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue ×14 · 57% of their budget
- GTGLOBAL TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $128k · revenue +30%
- TTECHNOVATIONIRIDESCENTone grant, 2022 · $101k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.
At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.
Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…
People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…
As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…
Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…
We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Emery Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
861 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 861 of the 1,086 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
- Who funds SKILLSUSA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC ↗
- Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
- Who funds GTIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds BUSINESS VOLUNTEERS MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds WORKING FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds 21ST CENTURY LEADERS INC ↗
- Who funds BACK ON MY FEET ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA ↗
- Who funds MOMProjectOrg Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL FEDERATION FOR JUST COMMUNITIES OF WNY INC ↗
- Who funds TECHNOVATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ↗
- Who funds THE BALTIMORE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF AMERICAN MILITARY ENGINEERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VENTURE CATALYSTS ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ASIAN SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NORTH CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH METRO MIRACLE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds FORT MEADE ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE Inc Helping Other People be Empowered ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · The Bunting Family Foundation · The Baltimore Orioles Foundation Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · Thomas Wilson Sanitarium for Children of Baltimore City · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allegis Group Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Chesapeake Bay Trust — 100% of income from government
- Baltimore Urban League Inc — 100% of income from government
- Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
- The Baltimore Children's Museum Inc — 33% of income from government
- Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — 22% of income from government
- Urban League of Essex County — 20% of income from government
- International Youth Foundation — 17% of income from government
- The Baltimore Station Inc — 11% of income from government
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Maryland New Directions Inc — 8% of income from government
- B&o Railroad Museum Inc — 7% of income from government
- Make Studio Art Program Inc — 4% of income from government
- Baltimore Sports Tourism Development Council Inc — 4% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity of the Chesapeake Inc — 4% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- Students 2 Science Inc — 1% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Allegis Group Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Allegis Group Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.