· Private foundation
The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k104 grants · $414k
- $10k–50k314 grants · $6.5M
- $50k–250k292 grants · $31M
- $250k+162 grants · $90M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WAI'ANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $6,835,620 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC | $3,850,000 |
| THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE | $3,000,000 |
| AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC | $1,800,000 |
| NATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS | $1,300,000 |
| ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION | $1,250,000 |
| NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES INC | $1,100,000 |
| FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC | $1,050,000 |
| THE CONFERENCE ON JEWISH MATERIAL CLAIMS AGAINST GERMANY INC | $1,000,000 |
| BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION | $1,000,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL | $1,000,000 |
| METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY | $1,000,000 |
| FEDERATION HOUSING INC | $1,000,000 |
| KESHET | $1,000,000 |
| GOODWILL OF CENTRAL & SOUTHERN INDIANA | $1,000,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $77.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 18% of The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
843 repeat relationships — 420 still active in FY2024, 423 since wound down; 152 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $35M · revenue +24%
FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC6× · 2017–2024 · $23M · revenue +326% · 73% of their budget- WCWAIANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION5× · 2020–2024 · $11M · revenue +121% · 74% of their budget
Funded once
- KDKESHET DONOR ADVISED FUND ILone grant, 2023 · $4.0M
- HAHOUSING ACCELERATOR FUNDone grant, 2022 · $3.0M
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $3.0M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
To provide rehabilitative housing services and support to help people with psychiatric disabilities reintegrate into the community.the agency provides rehabilitative housing services and staff support as a primary mechanism for achieving…
Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
Abilitypath housing advances affordable, accessible housing projects that promote independence and inclusive communities for adults with developmental disabilities. through partnerships and innovative program designs, abilitypath housing…
Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.
Housing unlimited, inc. is a non-profit dedicated to providing affordable, permanent housing opportunities and independent living for adults in mental health recovery.
To strengthen the resilience and hope of our diverse community members by improving their health and well-being.
Path to jobs, inc. is a workforce development and job placement organization with a mission to provide personalized career-readiness skills training, coaching, case management, benefits counseling, support to enter/re-enter the workforce,…
We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Konnekt Global. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1386 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1386 of the 1,833 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ASSOCIATED JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds WAIANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds CIVIC WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds NON-PROFIT TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE NETWORK DBA NTEN ↗
- Who funds Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany Inc ↗
- Who funds NONPROFIT FINANCE FUND ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FUND FOR WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES INC ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BENEFITS DATA TRUST ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds LEADING EDGE ALLIANCEINC ↗
- Who funds SERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC ↗
- Who funds WAIANAE DISTR COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH & ↗
- Who funds REBUILD METRO INC ↗
- Who funds NPOWER INC ↗
- Who funds PAUL'S PLACE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Abell Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · Aloha United Way Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · David & Barbara B Hirschhorn Foundation Inc · Atherton Family Foundation · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · West Baltimore Renaissance Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc — 100% of income from government
- Lgbtq Senior Housing Inc — 100% of income from government
- Baltimore Alliance for Careers in Health — 100% of income from government
- Roca Inc — 78% of income from government
- Cathedral Square Corporation — 73% of income from government
- Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
- Hebrew Rehabilitation Center — 53% of income from government
- Central Baltimore Partnership Inc — 46% of income from government
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc — 40% of income from government
- Project Plase Inc — 39% of income from government
- Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
- Bridge Meadows — 36% of income from government
- The Ministry of Caring Inc — 30% of income from government
- Paul's Place Inc — 29% of income from government
- Comprehensive Housing Assistance Inc — 23% of income from government
- Baltimore Squashwise Inc — 23% of income from government
- Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — 22% of income from government
- Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
- Neighborhood Housing Services of Baltimore Inc — 22% of income from government
- Roberta's House Inc — 21% of income from government
- Moveable Feast Inc — 18% of income from government
- Baltimore Corps Inc — 15% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Family and Children's Services of Centra — 10% of income from government
- Homes for America Inc — 8% of income from government
- Episcopal Housing Corporation — 8% of income from government
- Baltimore Medical System Inc — 8% of income from government
- 2LIFE Communities Inc — 8% of income from government
- Community Assistance Network Inc — 7% of income from government
- Banner Neighborhoods Community Corp — 6% of income from government
- Rebuild Metro Inc — 5% of income from government
- Everymind Inc — 4% of income from government
- Art With a Heart Inc — 4% of income from government
- Chase Brexton Health Services Inc — 4% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity of the Chesapeake Inc — 4% of income from government
- People Encouraging People Inc — 3% of income from government
- Wide Angle Youth Media Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore — 2% of income from government
- Carrfour Supportive Housing Inc — 2% of income from government
- Digital Harbor Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Marian House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
- Center for Hope Inc — 1% of income from government
- Enterprise Community Development Inc — 1% of income from government
- Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
- Arts for Learning Maryland Inc — 1% of income from government
- Jewish Community Housing Corporation of Metropolitan New Jersey — 0% of income from government
- Hebrew Senior Life Inc — 0% of income from government
- Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.