· Private foundation
Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k96 grants · $147k
- $10k–50k38 grants · $710k
- $50k–250k21 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+2 grants · $650k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $387,250 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $262,500 |
| University of Maryland Medicine | $175,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $140,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $120,000 |
| Living Classrooms Foundation | $100,750 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND | $100,750 |
| GREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER | $100,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF VIRGINIA | $100,000 |
| Smithsonians National Zoological Park | $100,000 |
| MERCY MEDICAL CENTER | $100,000 |
| NATIONAL AQUARIUM IN BALTIMORE | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $90,000 |
| CHESAPEAKE BAY OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL | $83,333 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $80,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $437k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
288 repeat relationships — 85 still active in FY2025, 203 since wound down; 63 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $805k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY6× · 2020–2025 · $513k · revenue +42%- GBGREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER INC4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue +10%
- TUTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC4× · 2020–2025 · $308k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- JHJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITYone grant, 2024 · $250k
- UFUMMS FOUNDATIONSHOCK TRAUMA CELEBone grant, 2024 · $125k
- STSHOCK TRAUMA AT UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Mone grant, 2024 · $125k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Nature Sacred. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
518 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 518 of the 875 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Medical Center ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AQUARIUM INC ↗
- Who funds WATERFRONT PARTNERSHIP OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds ROCA INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds B-360 Baltimore Inc ↗
- Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE HOMECOMING INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds NATURE SACRED ↗
- Who funds BUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ron Brown Scholar Fund ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST FRUITS FARM INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Bunting Family Foundation · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · Venable Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Chesapeake Bay Trust — 100% of income from government
- Fells Point Main Street Inc — 100% of income from government
- Roca Inc — 78% of income from government
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Society for the Preservation of Maryland Antiquities Inc — 50% of income from government
- Lutheran World Relief Inc — 47% of income from government
- Mount Vernon Place Conservancy Inc — 40% of income from government
- Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Pride of Baltimore Inc — 30% of income from government
- Govans Ecumenical Development Corp — 28% of income from government
- First Fruits Farm Inc — 26% of income from government
- Primary Source Inc — 23% of income from government
- Delaware State University — 18% of income from government
- International Youth Foundation — 17% of income from government
- Baltimore Corps Inc — 15% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Maryland Historical Society Inc — 9% of income from government
- Maryland Academy of Sciences — 9% of income from government
- The Family Tree Inc — 9% of income from government
- Charles River Watershed Association Inc — 8% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Industry Inc — 7% of income from government
- B&o Railroad Museum Inc — 7% of income from government
- Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service Inc — 7% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
- Economic Mobility Pathways Inc — 6% of income from government
- Warrior Canine Connection Inc — 5% of income from government
- Community Foundation for MetroWest Inc — 4% of income from government
- Chase Brexton Health Services Inc — 4% of income from government
- Maryland Zoological Society Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Watershed Institute Inc — 3% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Waterfront Partnership of Baltimore Inc — 2% of income from government
- Annapolis Maritime Museum Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- New England Conservatory of Music — 1% of income from government
- Edvestors Inc — 1% of income from government
- National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc — 0% of income from government
- Washington College — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Adoptions Together Inc Dba As Paths for Families — 0% of income from government
- Ceres Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mercy Medical Center — 0% of income from government
- Greater Baltimore Medical Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.