Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

LIFEMOVES

LIFEMOVES (California) receives grants from 261 organizations whose IRS filings report $102,833,283 to it, the largest being Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($23,266,833). 172 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 50% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$69M
Funders on record
261
Grants received
$103M
Net assets
$160M
172/261 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 41%
01What it does

What Lifemoves does

Mission

Lifemoves provides interim housing and supportive services for homeless families and individuals to rapidly return to stable housing and achieve long-term self-sufficiency.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Interim housing & supportive services: in our most recent fiscal year fy25 (july 1, 2024 through june 30, 2025), Lifemoves provided over 543,633 nights of shelter, and returned over 1,900 clients to permanent housing. On any given night, we feed, clothe, and house more than 1,578 individuals across 26 shelter and service sites, through the work of more than 425 employees and thousands of supporters and volunteers. In addition to providing the basic necessities of food, clothing, and shelter, Lifemoves provides intensive case management and a broad range of supportive services including employment counseling, housing locator assistance, financial literacy education, benefits enrollment, health care referrals, substance use disorder counseling, and behavioral health support services.

    $39,045,541 spentof which $7,767,744 as grants$154,723 earned by the program
    73% of program spending
  2. Services for chronically homeless individuals: chronically homeless clients are defined by the federal department of housing and urban development (hud); these clients have a documented disability and have been homeless for over 12 months consecutively, or homeless for 4+ episodes in the last 3 years totaling more than 12 months. Chronically homeless individuals enter programs with different needs, wants, and barriers. Clients coming in the "door" to a Lifemoves program last year fell into 3 roughly equal groups: first-time homeless (35%); chronically homeless (35%); and in-between (30%). Serving these disparate groups well requires that we balance our resources thoughtfully and have multiple tools in our services toolkit. This speaks to why it is so essential that Lifemoves tailors services and supports for individual clients.

    $7,803,764 spentof which $1,552,486 as grants
    15% of program spending
  3. Services for veterans: with the launch of eleven-eleven, Lifemoves now operates a total of 90 veteran-dedicated housing units across san mateo and santa clara counties. The new program, developed in partnership with the u.s. Department of veterans affairs, expands Lifemoves' capacity to serve veterans experiencing homelessness by roughly 20%, providing critical housing and essential services tailored to the needs of former service members. In fiscal year 2024, Lifemoves assisted approximately 280 veteran clients, a number that continues to decline as veterans engage successfully with supportive programs. This fiscal year, we have consistently had more than thirty veterans enrolled at any given time. As a result of this veteran specific program, collaboration between the va and Lifemoves has been elevated. Additionally, service provision has increased, including the ability to serve veteran couples and veterans with a caregiver where it otherwise was too difficult while at the san mateo county navigation center.

    $2,790,450 spentof which $555,134 as grants
    5% of program spending
  4. Outreach and other interim housing services - Lifemoves continues to be the largest provider of homeless interim housing serving adults and children in silicon valley.

    $3,944,872 spentof which $784,795 as grants$259,456 earned by the program
    7% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $53,584,627.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($24M) Expenses 100 ($21M) Net assets 100 ($20M)2018 Revenue 100 ($24M) Expenses 112 ($24M) Net assets 101 ($20M)2019 Revenue 125 ($30M) Expenses 132 ($28M) Net assets 112 ($23M)2020 Revenue 161 ($39M) Expenses 166 ($35M) Net assets 130 ($26M)2021 Revenue 267 ($64M) Expenses 216 ($46M) Net assets 223 ($45M)2022 Revenue 263 ($63M) Expenses 236 ($50M) Net assets 280 ($56M)2023 Revenue 486 ($117M) Expenses 288 ($61M) Net assets 571 ($115M)2024 Revenue 451 ($109M) Expenses 313 ($66M) Net assets 788 ($159M)2025 Revenue 285 ($69M) Expenses 331 ($70M) Net assets 790 ($160M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (285)Expenses (331)Net assets (790)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $76M to $151M (+98%).

$32M
$34M
$36M
$43M
$62M
$76M
$151M
$191M
$186M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 53% · 2018 55% · 2019 49% · 2020 46% · 2021 62% · 2022 44% · 2023 30% · 2024 39% · 2025 54%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$3.0M
’17
$465k
’18
$2.1M
’19
$3.8M
’20
$19M
’21
$14M
’22
$56M
’23
$43M
’24
−$1.1M
’25
5.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Aubrey Merriman

Chief executive officer

Board chair

Melissa Selcher

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed242628293026253332
Joined·+4+4+6+3+4+6+11+8
No longer listed·22528739
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 61 funders to 127 funders, grant income rose $3.2M → $22M.

43 of 261 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 50% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LIFEMOVES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 261 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LIFEMOVES has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 23% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

62% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund LIFEMOVES.

23%
largest funder
41%
top three
~12
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 26% · 2018 28% · 2019 35% · 2020 17% · 2021 42% · 2022 43% · 2023 36% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

51% of LIFEMOVES's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 66% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

50% of LIFEMOVES's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $51M that is directly attributable, 88% of it comes from California funders.

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $51M arriving through sponsors registered in 17 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding LIFEMOVES receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $46.1M on record.

Federal$46.1M
grants $16.3Mcontracts $29.8M
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$35.4M
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$10.7M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like LIFEMOVES

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 15%Fundraising 9%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 4 related entities

  • Vendome LLC · disregarded
  • Family Crossroads LLC · disregarded
  • Homesafe San Jose LP · partnership
  • Homesafe Santa Clara LP · partnership

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LIFEMOVES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LIFEMOVES?
LIFEMOVES (California) receives grants from 261 organizations whose IRS filings report $102,833,283 to it, the largest being Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($23,266,833). 172 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 50% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does LIFEMOVES have?
IRS filings report 261 organizations giving $102,833,283 in grants to LIFEMOVES, 172 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LIFEMOVES?
Silicon Valley Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $23,266,833 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LIFEMOVES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Lifemoves →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 261 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing