California · Nonprofit
STAND UP TO CANCER
STAND UP TO CANCER (California) receives grants from 197 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,744,815 to it, the largest being JEAN & LEWIS WOLFF FAMILY FOUNDATION ($1,025,000). 64 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
STAND UP TO CANCER's funding base is broadening — from 23 funders to 60 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 828 philanthropy nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Give Lively Foundation Incshared funders
- Matthew Hill Foundation Incportfolio match
- Tower Cancer Research Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of STAND UP TO CANCER’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (80% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 23 funders to 60 funders, grant income rose $213k → $3.1M.
10 of 197 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 20% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of STAND UP TO CANCER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 197 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
STAND UP TO CANCER has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 12% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left
36% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund STAND UP TO CANCER.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 36% · 2018 52% · 2019 31% · 2020 60% · 2021 73% · 2022 40% · 2023 32% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
16% of STAND UP TO CANCER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 32% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
STAND UP TO CANCER draws 57% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 34 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.7M arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 197 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Give Lively Foundation Incshared fundersNY · backs 239 organizations that share your funders
- Matthew Hill Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tower Cancer Research Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Joseph and Fiora Stone Foundation co Wolf and Associates CPA Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Haymakers for Hope Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ambers Antibodies Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tisbest Philanthropyshared fundersWA · backs 125 organizations that share your funders
- Givinga Foundation Incshared fundersMA · backs 129 organizations that share your funders
- Pledgeling Foundationshared fundersCA · backs 190 organizations that share your funders
- Tiaa Charitable Incshared fundersNC · backs 163 organizations that share your funders
- Arie and Ida Crown Memorialshared fundersIL · backs 94 organizations that share your funders
- Fjcshared fundersNY · backs 155 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like STAND UP TO CANCER
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
100% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 27 states
Part of a family of 1 related entity
- Entertainment Industry Foundation · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for STAND UP TO CANCER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER?
- STAND UP TO CANCER (California) receives grants from 197 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,744,815 to it, the largest being JEAN & LEWIS WOLFF FAMILY FOUNDATION ($1,025,000). 64 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does STAND UP TO CANCER have?
- IRS filings report 197 organizations giving $8,744,815 in grants to STAND UP TO CANCER, 64 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of STAND UP TO CANCER?
- JEAN & LEWIS WOLFF FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,025,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like STAND UP TO CANCER find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2022–2024), and the filings of 197funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing