Loading…
Loading…
Wisconsin · Nonprofit
THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC (Wisconsin) is funded by 372 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $155,191,792 in grants to it, the largest being THE ROBERT D AND PATRICIA E KERN ($22,025,000). 226 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC has grown faster than half of the 651 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 651 education nonprofits over $100M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
14% of THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (13% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$1.4M from 24 funders in 2025, up from $6.2M and 63 in 2017.
44 of 372 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 372 funders by total. Association, not causation.
THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 14% of grant income, and it takes 11 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 11 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 28% · 2018 15% · 2019 18% · 2020 18% · 2021 17% · 2022 13% · 2023 27% · 2024 26% · 2025 18% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
35% of THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 61% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC is locally rooted: 53% of its grant income comes from Wisconsin funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 372 funders put you well-backed among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.2B on record — $1.2B federal, $22k state.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
92% of spending goes to programs.
87%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 11 states
Part of a family of 11 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 372funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing