· Private foundation
The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of THE MARION I & HENRY J KNOTT FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k59 grants · $129k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $365k
- $50k–250k27 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST VINCENT DEPAUL OF BALTIMORE | $89,000 |
| INTERSECTION OF CHANGE | $75,000 |
| VEHICLES FOR CHANGE | $75,000 |
| FRANCISCAN CENTER | $75,000 |
| BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF BALTIMORE | $75,000 |
| CHESAPEAKE BAY OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL | $75,000 |
| PROJECT JUMPSTART | $75,000 |
| THE RELIGIOUS COALITION | $75,000 |
| ST IGNATIUS LOYOLA ACADEMY | $75,000 |
| CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL | $70,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $70,000 |
| CARDINAL SHEHAN SCHOOL | $68,750 |
| SISTERS CIRCLE | $65,450 |
| SETON SHRINE | $64,840 |
| SISTERS ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE | $62,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
118 repeat relationships — 72 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $635k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC4× · 2020–2023 · $314k · revenue +21%
- SCSisters Circle Inc4× · 2020–2024 · $284k · revenue +4%
- FCFRANCISCAN CENTER INC4× · 2020–2024 · $211k · revenue +109%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $120k
- CHCATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INCone grant, 2022 · $110k
- STST TIMOTHY CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $101k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…
To nurture a love of learning in a small family-like environment by providing an extraordinary and proven montessori public school experience for families in baltimore city.
We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.
Maryland new directions' mission is to train and coach people facing career and life transitions to overcome barriers, restore self-belief, and acquire the skills and tools needed to secure employment on a path to a living wage.
The baltimore regional housing partnership expands housing choices for low-income families who have historically been excluded from housing in well-resourced areas.
The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.
Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…
Inspire volunteerism and connect motivated people and businesses to nonprofit organizations leading to stronger communities. our programs connect the right people with the right organizations.
As a statewide resource center, the school provides outreach, educational and residential services for students to reach their fullest potential by preparing them to be as successful, independent, and well-rounded contributing members of…
To advocate fair housing and improving tenant/landlord relations.
Repairing homes, revitalizing communities and rebuilding lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thread Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Thomas More Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
141 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 141 of the 263 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Sisters Circle Inc ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEXT ONE UP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE IGNITES BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds THREAD INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds NOTRE DAME OF MARYLAND UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT JUMPSTART INC ↗
- Who funds SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
- Who funds BEYOND SHELTER FREDERICK INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE SQUASHWISE INC ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds WEEKEND BACKPACKS BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds UEMPOWER OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds DYSLEXIA TUTORING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds MANNA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds PARKS AND PEOPLE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Kahlert Foundation Inc · Thomas Wilson Sanitarium for Children of Baltimore City · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Open Works Inc — 96% of income from government
- Cornerstone Community Housing Inc — 68% of income from government
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc — 40% of income from government
- Partners in Care Maryland Inc — 40% of income from government
- Casa of Baltimore County Inc — 38% of income from government
- Heartly House Inc — 33% of income from government
- The Baltimore Children's Museum Inc — 33% of income from government
- San Mar Children's Home Inc — 29% of income from government
- Paul's Place Inc — 29% of income from government
- Maryland Association of Non-Profit Organizations — 27% of income from government
- Asylee Women Enterprise Inc — 26% of income from government
- First Fruits Farm Inc — 26% of income from government
- Baltimore Squashwise Inc — 23% of income from government
- Family Crisis Center of Baltimore County Inc — 21% of income from government
- Intersection of Change Inc — 20% of income from government
- The House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
- Washington County Commission On Aging Inc/Area Agency On Aging — 19% of income from government
- Vehicles for Change Inc — 16% of income from government
- Harford Family House Inc — 14% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Black Women Build - Baltimore Inc — 10% of income from government
- Notre Dame of Maryland University Inc — 9% of income from government
- Harford Community Action Agency Inc — 9% of income from government
- The Family Tree Inc — 9% of income from government
- Pro Bono Counseling Project Inc — 8% of income from government
- Community Assistance Network Inc — 7% of income from government
- B&o Railroad Museum Inc — 7% of income from government
- Center Stage Associates Inc — 7% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
- Interfaith Service Coalition of Hancock Maryland Inc — 5% of income from government
- Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
- The Women's Housing Coalition Inc — 2% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Marian House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
- Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
- Mount Saint Mary's University Inc — 0% of income from government
- Gilchrist Hospice Care Inc — 0% of income from government
- University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Comfort Cases Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.