Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

PROJECT GLIMMER

PROJECT GLIMMER (California) receives grants from 54 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,577,904 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($866,670). 29 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 68% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$40M
Funders on record
54
Grants received
$4.6M
Net assets
$11M
29/54 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%
01What it does

What Project Glimmer does

Mission

Project Glimmer is dedicated to inspiring every girl to envision and realize an empowered future.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Project Glimmer is a national nonprofit organization that aims to inspire all girls to envision and realize an empowered future. Since its founding in 2010, they have positively impacted more than one million teenage girls and women in all 50 states from underserved communities, with an emphasis on foster youth. Project Glimmers programs, such as gifts + goods, empowerment events, 1:1 coaching, and empowerment academy, are dedicated to breaking the cycle of poverty and helping end gender and racial inequality.

    $22,544,067 spent$23,712,846 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2023 Form 990. Program spending in total: $22,544,067.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($3.9M) Expenses 100 ($3.9M) Net assets 100 ($1.3M)2019 Revenue 259 ($10M) Expenses 224 ($8.7M) Net assets 202 ($2.7M)2020 Revenue 323 ($13M) Expenses 234 ($9.1M) Net assets 461 ($6.1M)2021 Revenue 233 ($9.0M) Expenses 281 ($11M) Net assets 333 ($4.4M)2022 Revenue 357 ($14M) Expenses 367 ($14M) Net assets 264 ($3.5M)2023 Revenue 611 ($24M) Expenses 587 ($23M) Net assets 350 ($4.7M)2024 Revenue 1036 ($40M) Expenses 884 ($34M) Net assets 805 ($11M)
2018201920202021202220232024
Revenue (1036)Expenses (884)Net assets (805)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $4.7M to $11M (+128%).

$1.3M
$2.7M
$6.2M
$4.5M
$3.6M
$4.7M
$11M
2018201920202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of PROJECT GLIMMER’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,405 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

−$6k
’18
$1.4M
’19
$3.5M
’20
−$1.9M
’21
−$416k
’22
$893k
’23
$5.9M
’24
0.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Christine Death

CEO & executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2018 and FY2019 filings.

2018201920202021202220232024
Listed23222621212221
Joined·+5+4+2+0+1+3
No longer listed·607004
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 23 funders, grant income rose $92k → $770k.

20 of 54 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 68% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PROJECT GLIMMER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 54 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROJECT GLIMMER has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 19% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

73% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PROJECT GLIMMER.

19%
largest funder
45%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 54% · 2018 23% · 2019 51% · 2020 18% · 2021 34% · 2022 30% · 2023 32% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

46% of PROJECT GLIMMER's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 54% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

68% of PROJECT GLIMMER's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1.4M that is directly attributable, 82% of it comes from funders outside California, across 13 states.

WA
NY
MA
OR
NV
NJ
CA
CO
MO
MD
DE
NC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.1M arriving through sponsors registered in 13 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PROJECT GLIMMER runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,289 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin15% · top quartile
Months of reserve0.1mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)48% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,289 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Organizations like PROJECT GLIMMER

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

99% of spending goes to programs.

Program 99%Management 0%Fundraising 1%

Governance

22
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROJECT GLIMMER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PROJECT GLIMMER?
PROJECT GLIMMER (California) receives grants from 54 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,577,904 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($866,670). 29 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 68% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PROJECT GLIMMER have?
IRS filings report 54 organizations giving $4,577,904 in grants to PROJECT GLIMMER, 29 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROJECT GLIMMER?
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $866,670 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROJECT GLIMMER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Project Glimmer →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 54 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing