How much did T ROWE PRICE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of T ROWE PRICE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

innovation creativitycapitalmission-related

2021

youngcreativity innovationscoutseducationurbanpartnershipsjunior achievement

2022

creativity innovationspringsgirlscoutseducationurbaneducational

2023

empoweredcreativity innovationscoutsempowermentspringseducationgirls

2024

irvinecreativity innovationleadershipspringseducationgirlsscience

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 249 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k51 grants · $277k
$10k–50k164 grants · $2.8M
$50k–250k32 grants · $2.8M
$250k+2 grants · $5.9M

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$93M

Total assets

Largest grants

AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION (AOGF)$5,517,497
WATERFRONT PARTNERSHIP OF BALTIMORE INC$370,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION$207,000
NEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS$150,000
COPPIN STATE COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC$150,000
NATIONAL AQUARIUM INC$135,000
THREAD$125,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE$100,000
GIRLS WHO INVEST INC$100,000
THE RESOLUTION PROJECT INC$100,000
ECHOING GREEN$100,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$100,000
FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC$87,500
THE PEALE CENTER FOR BALTIMORE HISTORY AND ARCHITECTURE$85,000
ARTS EVERY DAY$85,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$59M · 263 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.

263 repeat relationships — 204 still active in FY2024, 59 since wound down; 45 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

263

Total granted

$59M

$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%

+47%

Still filing today

81%

66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BC
BALTIMORE CORPS
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +3504%
FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +121%
UO
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
5× · 2020–2024 · $963k · revenue +40%

Funded once

UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -16%
TF
THE FINANCIAL CLINICgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $475k · revenue +35%
IC
IGNITE CAPITAL INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +1350% · 52% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Family League of Baltimore City Inc

Family League of Baltimore works collaboratively to support data-informed, community-driven solutions that align resources to dismantle the systemic barriers which limit the possibilities for children, families, and communities

Human Services

Mentoring Mentors Inc

Mentoring Mentors is a Baltimore-based non-profit dedicated to developing future community leaders through exposure that leads to college and career readiness.

Youth Development

Greater Baltimore Committee Inc

To provide a strong, unified and effective voice for the business community in the functional area of urban affairs and public policy, business services and information, and economic development, thereby promoting the Baltimore Region as…

—

Baltimore Hunger Project Llc

Baltimore hunger project removes the barriers to learning by providing food and resources to children facing food insecurity in our community.

Human Services

Baltimore Curriculum Project Inc

Build an efficient and detailed curriculum for all interested baltimore city public schools.

Education

Baltimore Green Space a Land Trustfor Community-Managed Open Space in

Baltimore Green Space is a land trust that partners with communities to preserve and support community gardens , forest patches , pocket parks , and other community-managed spaces.

Environment

Business Volunteers Maryland Inc

Inspire volunteerism and connect motivated people and businesses to nonprofit organizations leading to stronger communities. our programs connect the right people with the right organizations.

Community Improvement

Emerging Technology Centers Inc

To foster a transformative community of tech-savvy, innovative, entrepreneurial people looking for creative collaboration to accelerate their growth potential and make a powerful economic impact on the City of Baltimore and beyond.

Community Improvement

Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education

Metropolitan Baltimore Council of

The mission of the metropolititan baltimore council afl-cio unions is to improve the lives of working families to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our state and the nation.

—

Baltimore Regional Housing Partnership

Expands housing choices of low-income families in safe & economically vibrant communities.

Housing & Shelter

Maryland Center On Economic Policy Inc

The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Working in Support of Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Goucher College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%4/323

the rest of the field

10%

2,878/29,019

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

311 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

131

Early backer (in before they grew)

303/311

Grantees still filing

251/311

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$42,311,841Education$5,251,500Arts & Culture$3,992,820Human Services$3,390,975Community Improvement$3,270,000Youth Development$2,149,250Employment$1,974,625

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD192× affinity149 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg · The Jacob and Hilda Blaustein · The Morris Goldseker Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Robert W Deutsch Foundation · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation T ROWE PRICE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

Unified Efforts Inc — 100% of income from government
Open Works Inc — 96% of income from government
Roca Inc — 78% of income from government
Baltimore Arts Realty Corporation — 77% of income from government
Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
Govans Ecumenical Development Corp — 28% of income from government
First Fruits Farm Inc — 26% of income from government
Arts Education in Maryland Schools — 23% of income from government
Baltimore Squashwise Inc — 23% of income from government
Intersection of Change Inc — 20% of income from government
House of Ruth Maryland Inc — 19% of income from government
Moveable Feast Inc — 18% of income from government
Chesapeake Shakespeare Company — 16% of income from government
Uplift Alliance Inc — 16% of income from government
CityLit Project Inc — 15% of income from government
Neighborhood Design Center Inc — 14% of income from government
Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
The Baltimore Station Inc — 11% of income from government
The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
Parity Baltimore Incorporated — 11% of income from government
Cash Campaign of Maryland Inc — 11% of income from government
The Peale Center for Baltimore History — 8% of income from government
Maryland New Directions Inc — 8% of income from government
Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake — 7% of income from government
Morgan State University Foundation Inc — 7% of income from government
The Producers Club of Md Inc — 7% of income from government
The Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
Banner Neighborhoods Community Corp — 6% of income from government
Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
Stevenson University — 6% of income from government
Greater Baltimore Cultural Alliance Inc — 5% of income from government
Arts Every Day Inc — 4% of income from government
Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
Beloved Community Services Corporation — 3% of income from government
Wide Angle Youth Media Inc — 3% of income from government
Digital Harbor Foundation — 2% of income from government
Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
Arts for Learning Maryland Inc — 1% of income from government
National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
Holistic Life Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

69get no government money at all

5rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~32 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 521194738 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 32 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 66% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to T Rowe Price Foundation?

Find your warmest path to T Rowe Price Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

T ROWE PRICE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

311 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to T Rowe Price Foundation?

More from the funding graph

T ROWE PRICE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

311 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to T Rowe Price Foundation?

More from the funding graph