Loading…
Loading…
Arizona · Nonprofit
FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION (Arizona) is funded by 125 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $10,326,796 in grants to it, the largest being ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($1,130,488). 67 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 9,516 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,516 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
88% of FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 8 funders to 9 as grant income moved $85k → $702k.
19 of 125 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 28% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 125 funders by total. Association, not causation.
FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 11% of grant income, and it takes 8 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 8 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 29% · 2018 57% · 2019 17% · 2020 14% · 2021 14% · 2022 26% · 2023 10% · 2024 20% · 2025 48% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
33% of FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 54% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION is locally rooted: 54% of its grant income comes from Arizona funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 125 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
76% of spending goes to programs.
88%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 125funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing