Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

National Philanthropic Trust

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ("npt") is a public charity dedicated to increasing philanthropy in society by providing philanthropic expertise to donors, foundations and financial institutions, enabling them to realize their philanthropic aspirations (see schedule o).

$6.4B
Granted FY2025still arriving
22,258
Grants FY2025still arriving
53
States reached
$285M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$8.4BPhilanthropy$7.2BHealth$2.4BInternational$2.0BArts & Culture$2.0BReligion$1.4BHuman Services$1.3BEnvironment$1.2BOther$0
02FY2025 · 22258 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 22,258 grants below total $5,990,120,484 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,415,072,479 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $424,951,995 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3413 grants · $24M
  • $10k–50k11619 grants · $236M
  • $50k–250k5053 grants · $518M
  • $250k+2173 grants · $5.2B
$24,000
Median grant
53
States reached
$56.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$284,919,786
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$265,751,500
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$91,743,377
JEREMY AND HANNELORE GRANTHAM ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST$90,171,802
LOS ALTOS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$85,223,341
FOUNDERS PLEDGE INC$78,816,791
CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION$75,741,189
XQ INSTITUTE$71,266,557
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$65,421,530
LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION$65,022,500
LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$65,000,000
THE RAND CORPORATION$61,646,790
SELF HELP VENTURES FUND$60,000,000
GRAMEEN AMERICA INC$55,220,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$54,195,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $826.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS HOME DBA BOYS TOWN: $20.0M → 12%NATIONAL INDIGENOUS WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER: $5.0M → 18%PHILADELPHIA FREEDOM VALLEY YMCA: $18.0M → 7%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CAPITAL DISTRICT: $10.0M → 14%YMCA OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $18.0M → 10%YMCA OF CASS AND CLAY COUNTIES: $10.0M → 12%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OMAHA: $10.0M → 12%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $18.0M → 10%LEVITICUS 25 23 ALTERNATIVE FUND INC: $8.0M → 9%CENTRAL FLORIDA YMCA FOUNDATION INC: $10.0M → 13%PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $10.0M → 17%DECATUR FAMILY YMCA: $18.0M → 14%YMCA OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS: $10.0M → 16%YMCA OF CLEVELAND OHIO INC: $10.0M → 17%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $5.0M → 11%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DELAWARE: $10.0M → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $6.0M → 11%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $46.7M → 9%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $10.0M → 14%PRIME COALITION INC: $5.0M → 14%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES: $18.0M → 11%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $25.0M → 17%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $4.4M → 17%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $20.1M → 16%CHILD TRENDS: $10.0M → 8%FAMILY INDEPENDENCE INITIATIVE: $40.2M → 10%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $65.0M → 11%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $8.0M → 16%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $7.0M → 16%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $10.0M → 11%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $5.0M → 16%ASIAN COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE: $5.0M → 9%FAMILY INDEPENDENCE INITIATIVE: $10.8M → 10%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $18.0M → 9%CENTERING HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE INC: $4.0M → 16%STUDENT VETERANS OF AMERICA: $8.0M → 14%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $7.0M → 14%LEGAL PRIORITIES INC: $5.0M → 16%EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $5.9M → 14%GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA: $7.8M → 17%TIDES CENTER: $8.7M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $5.6M → 10%MATRICULATE: $3.6M → 17%EQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL JUSTICE: $4.8M → 14%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $150.0M → 17%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $50.0M → 17%YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK: $18.0M → 17%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $15.1M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16.3B · 1557 repeat orgs$2.6B to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.

1557 repeat relationships — 1334 still active in FY2025, 223 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1557
251

Total granted

$16.3B
$2.2B

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-14%

Still filing today

91%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $408M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $679M · revenue +64%
  • BM
    BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC
    3× · 2018–2024 · $247M · revenue +677% · 75% of their budget
  • TJ
    THE JEREMY AND HANNELORE GRANTHAM ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST
    6× · 2020–2025 · $232M · revenue +92% · 70% of their budget

Funded once

  • CI
    CLIMATE IMPERATIVE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $105M · revenue 0% · 38% of their budget
  • CA
    CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF STUDIO ARTS INC FKA BM-A INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $83M · 95% of their budget
  • N4
    National 4-H Council
    one grant, 2022 · $50M · revenue -63% · 39% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…

—
2
United States Naval Institute

To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.

—
3
University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education
4
University of Denver

A higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education
5
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
6
Oklahoma City University

Oklahoma city university prepares all learners to create, lead and serve.

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
10
Foreign Policy Research Institute

Highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on u.s. foreign policy

International
11
The Common Application Inc

The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

Education
12
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Catalyst Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sesame Workshop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesYmca Youth DevelopmentYouth Development CentersImmigrant Worker SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Community College Foundatio…Christian Missionary Organi…School District FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Dance Arts OrganizationsAffordable Housing Construc…Local Food System Organizat…Elementary Literacy TutoringOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Equine Therapy ProgramsFaith-Based Social ServicesCommunity Food PantriesPublic Library OperationsSchool Parent OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Christian Youth CampsAddiction Recovery ServicesYouth Development ServicesCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterFood Banks and PantriesSenior Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Local History MuseumsCancer Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Arts CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%26%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%268/27,923
the rest of the field
11%
205,898/1,791,642

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1852 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1852 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

628
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
182
Early backer (in before they grew)
1839/1852
Grantees still filing
1250/1852
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Silicon Valley Community Foundation — $1,803,505,364 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community FoundationDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $451,441,381 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $365,659,612 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation IncTHE JEREMY AND HANNELORE GRANTHAM ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST — $232,331,393 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $207,602,368 · Philanthropy+38 more — $2,268,433,768 · Philanthropy+38 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $679,439,873 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $336,684,165 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF …XQ INSTITUTE — $255,616,644 · EducationXQ INSTITUTEPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $215,122,164 · EducationPresident and Fellows of …+43 more — $2,013,351,997 · Education+43 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $951,653,210 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY IN…LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $105,074,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITI…Self-Help Ventures Fund — $105,000,000 · Community ImprovementSelf-Help V…GRAMEEN AMERICA INC — $85,720,000 · Community ImprovementGRAMEEN AME…PIDC COMMUNITY CAPITAL — $55,712,700 · Community Improvement+8 more — $282,364,064 · Community Improvement+8 moreVITAL STRATEGIES INC — $186,378,578 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $90,363,432 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $54,690,980 · InternationalINKOMOKO — $41,275,406 · InternationalHIAS INC — $36,347,935 · InternationalONE ACRE FUND — $35,633,842 · InternationalThe End Fund Inc — $33,340,212 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $32,840,732 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $32,762,419 · InternationalAFSNC INC — $32,681,500 · InternationalGAVI ALLIANCE — $31,875,000 · InternationalCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $31,660,257 · InternationalAVINA AMERICAS INC — $30,213,257 · InternationalMIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $29,354,950 · International+7 more — $178,547,133 · InternationalLUCAS MUSEUM OF NARRATIVE ART — $497,500,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art — $47,977,042 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Opera Association Inc — $47,012,372 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $43,891,001 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILOS PROJECT INC — $37,879,268 · Arts & CultureBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $36,200,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $34,750,366 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $50,497,385 · Arts & CulturePARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $122,037,201 · OtherBLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC — $246,737,186 · OtherBLUE MERIDIAN PARTNE…Stand Together Foundation — $106,247,000 · OtherSLOUGH FARM FOUNDATION — $97,711,000 · OtherCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION — $114,249,589 · Other+56 more — $2,038,177,285 · Other+56 moreNEW VENTURE FUND — $343,292,650 · EnvironmentCLIMATE IMPERATIVE FOUNDATION — $104,600,000 · EnvironmentWINDWARD FUND — $60,326,493 · EnvironmentNIA TERO FOUNDATION — $53,543,680 · EnvironmentELEMENTAL EXCELERATOR INC — $30,486,567 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $24,736,948 · Environment
Philanthropy$5,328,973,886Education$3,500,214,843Community Improvement$1,585,523,974International$877,965,633Arts & Culture$795,707,434Other$2,725,159,261Environment$616,986,338

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $1,803,505,364 over 9y, 16% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $951,653,210 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $679,439,873 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetLUCAS MUSEUM OF NARRATIVE ART — $497,500,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $451,441,381 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $365,659,612 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $343,292,650 over 9y, 12% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $336,684,165 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetXQ INSTITUTE — $255,616,644 over 4y, 87% of budgetBLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC — $246,737,186 over 3y, 75% of budgetTHE JEREMY AND HANNELORE GRANTHAM ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST — $232,331,393 over 6y, 70% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $215,122,164 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $207,602,368 over 8y, 12% of budgetVITAL STRATEGIES INC — $186,378,578 over 7y, 25% of budgetGreater Horizons — $174,034,049 over 4y, 18% of budgetGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $172,222,404 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $160,683,031 over 7y, 6.4% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $144,552,641 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $142,607,783 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $122,037,201 over 9y, 19% of budgetCLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION — $114,249,589 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetStand Together Foundation — $106,247,000 over 6y, 93% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $105,074,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetSelf-Help Ventures Fund — $105,000,000 over 2y, 74% of budgetCLIMATE IMPERATIVE FOUNDATION — $104,600,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetTHE SEMINAR NETWORK INC — $103,075,000 over 7y, 99% of budgetCornell University — $99,883,991 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSLOUGH FARM FOUNDATION — $97,711,000 over 9y, 100% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $96,118,705 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetYale University — $95,236,392 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $94,475,545 over 9y, 17% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $90,363,432 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetIMPACTASSETSINC — $89,989,423 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetNeubauer Family Charitable Trust — $88,482,417 over 3y, 69% of budgetFOUNDERS PLEDGE INC — $87,897,958 over 6y, 22% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $87,494,883 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetGRAMEEN AMERICA INC — $85,720,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetLOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $85,264,091 over 6y, 93% of budgetCALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF STUDIO ARTS INC FKA BM-A INSTITUTE — $83,105,000 over 1y, 95% of budgetChicago Cred Inc — $80,957,326 over 4y, 89% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $76,268,233 over 9y, 65% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $73,430,806 over 9y, 16% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $66,119,531 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $61,883,540 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWINDWARD FUND — $60,326,493 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $58,696,749 over 9y, 8.4% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $58,464,618 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $57,876,617 over 9y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LUCAS MUSEUM OF NARRATIVE ART ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds XQ INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEREMY AND HANNELORE GRANTHAM ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds VITAL STRATEGIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Horizons ↗
  • Who funds GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Stand Together Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Self-Help Ventures Fund ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE IMPERATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SEMINAR NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds SLOUGH FARM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
  • Who funds Neubauer Family Charitable Trust ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDERS PLEDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds GRAMEEN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF STUDIO ARTS INC FKA BM-A INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Cred Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

John and Kathleen Sch…The Samuel and Ronnie…Lisa & Michael Leffel…The Gaudio Family Fou…Tina & Steven Price C…Oberndorf Family Foun…The Nararo FoundationGray FoundationPenner Family Foundat…Carson Family Charita…Jvz FoundationHoffen Family Foundat…
John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber PhilanthropyIL20.9× affinity104 shared granteesties to 2 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · The Samuel and Ronnie Heyman Family Foundation · Lisa & Michael Leffell Foundation · The Gaudio Family Foundation · Tina & Steven Price Charitable Foundation · Oberndorf Family Foundation · The Nararo Foundation · Gray Foundation · Penner Family Foundation Inc · Carson Family Charitable Trust · Jvz Foundation · Hoffen Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Philanthropic Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America — 21% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Community Catalyst Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Social Finance Inc — 12% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • Root Capital Inc — 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Upstream Usa Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Williams College — 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home