Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC
LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,234,046 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($11,280,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 98% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2024
- $7.9M
- Funders on record
- 14
- Grants received
- $14M
- Net assets
- $9.0M
What Leadexposureeliminationprojectinc does
Mission
Eliminate childhood lead poisoning and improve the health, wellbeing, and potential of children worldwide. We start with one important source lead paint.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Program
Leep works to eliminate childhood lead poisoning from paint by generating evidence, strengthening regulation, and supporting industry reformulation. In fy25, leep completed paint studies in 4 countries cote divoire, rwanda, malawi, and pakistan and shared results with key stakeholders to identify where lead paint remains available on the market, guiding targeted program interventions. Leep-initiated paint programs launched in 11 new countries following leeps studies and support, 6 countries announced intentions to introduce lead paint regulation, and 2 countries introduced regulation. Leep also provided technical assistance to help paint manufacturers reformulate, engaging the vast majority of lead paint manufacturers by market share in 9 countries - in 2 of those countries, more than 50 of market share took active reformulation steps, and in 1 country, 100 of market share did so. See schedule o
$2,647,705 spentof which $138,561 as grants100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $2,647,705.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2023, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2023, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $2.3M to $9.0M (+295%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
97% of LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
9 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 98% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 79% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
98% of LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $260k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 3 states.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $14M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,607 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,607 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Organizations like LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington, D.C.
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
94% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
0%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC?
- LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,234,046 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($11,280,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 98% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC have?
- IRS filings report 14 organizations giving $14,234,046 in grants to LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC?
- NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $11,280,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like LEADEXPOSUREELIMINATIONPROJECTINC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2023–2024), and the filings of 14 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing