Loading…
Loading…
Ohio · Nonprofit
THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION (Ohio) is funded by 310 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $182,610,735 in grants to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($19,228,502). 174 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION is better cushioned than half of the 1,388 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,388 health nonprofits over $100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 2%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
5% of THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (1% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$1.4M from 12 funders in 2025, up from $2.3M and 39 in 2017.
97 of 310 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 42% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 310 funders by total. Association, not causation.
THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 11% of grant income, and it takes 10 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 10 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 21% · 2018 26% · 2019 13% · 2020 10% · 2021 21% · 2022 14% · 2023 13% · 2024 20% · 2025 59% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
37% of THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION draws 79% of its grant income from funders outside Ohio — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 34 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 310 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
90% of spending goes to programs.
52%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 20 states
Part of a family of 62 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 310funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing