Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

RESULTS FOR AMERICA

RESULTS FOR AMERICA (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $156,168,201 to it, the largest being BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC ($34,060,000). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$17M
Funders on record
23
Grants received
$156M
Net assets
$32M
16/23 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Results for America does

Mission

Results for America helps governments find, fund, and implement solutions that measurably improve economic mobility. Rfa's mission is to make investing in what works the "new normal", so that government decision-makers will regularly and effectively use evidence and data to increase the impact of government spending to improve the lives of young people, their families and communities.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Standards of excellence: Results for America works to build the capacity of government decision makers and non-profit leaders to implement evidence-based practices, with the long-term goal of helping them make more effective use of resources, to scale effective solutions, and to achieve better outcomes for their residents. Our standards of excellence - what works cities certification, state standard of excellence, and federal standard of excellence - help governments benchmark their existing data and evidence capacity and provide a roadmap for how to accelerate their progress and deliver better results.

    $19,053,654 spentof which $6,577,371 as grants$751,297 earned by the program
    74% of program spending
  2. Implementation support: rfa helps government decision-makers implement policies, practices and systems around three issues: (1) education: helps states, school districts and schools build and use evidence to improve outcomes for our nation's students, which includes the state education fellows program and edresearch for recovery program. (2) economic mobility: helps local government leaders identify evidence-based approaches to their economic mobility-related challenges through our economic mobility catalog and implement promising ideas through solutions sprints. (3) workforce: helps state and local workforce leaders improve outcomes for job seekers and employers by investing federal, state, and local workforce dollars in evidence-based, results-driven solutions through our state & local workforce fellowship and good jobs and equity project.

    $4,835,764 spentof which $50,000 as grants
    19% of program spending
  3. Movement building: rfa continues to build a movement around evidence-based policymaking with the current goal of getting the majority of "early adopters" of the practices to support and implement evidence-based policies. To accomplish this goal, rfa communicates research and solutions to policy makers at all levels of government and to the general public, through a variety of channels and media.

    $1,715,945 spent
    7% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $25,605,363.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($9.5M) Expenses 100 ($8.6M) Net assets 100 ($3.5M)2018 Revenue 194 ($18M) Expenses 93 ($8.0M) Net assets 392 ($14M)2019 Revenue 142 ($13M) Expenses 145 ($12M) Net assets 422 ($15M)2020 Revenue 179 ($17M) Expenses 177 ($15M) Net assets 471 ($17M)2021 Revenue 395 ($37M) Expenses 233 ($20M) Net assets 961 ($34M)2022 Revenue 260 ($25M) Expenses 270 ($23M) Net assets 993 ($35M)2023 Revenue 341 ($32M) Expenses 334 ($29M) Net assets 1115 ($40M)2024 Revenue 178 ($17M) Expenses 288 ($25M) Net assets 902 ($32M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (178)Expenses (288)Net assets (902)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $18M to $35M (+90%).

$3.8M
$14M
$15M
$18M
$35M
$37M
$41M
$33M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 2%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

79% of RESULTS FOR AMERICA’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (23% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,251 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$902k
’17
$10M
’18
$1.1M
’19
$1.7M
’20
$17M
’21
$1.5M
’22
$3.7M
’23
−$7.8M
’24
9.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Michele Jolin

President & CEO

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1118131214161618
Joined·+8+2+2+5+5+3+5
No longer listed·1733333
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose $2.7M → $32M.

8 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 38% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RESULTS FOR AMERICA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RESULTS FOR AMERICA has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 22% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

60% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RESULTS FOR AMERICA.

22%
largest funder
55%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 56% · 2018 57% · 2019 67% · 2020 34% · 2021 50% · 2022 37% · 2023 36% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of RESULTS FOR AMERICA's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 70% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

RESULTS FOR AMERICA draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 9 states in all.

WA
MI
NY
IN
CA
OK
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $59M arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

RESULTS FOR AMERICA holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 4,064 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−46% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve9.8mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,064 education nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Organizations like RESULTS FOR AMERICA

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 7%Fundraising 3%

Governance

11
board members
91%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

64%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 15 states

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
DC
OK

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RESULTS FOR AMERICA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RESULTS FOR AMERICA?
RESULTS FOR AMERICA (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $156,168,201 to it, the largest being BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC ($34,060,000). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does RESULTS FOR AMERICA have?
IRS filings report 23 organizations giving $156,168,201 in grants to RESULTS FOR AMERICA, 16 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RESULTS FOR AMERICA?
BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC is the largest funder on record, with $34,060,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RESULTS FOR AMERICA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 23 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing