Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc

Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 186 organizations whose IRS filings report $130,936,256 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($27,342,250). 118 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 53% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$33M
Funders on record
186
Grants received
$131M
Net assets
$28M
118/186 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc does

Mission

To conduct research and provide education on national security and on international terrorism. See Schedule O for full mission

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Research: Provides research on national security, international relations, terrorism, and related issues on a timely basis and in response to the political and societal environment.

    $8,764,990 spent
    38% of program spending
  2. Communications and Government Relations: Educates the general public and policy audiences on issues related to national security, international relations, terrorism, and other issues related to the defense of democratic societies and institutions.

    $3,990,999 spentof which $900,000 as grants
    17% of program spending
  3. Iran Threat: Provides policy research, analysis, and education addressing Iran's support for terrorism and the pursuit of nuclear weapons.

    $2,384,604 spent
    10% of program spending
  4. Center on Economic and Financial Power: Examines how democracies can use sanctions as economic coercion, deter illicit finance, and defend themselves against economic warfare.

    $2,063,357 spent
    9% of program spending
  5. Center on Military and Political Power: Promotes understanding of the defense strategies, policies, and capabilities necessary to deter and defeat threats to the freedom, security, and prosperity of Americans and our allies by providing rigorous, timely, and relevant research and analysis.

    $1,503,485 spent
    7% of program spending
  6. Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation: Aims to promote a greater understanding of the threats and opportunities to national security posed by the rapidly expanding technological environment.

    $1,908,935 spent$128,718 earned by the program
    8% of program spending
  7. Extremism Projects: Conduct research and analysis of certain groups and nations that may cause harm to the US or other democratic allies.

    $1,482,896 spent
    6% of program spending
  8. Education and Training Programs: Provide mentoring, skill-building workshops, roundtables, and travel opportunities to mid-career professionals working in various aspects of national security and public policy.

    $932,621 spent
    4% of program spending

The 8 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $23,031,887.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($13M) Expenses 100 ($13M) Net assets 100 ($19M)2018 Revenue 95 ($12M) Expenses 112 ($15M) Net assets 87 ($16M)2019 Revenue 247 ($33M) Expenses 127 ($17M) Net assets 170 ($32M)2020 Revenue 114 ($15M) Expenses 126 ($17M) Net assets 160 ($30M)2021 Revenue 122 ($16M) Expenses 132 ($18M) Net assets 152 ($29M)2022 Revenue 140 ($18M) Expenses 149 ($20M) Net assets 143 ($27M)2023 Revenue 181 ($24M) Expenses 190 ($25M) Net assets 136 ($26M)2024 Revenue 247 ($33M) Expenses 231 ($31M) Net assets 147 ($28M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (247)Expenses (231)Net assets (147)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $19M to $35M (+82%).

$22M
$19M
$35M
$33M
$32M
$33M
$32M
$41M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 1% · 2019 1% · 2020 3% · 2021 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

98% of Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (96% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 391 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$191k
’17
−$2.5M
’18
$16M
’19
−$1.9M
’20
−$1.6M
’21
−$1.6M
’22
−$1.5M
’23
$1.6M
’24
3.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Mark Dubowitz

CEO

Board chair

Timothy Gordon

Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2222293032303334
Joined·+3+9+2+8+2+5+5
No longer listed·3216424
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 33 funders to 83 funders, grant income rose $5.4M → $19M.

41 of 186 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 53% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 186 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 21% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

55% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc.

21%
largest funder
59%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 37% · 2018 33% · 2019 39% · 2020 35% · 2021 39% · 2022 28% · 2023 27% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

66% of Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

53% of Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $62M that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 27 states.

ME
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $69M arriving through sponsors registered in 20 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 363 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin5% · above the median
Months of reserve3.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 363 international nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Organizations like Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

74% of spending goes to programs.

Program 74%Management 16%Fundraising 9%

Governance

25
board members
92%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

84%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 15 states

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
KY
VA
MD
TN
NC
GA
FL

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • FDD Action · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc?
Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 186 organizations whose IRS filings report $130,936,256 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($27,342,250). 118 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 53% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc have?
IRS filings report 186 organizations giving $130,936,256 in grants to Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc, 118 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc?
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $27,342,250 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 186 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing