· Private foundation
John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k9 grants · $285k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+41 grants · $31M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Carter Center Inc | $3,000,000 |
| Reclaiming Chicago NFP | $3,000,000 |
| Lake Forest College | $2,500,000 |
| National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) | $2,375,000 |
| Big Shoulders Fund | $2,000,000 |
| Erie Family Health Foundation Inc | $1,500,000 |
| The Josselyn Center NFP | $1,326,087 |
| Allies for Community Business | $975,000 |
| Northern Illinois Food Bank | $860,000 |
| North Chicago Community Partners NFP | $855,000 |
| Cristo Rey St Martin College Prep | $800,000 |
| Loyola University of Chicago | $800,000 |
| Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago Inc | $750,000 |
| Transform Capital | $700,000 |
| Renew Communities NFP | $675,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $5.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
135 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 99 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LULOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO5× · 2020–2024 · $5.0M · revenue +23%
- BSBig Shoulders Fund5× · 2020–2024 · $4.4M · revenue +67%
- NINORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK5× · 2020–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +8%
Funded once
- CCCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicagoone grant, 2023 · $1.2M · revenue 0%
- LCLAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +63%
- NINational Immigrant Justice Centerone grant, 2020 · $500k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.
At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…
Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.
A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.
To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.
The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.
To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.
Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…
The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
To equip all students in grades six through twelve with the academic skills, intellectual habits and character traits to succeed in the college of their choice, strenghten their communities and change the world.
Providing academic support to children experiencing homelessness in Chicago and providing resources and services to families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Roberti Community House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
169 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 169 of the 214 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP ↗
- Who funds Erie Family Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RECLAIMING CHICAGO NFP ↗
- Who funds Cristo Rey St Martin College Prep ↗
- Who funds Lake Forest College ↗
- Who funds North Chicago Community Partners ↗
- Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
- Who funds ALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC ↗
- Who funds RENEW COMMUNITIES NFP ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago ↗
- Who funds DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds PADS Lake County Inc ↗
- Who funds START EARLY ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
- Who funds TRANSFORM CAPITAL ↗
- Who funds NICASA NFP ↗
- Who funds ARDEN SHORE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Lake County ↗
- Who funds Camp Blue Skies Foundation ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds City Colleges of Chicago Foundation ↗
- Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds CASA LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HIGHWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds THE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY FOR URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP ↗
- Who funds The Chicago Community Trust ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Lake County Community Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The Gorter Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · United Way of Lake County Inc · The Grainger Foundation Inc · First Bank Chicago Foundation · Healthcare Foundation of Northern Lake County · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Harold M & Adeline S Morrison Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.