Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

THE URBAN INSTITUTE

THE URBAN INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 254 organizations whose IRS filings report $401,027,329 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($71,005,444). 151 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$130M
Funders on record
254
Grants received
$401M
Net assets
$235M
151/254 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 47%
01What it does

What The Urban Institute does

Mission

The Urban Institute is a nonprofit research organization that drives impact by equipping changemakers with evidence and solutions to create a future where every person and community has the opportunity and power to thrive.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Social sciences - research and public policy analysis: the research to action lab is an innovation hub serving decisionmakers and creative thinkers eager to effect social change. We draw on the breadth and depth of The Urban Institute's research insights to test new strategies and develop cutting-edge tools, programs, and trainings, as well as provide strategic and philanthropic advice to public, nonprofit, and private-sector leaders. Nimble and creative, the lab takes an integrated approach to helping decisionmakers navigate current challenges and seize future opportunities in localities throughout the united states. Our multidisciplinary team offers expertise in identifying and cultivating approaches that shape public debate, improve decisionmaking, and spark disruptive solutions to today's complex social and economic challenges.

    $20,028,982 spentof which $3,080,407 as grants
    17% of program spending
  2. Social sciences - research and public policy analysis: at the center on labor, human services, and population, we study how family, youth, and individual well-being is shaped by economic, social, and demographic trends, and how policies and programs can improve economic security, work, and child welfare and development. Understanding how families are faring in the face of economic pressures, demographic change, and public health and social challenges is essential for policymakers and practitioners who oversee social services and programs. Our research explores the implications of these changes for people and policies.

    $18,395,637 spentof which $1,551,288 as grants
    16% of program spending
  3. Social sciences - research and public policy analysis: the income and benefits policy center gives decisionmakers crucial information by predicting how policy changes will affect people, programs, and government. We analyze family economic well-being from childhood through retirement and undertake research on a wide variety of issues, including income support, social insurance, taxes, and child support; education and training programs and policies; employers, workplaces, and the labor market; and workforce development systems and policies. As technological and demographic shifts transform the nature of jobs, our experts on postsecondary education and workforce development study what skills workers will need in the future and what challenges lie ahead for retirees. Our research explores the implications of these changes for people and policies.

    $14,922,549 spentof which $397,635 as grants
    13% of program spending
  4. Urban conducted additional programmatic activities including research and data analysis, convenings, data tools and modeling, strategic advising, program evaluation, and community engagement, that focused on economic and social policy issues that affect the well-being of people and communities.

    $64,438,985 spentof which $5,372,987 as grants$46,571 earned by the program
    55% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $117,786,153.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($86M) Expenses 100 ($93M) Net assets 100 ($158M)2018 Revenue 103 ($89M) Expenses 98 ($91M) Net assets 93 ($147M)2019 Revenue 147 ($127M) Expenses 107 ($99M) Net assets 121 ($191M)2020 Revenue 133 ($114M) Expenses 113 ($105M) Net assets 135 ($213M)2021 Revenue 197 ($170M) Expenses 124 ($115M) Net assets 165 ($261M)2022 Revenue 182 ($156M) Expenses 138 ($128M) Net assets 156 ($246M)2023 Revenue 145 ($125M) Expenses 148 ($138M) Net assets 156 ($246M)2024 Revenue 151 ($130M) Expenses 159 ($148M) Net assets 149 ($235M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (151)Expenses (159)Net assets (149)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $297M to $348M (+17%).

$180M
$170M
$215M
$250M
$297M
$348M
$342M
$312M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 46% · 2018 42% · 2019 28% · 2020 34% · 2021 25% · 2022 25% · 2023 33% · 2024 31%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$7.1M
’17
−$2.2M
’18
$27M
’19
$9.3M
’20
$54M
’21
$28M
’22
−$13M
’23
−$19M
’24
2.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Sarah Rosen Wartell

President and chief executive officer

Board chair

Jamie S Gorelick

Chair (through 11/2024)

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 48 funders to 93 funders, grant income rose $25M → $46M.

44 of 254 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE URBAN INSTITUTE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 254 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE URBAN INSTITUTE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 18% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

18%
largest funder
44%
top three
~13
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 39% · 2018 37% · 2019 26% · 2020 22% · 2021 20% · 2022 31% · 2023 17% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

47% of THE URBAN INSTITUTE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 59% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

THE URBAN INSTITUTE draws 96% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 33 states in all.

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $43M arriving through sponsors registered in 21 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding THE URBAN INSTITUTE receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $278.5M on record — $277.6M federal, $916k state.

Federal$277.6M
grants $102.0Mcontracts $175.6M
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$122.9M
  • Department of Labor$66.3M
  • Department of Justice$39.3M
  • Department of Education$13.2M
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$9.5M
  • General Services Administration$7.0M
State$916k
04
05
06
07
09
19
21
22
23
24
By state
  • DE$426k
  • NJ$381k
  • OR$50k
  • MA$38k
  • CT$20k
  • FL$115

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like THE URBAN INSTITUTE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 17%Fundraising 4%

Governance

32
board members
97%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 28 states

NH
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
RI
CA
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
MS
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE URBAN INSTITUTE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE URBAN INSTITUTE?
THE URBAN INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 254 organizations whose IRS filings report $401,027,329 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($71,005,444). 151 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE URBAN INSTITUTE have?
IRS filings report 254 organizations giving $401,027,329 in grants to THE URBAN INSTITUTE, 151 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE URBAN INSTITUTE?
GATES FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $71,005,444 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE URBAN INSTITUTE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 254 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing