Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND

VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND (California) receives grants from 91 organizations whose IRS filings report $48,954,326 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($12,645,418). 62 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 59% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$22M
Funders on record
91
Grants received
$49M
Net assets
$16M
62/91 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Village Enterprise Fund does

Mission

Village enterprise's mission is to end extreme poverty in rural africa through entrepreneurship and innovation. Partnering with governments, nonprofits, united nations agencies, conservation organizations, and private sector companies, (see schedule o)

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The delivering resilient enterprises and market systems (dreams) project provides innovative solution that drives refugee self-reliance. The project is cofunded by five foundations and it aims to provide two hundred thousand of the most vulnerable refugees in uganda and ethiopia.

    $5,425,322 spentof which $3,874,003 as grants
    32% of program spending
  2. Catholic relief services (crs)-nawiri - crs and the consortium that Village Enterprise Fund is a member of were awarded a federal cooperative agreement from usaid to implement the usaid mfumo imara lishe endelevu (mile) program in delivering a multisectoral package of services to support local institutions to sustainably reduce persistent acute malnutrition among vulnerable subpopulations of isiolo and marsabit counties in kenya. Village enterprise leads a poverty graduation program by building on its entrepreneurial foundation that has supported new enterprises in kenya.

    $987,009 spentof which $68,384 as grants
    6% of program spending
  3. Village Enterprise Fund was awarded a federal cooperative agreement from usaid to implement the usaid scaling sustainable poverty graduation program in rwanda. The program supports first-time entrepreneurs in moving beyond extreme poverty by equipping them with the resources, knowledge, and leadership skills needed to start sustainable businesses and savings groups. Through this program, village enterprise aims to exponentially scale its cost-effective, innovative, and evidence-based graduation approach, both by expanding direct implementation in rwanda and by fostering replication and adoption of the model by the government of rwanda and other african countries. The goal is to reach 10 million beneficiaries within ten years.

    $985,276 spentof which $311,034 as grants
    6% of program spending
  4. The bill & melinda gates foundation supported program strengthened the scalability and sustainability of village enterprise's ultra-poor graduation (upg) model in kenya through government and private sector integration. The program advanced partnerships with county governments by supporting policy development, building institutional capacity, and implementing management information systems to enable local ownership and delivery of poverty graduation programs. In addition, the initiative piloted an innovative approach that integrates upg with market systems development, linking participants to private sector actors and value chains to strengthen the growth and sustainability of microenterprises. The program also generated learning to inform national-level social protection programs and contribute to the evolution of economic inclusion strategies in kenya.

    $827,441 spentof which $101,880 as grants
    5% of program spending
  5. The greater impact foundation (gif) project supported the expansion of village enterprise's rural microenterprise development program in kenya and uganda. The program delivered entrepreneurship training, seed capital, and business mentorship to vulnerable households in west pokot and mt. Elgon (kenya), and gulu and soroti (uganda), enabling the establishment of new microenterprises and strengthening household income generation. The initiative incorporated program efficiency improvements to expand outreach and cost-effectiveness, and included monitoring of previously supported businesses to inform learning and continuous improvement of the model.

    $643,759 spentof which $352,771 as grants
    4% of program spending
  6. Other program services

    $8,208,185 spentof which $2,501,007 as grants
    48% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $17,076,992.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.6M) Expenses 100 ($2.8M) Net assets 100 ($1.5M)2018 Revenue 124 ($4.4M) Expenses 115 ($3.2M) Net assets 184 ($2.7M)2019 Revenue 126 ($4.5M) Expenses 145 ($4.0M) Net assets 217 ($3.2M)2020 Revenue 146 ($5.2M) Expenses 148 ($4.1M) Net assets 293 ($4.4M)2021 Revenue 159 ($5.7M) Expenses 171 ($4.7M) Net assets 358 ($5.3M)2022 Revenue 330 ($12M) Expenses 280 ($7.7M) Net assets 597 ($8.9M)2023 Revenue 520 ($19M) Expenses 455 ($13M) Net assets 997 ($15M)2024 Revenue 494 ($18M) Expenses 602 ($17M) Net assets 1068 ($16M)2025 Revenue 602 ($22M) Expenses 758 ($21M) Net assets 1101 ($16M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (602)Expenses (758)Net assets (1101)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $9.6M to $17M (+73%).

$1.5M
$2.9M
$3.3M
$4.6M
$5.6M
$9.6M
$17M
$19M
$21M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 5% · 2022 3% · 2023 1% · 2024 12% · 2025 16%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

96% of VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (96% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 391 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$803k
’17
$1.3M
’18
$493k
’19
$1.1M
’20
$970k
’21
$4.1M
’22
$6.0M
’23
$951k
’24
$533k
’25
2.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Dianne Calvi

CEO

Board chair

Katie Boland

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed161716181822262523
Joined·+2+0+3+0+4+11+7+2
No longer listed·11100784
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 23 funders to 41 funders, grant income rose $1.5M → $13M.

24 of 91 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 59% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $2.3M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Village Enterprise Capital Connector Corporation). These are real filings, and they are not money VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND raised.

From the IRS filings of VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 91 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 26% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

62% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND.

26%
largest funder
47%
top three
~9
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 35% · 2018 17% · 2019 23% · 2020 19% · 2021 27% · 2022 42% · 2023 54% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

62% of VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 68% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

60% of VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $20M that is directly attributable, 73% of it comes from funders outside California, across 20 states.

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
NE
DE
NC
OK
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $29M arriving through sponsors registered in 16 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND has grown faster than three-quarters of the 190 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin2% · above the median
Months of reserve2.9mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)25% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 190 international nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $5.5M on record.

Federal$5.5M
grants $5.5Mcontracts $0
23
24
Top agencies
  • Agency for International Development$5.5M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 11%Fundraising 8%

Governance

15
board members
93%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

86%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Village Enterprise Capital Connector Corporation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND?
VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND (California) receives grants from 91 organizations whose IRS filings report $48,954,326 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($12,645,418). 62 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 59% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND have?
IRS filings report 91 organizations giving $48,954,326 in grants to VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND, 62 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $12,645,418 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 91 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing