· Community foundation
Marin Community Foundation
Mobilizing the power of community and the resources of philanthropy to advance equity for people, places and the planet.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1,573 grants below total $186,064,091 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $238,833,857 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $52,769,766 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k159 grants · $1.1M
- $10k–50k815 grants · $16M
- $50k–250k452 grants · $46M
- $250k+147 grants · $123M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAGMAR DOLBY FUND | $10,000,000 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY INC | $4,437,166 |
| 10000 DEGREES | $4,403,422 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION | $3,393,185 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERS | $3,352,200 |
| THE WEST MARIN FUND | $3,348,254 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY | $3,110,500 |
| EQUATION CAMPAIGN AND GLOBAL CLIMATE LEGAL DEFENSE | $2,780,085 |
| AMERICAN PRAIRIE | $2,730,000 |
| FINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO | $2,682,700 |
| POINT REYES NATIONAL SEASHORE ASSOCIATION | $2,535,647 |
| THE CONSERVATION FUND | $2,072,000 |
| SAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE | $2,068,500 |
| THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES | $2,047,500 |
| ENRICHING LIVES THROUGH MUSIC | $1,999,150 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $31.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $54M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: PROVIDE GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT · SUPPORT PUNTA DE LOBOS PARK PROGRAMS · PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR THE DEFENSE OF THE SEA IN THE MAGALLANES REGION
Stated purpose: PROVIDE GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT · PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR PROJECTS IN ITALY · SUPPORT FOR THE SOLAR GEOENGINEERING NON-USE AGREEMENT INITIATIVE
Stated purpose: PROVIDE GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT · SUPPORT THE ESCUELA DE AGRICULTURA ECOLGICA U YITS KA'AN · SUPPORT THE LIVING DYING PROJECT
Stated purpose: PROVIDE SUPPORT FOR THE PROTECT OUR OCEANS CAMPAIGN TO INCREASE SANCTUARY AND MARINE PARK PROTECTION IN AUSTRALIA'S WATERS · PROVIDE GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT · SUPPORT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF AN INDO-PACIFIC BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN PROTECTED AREA IN JEJU, SOUTH KOREA
Stated purpose: SUPPORT RESEARCH STUDY ASSESSING THE LEVEL AND QUALITY OF EVALUATION DATA USAGE ON POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAMMES
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
1542 repeat relationships — 1046 still active in FY2025, 496 since wound down; 148 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WINCHESTER COLLEGE INC3× · 2018–2024 · $24M · revenue ×31 · 65% of their budget
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +189%
- 1D10000 DEGREES9× · 2017–2025 · $21M · revenue +175%
Funded once
- F5FIRST 5 SANTA CLARAone grant, 2024 · $2.5M
- TSTOWN SCHOOL FOR BOYSgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1.4M · revenue +70%
- TCTougaloo Collegeone grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.
California forward (ca fwd) brings people together across regions to improve government and create resilient growth statewide.
The California Water Data Consortium is an independent, nonprofit organization created by a partnership of state agencies and others to ensure that Californians have access to the best possible water and ecological information to make…
California Coastkeeper Alliance coordinates, supports & enhances the work of the local California Waterkeeper programs to provide a statewide voice for safeguarding California's waters, and its world renowned coast & ocean, for the benefit…
California changelawyers is a statewide foundation whose mission is to build a better justice system for all californians. changelawyers empowers the next generation of lawyers, judges, and activists to create a more diverse legal…
California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy is a nonpartisan policy and research organization focused on identifying solutions to the states most critical challenges at the intersection of higher education, equity, and the…
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory uses science to conserve birds and habitats. Our avian monitoring and habitat restoration activities provide critical data that we use to educate land managers and the public, and contribute to…
The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.
Support the launch of excellent new schools and innovative practices that improve education.
The Sierra Fund mission is to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada. We rely on the principles of science, stewardship, environmental justice, and policy advocacy to promote headwater resiliency for the…
Transform works to ensure that people of all incomes thrive in a world safe from climate chaos.
We work collaboratively to build open tools and resources for the evaluation and deployment of robust climate programs. We share analyses through public communication and collaboration with journalists in order to foster effective climate…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accountableus and the most unlike its peers is 42ND Street Moon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1859 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1859 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DAYTON FOUNDATION PLUS INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WINCHESTER COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds DAGMAR DOLBY FUND ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WEST MARIN FUND ↗
- Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA JAZZ CONSERVATORY INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Enriching Lives Through Music ↗
- Who funds MAKING WAVES ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE J DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Haight Street Art Center ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds Homeward Bound of Marin ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds DRAPER RICHARDS KAPLAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MARIN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds THE KING'S TRUST USA INC ↗
- Who funds JAPANESE CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Bothin Foundation · Peter E Haas Jr Family Fund · McNabb Foundation · The Stanley S Langendorf Foundation · Sonoma County Community Foundation · The William G Irwin Charity Foundation · Hobsonlucas Family Foundation · Tipping Point Community · The Springcreek Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marin Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.