Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE

LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE (California) receives grants from 139 organizations whose IRS filings report $9,133,781 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,851,673). 86 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 60% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$5.9M
Funders on record
139
Grants received
$9.1M
Net assets
$13M
86/139 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 36%
01What it does

What League to Save Lake Tahoe does

Mission

Mission statement: the League to Save Lake Tahoe protects and restores the environmental health, sustainability, and scenic beauty of the lake tahoe basin. We focus on water quality and its clarity for the preservation of a pristine lake for future generations.vision statement: we are the lake's strongest environmental watchdog. We proactively identify problems and find solutions. We use science and innovation to take rapid action.our holistic approach - how we work:- we advocate for environmental policies and funding to ensure tahoe is resilient in the face of the climate crisis.- we engage our community of residents and visitors to take actions that keep tahoe blue.- we create real-world, holistic solutions that will protect the lake for generations to come.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The league protects and preserves tahoe through our programs, initiatives, and advocacy. We tackle invasive species, combat pollution, and advance restoration to keep tahoe blue. Combat pollution-litter initiatives:2024 marked the eleventh year for the keep tahoe blue cleanup program with cataloged data. With this data, our staff created a trash dashboard, displayed on our stopping litter at its source webpage to visually display the data collected over the years. The league hosted 29 league cleanup events this year, with over 1,400 volunteers removing over 4,000 lbs. Of litter. Bebot:in 2024, the bebot (robot beach combing machines) fleet performed 21 cleanings across 11 beaches, cleaning over 1m square feet of beach area. Plastic litter was the most prevalent form of subsurface litter along tahoe's beaches this year, which has been consistent throughout bebot operations. At&t lead cable removal:the league worked directly with att, their contractor, and with all local permitting agencies to remove miles of abandoned lead telecommunications cables from lake tahoe in 2024. The remaining lead cable above water level will be removed in 2025.south lake tahoe plastic water bottle…

    $2,738,380 spentof which $15,500 as grants
    100% of program spending
  2. Tackling invasive species-tahoe keys controlled methods test:the controlled methods test (cmt) was a priority focus for the league in 2024 for non-herbicide methods and the conclusion of the three-year test. Laminar flow aeration, uv-c light, and diver-assisted suction hand removal methods were deployed in the tahoe keys to tackle the invasive species threat. The results of the full three years of the cmt will be published in 2025.lake tahoe aquatic invasive species (ais) containment:in 2024, the league worked with the tahoe keys property owners association to measure the efficacy of containment with bubble curtain technology. The pilot ais technology, collecthor and pixie drone were also deployed in the tahoe keys to help remove fragments of invasive weeds. Cd3 machine:in 2023, the league introduced a mobile, solar-powered cleaning station intended to stop the spread of invasive species from non-motorized watercraft before entering lake tahoe. In 2024, the program was expanded with additional machines to meeks bay with the washoe tribe.eyes on the lake:eyes on the lake is the league's citizen science program to help prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species (ais), which pose…

  3. Advancing restoration-motel 6 acquisition:in 2024, the california tahoe conservancy's acquisition of the motel 6 property and surrounding 31 acres within the upper truckee river watershed in south lake tahoe came together with league support, through comments, lobbying, and funding. The league is working with agency and nonprofit partners to create a plan for the restoration of this marsh as one of the lake's largest natural pollution filters. Once the buildings are removed and the habitat is restored, the property will reconnect more than 750 acres of marsh and meadow habitat, prevent sediment and polluted runoff from reaching the lake, and help keep tahoe blue.lake tahoe restoration act:league staff and board lobbied in washington, dc for both the reauthorization of the lake tahoe restoration act (ltra) funding and the appropriation of funding through the ltra. Tahoe fared well in 2024 with federal appropriations. Overall, the funding level in the house report is $36.9m in total allocation (a 26% increase over fy24); however, the likely allocation is $29.025m. In september of 2024, the reauthorization passed in the senate, and the approval extends existing funding authorizations…

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,738,380.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.7M) Expenses 100 ($2.2M) Net assets 100 ($3.9M)2018 Revenue 78 ($2.1M) Expenses 91 ($2.0M) Net assets 100 ($3.9M)2019 Revenue 99 ($2.6M) Expenses 91 ($2.0M) Net assets 122 ($4.7M)2020 Revenue 212 ($5.7M) Expenses 103 ($2.3M) Net assets 213 ($8.3M)2021 Revenue 155 ($4.2M) Expenses 121 ($2.6M) Net assets 256 ($9.9M)2022 Revenue 157 ($4.2M) Expenses 149 ($3.3M) Net assets 269 ($10M)2023 Revenue 166 ($4.4M) Expenses 163 ($3.6M) Net assets 296 ($11M)2024 Revenue 222 ($5.9M) Expenses 187 ($4.1M) Net assets 348 ($13M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (222)Expenses (187)Net assets (348)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $4.8M to $8.6M (+79%).

$4.0M
$4.0M
$4.8M
$8.6M
$10M
$11M
$12M
$14M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 10% · 2024 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

89% of LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (90% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,744 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$482k
’17
$78k
’18
$655k
’19
$3.4M
’20
$1.5M
’21
$943k
’22
$858k
’23
$1.8M
’24
1.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Darcie Goodman Collins

CEO

Board chair

Steven M Spurlock

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1922222522212426
Joined·+6+2+3+3+3+9+3
No longer listed·3206461
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 41 funders to 67 funders, grant income rose $293k → $1.4M.

24 of 139 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 60% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 139 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 7 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 7 funders to its left

66% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE.

20%
largest funder
37%
top three
~15
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 17% · 2018 13% · 2019 24% · 2020 14% · 2021 14% · 2022 10% · 2023 13% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 62% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

60% of LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $3.7M that is directly attributable, 53% of it comes from California funders.

ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
DE
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5.5M arriving through sponsors registered in 14 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,399 religion nonprofits its size.

Operating margin31% · top quartile
Months of reserve1.4mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,399 religion nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $190k on record.

Federal$190k
grants $190kcontracts $0
21
23
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$190k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

67% of spending goes to programs.

Program 67%Management 12%Fundraising 21%

Governance

22
board members
95%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE?
LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE (California) receives grants from 139 organizations whose IRS filings report $9,133,781 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,851,673). 86 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 60% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE have?
IRS filings report 139 organizations giving $9,133,781 in grants to LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE, 86 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $1,851,673 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds League to Save Lake Tahoe →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 139 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing