Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration

Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration (California) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,057,770 to it, the largest being CS FUND ($1,591,500). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.8M
Funders on record
16
Grants received
$5.1M
Net assets
$36k
10/16 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration does

Mission

The mission of Friends of ETC Group is to protect biodiversity and to advance the creation of a just and sustainable food security and sustainable livelihood system for the benefit of rural areas and societies.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. The Organization works toward its goals of promoting biodiversity and advancing just and sustainable food security and livelihood systems for the benefit of rural areas and societies largely through educational activities and by supporting the work of the Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC Group), a not-for-profit organization headquartered in Canada, and by supporting the work of other organizations aligned with its educational aims.During the fiscal year 2024/2025 the Organization supported increased in-person engagement with its partners and increased participation in international fora, with the aim to advance organizing, education and advocacy on critical issues related to food systems, climate change, biodiversity and sustainable livelihoods and technological change. The Organization engaged in multiple UN spaces, including the 30th conference of parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity where, along with partners, it maintained a moratorium on real world experiments in geoengineering. Building on this momentum, it organized to win a major victory at the 20th Ordinary Session of the African Ministerial Conference on the Environment (AMCEN),…

    $1,811,500 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,811,500.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($730k) Expenses 100 ($647k) Net assets 100 ($320k)2018 Revenue 39 ($284k) Expenses 53 ($343k) Net assets 82 ($261k)2019 Revenue 121 ($881k) Expenses 153 ($988k) Net assets 48 ($154k)2020 Revenue 72 ($528k) Expenses 104 ($674k) Net assets 3 ($8k)2021 Revenue 88 ($644k) Expenses 99 ($638k) Net assets 4 ($14k)2022 Revenue 59 ($434k) Expenses 67 ($436k) Net assets 4 ($11k)2023 Revenue 110 ($801k) Expenses 121 ($784k) Net assets 9 ($28k)2024 Revenue 125 ($912k) Expenses 142 ($920k) Net assets 6 ($20k)2025 Revenue 251 ($1.8M) Expenses 281 ($1.8M) Net assets 11 ($36k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (251)Expenses (281)Net assets (11)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $154k to $8k (−95%).

$320k
$261k
$154k
$8k
$14k
$11k
$29k
$20k
$36k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,195 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$83k
’17
−$59k
’18
−$107k
’19
−$145k
’20
$6k
’21
−$2k
’22
$17k
’23
−$9k
’24
$16k
’25
0.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed666666666
Joined·+0+1+0+0+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·01000000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 7 funders, grant income rose $260k → $953k.

6 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 23% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration leans on a few funders — its largest provides 31% of grant income and the top three 66%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

31%
largest funder
66%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 67% · 2018 59% · 2019 43% · 2020 47% · 2021 51% · 2022 33% · 2023 40% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

63% of Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

87% of Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration's grant income comes from California funders.

NY
MA
NJ
CA
NM
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.2M arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration's funding base is broadening — from 3 funders to 7 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin1% · below the median
Months of reserve0.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 605 food & nutrition nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

41%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration?
Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration (California) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,057,770 to it, the largest being CS FUND ($1,591,500). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration have?
IRS filings report 16 organizations giving $5,057,770 in grants to Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration?
CS FUND is the largest funder on record, with $1,591,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Friends of Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 16 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing