Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION

VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION (California) receives grants from 41 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,415,566 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($481,725). 25 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 69% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$1.6M
Funders on record
41
Grants received
$2.4M
Net assets
$1.9M
25/41 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 29%
01What it does

What Valley of the Moon Natural History Association does

Mission

We preserve the historic and natural beauty of the park while creating innovative opportunities for recreation, education and enjoyment. We collaborate with our community and volunteers to ensure a sustainable park that would make jack london proud.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Valley of the Moon Natural History Association (vmnha) was established in 1977 to support the interpretive needs of three sonoma county parks: annadel state park, jack london state historic park (jlshp) and sugarloaf ridge state historic park. Vmnha has played a key role in providing monetary support for training, coordination and recognition of volunteers who carry out the essential functions of these parks. Vmnha has also overseen the development of cultural and recreational programs, educational exhibits, signage and historical displays at jlshp. Among the organization's accomplishments is the award winning restoration of the cottage that jack london lived in after acquiring beauty ranch. In may 2012, vmnha became the first non-profit to enter into an operating agreement with the state of california to prevent jlshp from closure. Vmnha dba jack london park partners (jlpp) oversees management of the park. Currently over 250 volunteers, and a staff of 12 carry out essential operations and maintenance responsibilities at jlshp. Jlpp receives no funds from state parks to subsidize the management and operation of the park and depends entirely on private donations to execute…

    $1,095,145 spent$300,420 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,095,145.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($809k) Expenses 100 ($801k) Net assets 100 ($1.0M)2018 Revenue 178 ($1.4M) Expenses 90 ($718k) Net assets 127 ($1.3M)2019 Revenue 116 ($939k) Expenses 97 ($779k) Net assets 144 ($1.5M)2020 Revenue 124 ($1.0M) Expenses 96 ($771k) Net assets 159 ($1.6M)2021 Revenue 159 ($1.3M) Expenses 114 ($912k) Net assets 192 ($2.0M)2022 Revenue 118 ($956k) Expenses 140 ($1.1M) Net assets 174 ($1.8M)2023 Revenue 175 ($1.4M) Expenses 174 ($1.4M) Net assets 193 ($2.0M)2024 Revenue 203 ($1.6M) Expenses 196 ($1.6M) Net assets 185 ($1.9M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (203)Expenses (196)Net assets (185)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $1.7M to $2.0M (+17%).

$1.1M
$1.3M
$1.5M
$1.7M
$2.0M
$1.8M
$2.0M
$2.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 2% · 2019 1% · 2020 10% · 2021 8% · 2023 4% · 2024 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

92% of VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$8k
’17
$721k
’18
$160k
’19
$231k
’20
$376k
’21
−$166k
’22
$22k
’23
$76k
’24
6.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Mike Benziger

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1513182019182121
Joined·+0+5+2+3+6+3+4
No longer listed·2004704
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 9 funders to 17 funders, grant income rose $88k → $398k.

15 of 41 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 69% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 41 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

71% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION.

20%
largest funder
47%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 35% · 2018 40% · 2019 39% · 2020 35% · 2021 38% · 2022 44% · 2023 20% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

48% of VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 61% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

69% of VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $739k that is directly attributable, 91% of it comes from California funders.

MT
IN
CA
DE
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.7M arriving through sponsors registered in 12 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION is better cushioned than half of the 2,186 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin5% · below the median
Months of reserve6.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)11% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,186 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

70% of spending goes to programs.

Program 70%Management 15%Fundraising 16%

Governance

19
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION?
VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION (California) receives grants from 41 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,415,566 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($481,725). 25 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 69% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION have?
IRS filings report 41 organizations giving $2,415,566 in grants to VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION, 25 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION?
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $481,725 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like VALLEY OF THE MOON NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Valley of the Moon Natural History Association →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 41 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing