Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

Outdoor Alliance

Outdoor Alliance (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 34 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,147,289 to it, the largest being WILBURFORCE FOUNDATION ($697,500). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.7M
Funders on record
34
Grants received
$4.1M
Net assets
$1.3M
21/34 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 61%
01What it does

What Outdoor Alliance does

Mission

Our mission is to unite the voices of outdoor enthusiasts to protect the humanpowered outdoor recreation experience and conserve Americas public lands.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Conservation Policy: Research, analysis, and evaluation of state and federal public land policy (including federal agency regulations and legislation) as it relates to conserving and protecting the outdoors and providing clean air and water, healthy ecosystems, and opportunities for sustainable human powered outdoor recreation. Develop community-wide conservation access policy priorities, including various protective land and water designations, and educate state and federal policymakers regarding the same. Provide training for local Grasstops leaders in areas of civic engagement, government processes, and community leadership. Collaborate with various conservation stakeholders, including the sportsmen community, traditional environmental community, and the outdoor business community.

    $891,459 spentof which $90,000 as grants
    54% of program spending
  2. Data and Communications: Educate organizations and people within the human powered outdoor recreation community regarding conservation policy and related civic engagement opportunities. Develop internal organizational capacity regarding policy analysis, communications, and community organizing. Develop and provide professional support for state-level networks to enable local human powered organizations and local leaders to identify and pursue local conservation and sustainable recreational access priorities.

    $665,021 spent
    40% of program spending
  3. Geographic Information System Laboratory: The GIS Lab enables community and policy makers to better evaluate, understand and visualize complex geospatial relationships that will result in better policy outcomes for public lands.

    $76,702 spent
    5% of program spending
  4. Lobbying: We work to ensure the best protections for places that matter to the outdoor recreation community. Our campaigns advocate for stronger legislative protection for landscapes that support sustainable public access to the outdoors, including places that provide climbing, paddling, mountain biking, hiking, surfing, backcountry skiing, and mountaineering opportunities.

    $9,067 spent
    1% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,642,249.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($910k) Expenses 100 ($683k) Net assets 100 ($499k)2018 Revenue 96 ($871k) Expenses 115 ($787k) Net assets 117 ($584k)2019 Revenue 97 ($884k) Expenses 126 ($861k) Net assets 122 ($607k)2020 Revenue 145 ($1.3M) Expenses 131 ($895k) Net assets 205 ($1.0M)2021 Revenue 138 ($1.3M) Expenses 139 ($951k) Net assets 266 ($1.3M)2022 Revenue 146 ($1.3M) Expenses 172 ($1.2M) Net assets 298 ($1.5M)2023 Revenue 151 ($1.4M) Expenses 189 ($1.3M) Net assets 313 ($1.6M)2024 Revenue 165 ($1.5M) Expenses 248 ($1.7M) Net assets 273 ($1.4M)2025 Revenue 192 ($1.7M) Expenses 268 ($1.8M) Net assets 257 ($1.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (192)Expenses (268)Net assets (257)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $623k to $1.0M (+66%).

$511k
$594k
$623k
$1.0M
$1.3M
$1.5M
$1.6M
$1.4M
$1.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 6% · 2021 7%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

98% of Outdoor Alliance’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$227k
’17
$84k
’18
$23k
’19
$424k
’20
$303k
’21
$159k
’22
$78k
’23
−$198k
’24
−$85k
’25
5.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Adam Cramer

Chief Executive Officer

Board chair

Katherine Tsai

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed131313131312171518
Joined·+2+6+0+0+4+6+1+3
No longer listed·26005130
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 15 funders, grant income rose $169k → $833k.

10 of 34 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 21% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Outdoor Alliance’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 34 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Outdoor Alliance has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 17% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

17%
largest funder
48%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 74% · 2018 53% · 2019 47% · 2020 17% · 2021 27% · 2022 25% · 2023 24% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of Outdoor Alliance's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 62% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

Outdoor Alliance draws 95% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 13 states in all.

WA
MN
MA
WY
PA
CA
CO
WV
DE
AR
DC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $867k arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Outdoor Alliance is better cushioned than half of the 1,074 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−5% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.1mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like Outdoor Alliance

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 6%Fundraising 4%

Governance

15
board members
93%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

62%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Outdoor Alliance: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Outdoor Alliance?
Outdoor Alliance (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 34 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,147,289 to it, the largest being WILBURFORCE FOUNDATION ($697,500). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Outdoor Alliance have?
IRS filings report 34 organizations giving $4,147,289 in grants to Outdoor Alliance, 21 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Outdoor Alliance?
WILBURFORCE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $697,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Outdoor Alliance find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 34 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing