Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

COMMONWEAL

COMMONWEAL (California) receives grants from 136 organizations whose IRS filings report $19,947,035 to it, the largest being THE JENIFER ALTMAN FOUNDATION ($2,259,118). 76 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$11M
Funders on record
136
Grants received
$20M
Net assets
$12M
76/136 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 46%
01What it does

What Commonweal does

Mission

Engage in educational, charitable and research activities which contribute to the health of individuals, to public health and to the health of the global environment.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2024 return the organization reported starting a significant new program.

The Youth, Education & Arts (YEA!) Initiative at Commonweal brings together three long-standing, research-based arts education programsVisual Thinking Strategies (VTS), Partners for Youth Empowerment (PYE), and Collaborations: Teachers and Artists (CoTA)under one collaborative framework. Each program retains its distinct mission while benefiting from shared infrastructure, fundraising, and strategy. YEA! is led by a Senior Director who coordinates program growth, development, and financial sustainability through joint fundraising, business development, and cross-program collaboration. The initiatives purpose is to stabilize and strengthen these programs, increase earned and philanthropic revenue, and extend their collective impact in schools, museums, and community settings across the U.S. and internationally.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 2).

  1. RESILIENCE:Commonweals Resilience program is an umbrella that includes both The Resilience Project and Omega. The Resilience Project (TRP) builds on four decades of work at Commonweal on healing ourselves and healing the earth. TRP focuses on the polycrisismore than two dozen environmental and social stressors that have created a perfect storm of human and biosphere threats. TRP goals: Empower people, projects & practices to meet the Global Challenge; welcome diverse views across the global spectrum; encourage respectful dialogues across regions & cultures; inspire creative responses to the polycrisis. Stanley Wu serves as director. Omega incubates new initiatives for living in and through the global polycrisis. Omegas goal is to help build the nascent field of polycrisis research and action. This includes: (1) to map the best thinking on the polycrisis, (2) to identify the global network of those working toward creative solutions, (3) to identify the community of those who can work together to strengthen resilience, and (4) to identify and support specific projects with special value added. Omegas initiatives include: The Omega Collaborative, a steadily growing working group of…

    $915,347 spentof which $41,000 as grants
    10% of program spending
  2. Center for Healing and Liberation:Launched in 2021, the Center for Healing and Liberation is a home for transformative work. Within a community of belonging, the Center cultivates our individual and collective liberation through a range of initiatives, events, practices, actions and community networks. We are all related, and our futures are connected. To dismantle oppressive systems and transform culture, we need analysis and strategy, love and resilience, tools and skills, healing community, and a clear vision of a sustainable human story. The Center offers refuge, resources, and nourishment for change makers. The Centers initiatives serve those who are dedicated to taking action for racial, gender, environmental, and economic justice. The Center has a strong focus on supporting Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC). This includes programs built around healing practices and explorations that offer clarity, discovery, release and deep rest. Sometimes it is helpful to cultivate healing within similar-identity cohorts while at the same time holding the collective. Victoria Santos serves as the director. (centerforhealingandliberation.com)

    $910,108 spentof which $5,000 as grants$10,000 earned by the program
    10% of program spending
  3. CENTER FOR ETHICAL LAND TRANSITION:Center for Ethical Land Transition supports the land justice movement with education, training, and alternative land transitions rooted in BIPOC solidarity, land-centric orientation, and innovation.

    $852,594 spentof which $1,000 as grants$12,366 earned by the program
    10% of program spending
  4. Somos El Poder:Somos El Poder (SEP) is dedicated to improving and growing fundraising at Latinx focused nonprofits in our nation. SEP works with any Latinx focused nonprofit regardless of size or budget providing support, professional development, best practices, training, and more. Armando Zumaya serves as director. (somoselpoder.org)

    $797,299 spent$97,345 earned by the program
    9% of program spending
  5. HEALING CIRCLES:Founded in 2014, Healing Circles is an international learning community for people who want to do deep intentional healing work with cancer and other diseases or experiences of loss. Designed to extend the core work of the Cancer Help Program, it seeks to bring the deep experiences of healing to people who want to create a healing circle in their living room, church or any other setting. Healing Circles was founded in partnership with three other centersin Vancouver, B.C., Washington State, and Smith Center for Healing and the Arts in Washington, D.C.that have done residential retreats based on the Cancer Help Program model for at least 20 years. We now have new centers in Langley on Whidbey Island, Washington, and in Houston, Texas. Our three Bay Area CCHP alumni groups are our laboratories for Healing Circles work in the Bay Area. Healing Circles are forming in North Carolina, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. Another Healing Circle just began in Jerusalem. Hundreds of people have experienced and studied Healing Circles work. Oren Slozberg serves as the director for Healing Circles.

    $680,053 spent$167,294 earned by the program
    8% of program spending
  6. Humane Prison Hospice Project:Humane Prison Hospice Project (Humane) is developing a humanitarian, cost-effective and restorative justice solution to ensure that those aging and dying in prison receive compassionate care. The Humane team believes that the right to receive compassionate end-of-life care is a basic human rightone that should be extended to everyone, even some of the most wounded and troubled in our society. Humane strives for a world where all incarcerated people are treated with dignity and respect. Their model benefits not only the dying, but their fellow prisoners who provide the care, and the prison correctional staff as well, as they witness how transformative it can be for prisoners to learn to care for their dying brothers. The curriculum theyve developed trains prisoners as hospice volunteers in end-of-life care and grief support, and in other modes of crisis intervention that prepares them to support their peers who are suffering from depression, suicidal ideation, or the effects of trauma and violence often experienced behind bars. The outcome is a therapeutic community within prison walls that results in a cultural shift toward compassion, care, empathy…

    $650,374 spent
    7% of program spending
  7. YEA!:The Youth, Education & Arts (YEA!) Initiative at Commonweal brings together three long-standing, research-based arts education programsVisual Thinking Strategies (VTS), Partners for Youth Empowerment (PYE), and Collaborations: Teachers and Artists (CoTA)under one collaborative framework. Each program retains its distinct mission while benefiting from shared infrastructure, fundraising, and strategy. YEA! is led by a Senior Director who coordinates program growth, development, and financial sustainability through joint fundraising, business development, and cross-program collaboration. The initiatives purpose is to stabilize and strengthen these programs, increase earned and philanthropic revenue, and extend their collective impact in schools, museums, and community settings across the U.S. and internationally.

    $594,852 spentof which $28,161 as grants$170,281 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  8. Collaborative on Health and the Environment: Founded in 2002, the Collaborative on Health and the Environment (CHE) cultivates a learning community based on the latest, evidence-based science to share knowledge and resources, to improve individual and collective health. CHE is focused on how environmental risks can impact human health. By informing and connecting affected and interested groups, CHE hopes to build a groundswell of demand for prevention-focused behaviors and policies, as well as economic and legal structures that protect public health. CHEs primary activities include: sharing emerging scientific research on environmental determinants of health; fostering interdisciplinary and inclusive collaboration among diverse constituencies to translate and communicate the best available environmental health science; and facilitating efforts to reduce disease and disability and improve health across the lifespan. Kristin Schafer serves as the director of CHE.

    $543,205 spent$30,645 earned by the program
    6% of program spending
  9. CancerChoices:CancerChoices is a platform that supports patients, caregivers and health professionals who seek balanced, science backed information on integrative cancer care to improve cancer outcomes. The mission of CancerChoices is to reduce suffering and support healing and resilience among people with cancer. CancerChoices is working to expand interest in and access to quality cancer care that integrates conventional care, self care, and complementary care. CancerChoices is contributing to raising the status and legitimacy of integrative cancer care among medical professionals and people affected by cancer. The CancerChoices website creates a healing space for people to come together to learn about hope, community, healing, and new priorities in life within the context of cancer. You can find out about the landscape of cancer care and the wide variety of options that can be integrated to promote healing. CancerChoices evaluates and summarizes evidence to help people assess their cancer care options to skillfully integrate self care and complementary care with conventional cancer care. Michael Lerner serves as the director. (cancerchoices.org)

    $464,528 spent
    5% of program spending
  10. Commonweal Cancer Help Program:Founded in 1985, the Commonweal Cancer Help Program (CCHP) is perhaps the most respected residential support program for people with cancer and their significant others in the United States. Bill Moyers featured CCHP in his award-winning PBS series, Healing and the Mind. CCHP provides a weeklong program of yoga; meditation; relaxation; breathing practices; massage; morning support groups; sand-tray; exploration of sacred space; healing arts; music; an evening of healing words; primarily vegetarian whole foods cooking; individual sessions with co-leaders, nutritionists, and yoga practitioners; support groups; and explorations of choices in healing, conventional and complementary therapies, pain and suffering, and death and dying. CCHP regularly and reliably transforms the lives of participants in lasting and profound ways; it changes the experience of livingand sometimes dyingwith cancer. We currently offer six CCHP retreats each year. Since 2012, we also have been holding three-day Cancer Help Program trainings for Bay Area Young Survivors (BAYS)- a community of young adults who have metastatic breast cancer. Arlene Allsman serves as the coordinator…

    $421,087 spent$75,316 earned by the program
    5% of program spending
  11. Center for Creative Community: Founded in 2014, the Center for Creative Community (C3) is an umbrella for a number of Commonweal projects that explore the intersection of dialogue, cognition, creativity, and community. Through work in different communities, C3 seeks to deepen our exploration of complex issues in our world. C3 programs include the Power of Hope Youth Camp, the Creative Facilitation Training Series, Commonweals Fall Gathering, Taproot, and Visual Thinking Strategies program. These programs are bringing new energy and diversity to Commonweal, strengthening the foundation for the next forty years of work. Oren Slozberg directs C3.

    $309,200 spent$55,447 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  12. Commonweal Retreat Center: The Commonweal Retreat Center is a breathtakingly beautiful space within the Commonweal site, where we hold the Cancer Help Program retreats and other Commonweal workshops. It also hosts personal and professional conferences, workshops, retreats, and gatherings that are compatible with Commonweal's nonprofit status. The Retreat Center includes Pacific House, a 12-bedroom retreat facility with a commercial kitchen, and Bothin and Kohler Houses, with two and three bedrooms respectively. Jenepher Stowell directs the Retreat Center.

    $300,950 spent$191,195 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  13. Natura Institute for Ecology and Medicine at Commonweal Garden:Natura Institute for Ecology and Medicinethe new program stewarding the Commonweal Gardenis dedicated to reconnecting people to the living systems that restore us to health and wholeness. Founded and directed by Anna OMalley, an Integrative Family and Community Medicine physician, Natura Institute is embodying a new model of care that does not deplete the precious resource that is the healer, that empowers the precious being that is seeking well-being, and that does no harm on an interpersonal, ecological, and planetary level. The Natura Institute seeks to reconnect people with healing, through deepening relationship with nature, healing plants (food and medicinal), and that which heals our human nature. The Natura Institute embodies an alternative model of proactive wellbeing-oriented medicine that is community-based and nature-placed, and serves the community at large as well as the medical community.

    $282,100 spentof which $310 as grants$12,465 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  14. Health Environment Action Research Team:The Health and Environment Action Research Team (HEART) is a collaborative that brings together environmental health scientists, analysts, and activists who lead environmental health projects at Commonweal. Steve Heilig (San Francisco Medical Society, CHE and TNS), Sharyle Patton (Biomonitoring Resource Center), Ted Schettler (Ecology of Health Initiative), Maria Valenti (Health and Environment Literacy Project), Kristin Schafer (CHE) and Michael Lerner, along with Oren Slozberg, ex officio, represent the team. We have monthly calls where we share strategies and explore collaboration. These are all deeply experienced scientists and advocates with remarkable networks. They demonstrate the quiet reach of Commonweals work in environmental health. HEART remains a low-key but useful gathering place.

    $201,880 spent
    2% of program spending
  15. INNOVATIVE LEARNING AND LIVING INSTITUTE:Innovative Learning and Living Institute is an immersive residency that supports young adults, their communities, and the lands they inhabit to create regenerative relationships.

    $195,367 spent
    2% of program spending
  16. Octavia Fund:The mission is to offer creative rest space for Black women activists to dream, cultivate their radical imagination, and plant the seeds of a more just world. We are building a community of Black women who are reclaiming rest as their birthright. Twice a year we offer retreat space for Black women activists to rest, dream, explore their creativity, and connect across movements, age, class, and identity. Retreat participation presently includes complimentary accommodations in beautiful natural settings, stipends for community care and transportation, optional programming rooted in embodiment and practicing our freedom.

    $176,301 spent
    2% of program spending
  17. GO Compassion:GO Compassion uses art as a portal for introducing mediation as a healing practice for individuals and groups. The focus of the GO Compassion collaborations is on underserved,under-resourced segments of societyfoster youth and young adults from the foster system, individuals charged with criminal offenses, individuals who are returning to communities after a period of incarceration, and immigrant youth. Every collaboration gives access to learning about and practicing methods that increase self-awareness and the experience of self-healing from trauma. Angela Oh and Tu Ying Ming co-direct GO Compassion.

    $164,850 spentof which $7,700 as grants
    2% of program spending
  18. The New School at Commonweal:Founded in 2007, The New School at Commonweal (TNS) is a community of inquiry exploring topics in health, the arts and sciences, the environment, and the inner life. TNS presents conversations, book readings, performances, and other events with thought and action leaders who are changing our world. Over 200 events are recorded and offered as podcasts on iTunes and our website. Most gatherings are offered free of charge as gifts to the Commonweal community, giving forward into a circle of generosity. In addition, TNS continues to refine an online presence, including maintaining the website and sending monthly newsletters that are eliciting good response and discussion. Michael Lerner serves as the director, and Kyra Epstein serves as the coordinator of TNS.

    $139,741 spent
    2% of program spending
  19. Retreat Center Collaborative:The Retreat Center Collaborative endeavors to support the movement for spiritual transformation by focusing on the infrastructure needed to nurture individual and collective change, creating a network of retreat centers, and working together on strategies for financial sustainability. Oren Slozberg and Jenepher Stowell are on the Steering Committee with Fetzer Institute and other partners for this project. Ben Scott-Brandt serves as director. (retreatcentercollaboration.org)

    $135,109 spent$8,150 earned by the program
    2% of program spending
  20. OTHER VARIOUS PROGRAMS:In the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, Commonweal's other programs did a variety of work contributing to health of people and of the planet. Programs included Commonweal Biomonitoring Resource Center, Commonweal Juvenile Justice Program, Foundation for Embodied Medicine, Racial Healing Initiative, Syntropy Healing & Research, West Marin Climate Action, West Marin Review, Project Soul, SafetyNEST Science, Kids & Caregivers, Integrative Law Institute, Center for Dying & Lving, THE NEW SCHOOLS, GREEN INITIATIVES, and Regenerative Design Institute.

    $112,773 spentof which $23,000 as grants$135,030 earned by the program
    1% of program spending
  21. RACIAL HEALING INITIATIVE:Racial Healing Initiative is a nationwide racial equity initiative grounded in retreat centers in the United States.

The 21 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $8,847,718.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.5M) Expenses 100 ($4.0M) Net assets 100 ($4.3M)2018 Revenue 152 ($5.2M) Expenses 111 ($4.5M) Net assets 119 ($5.2M)2019 Revenue 143 ($5.0M) Expenses 103 ($4.1M) Net assets 139 ($6.0M)2020 Revenue 153 ($5.3M) Expenses 99 ($4.0M) Net assets 170 ($7.4M)2021 Revenue 135 ($4.7M) Expenses 86 ($3.5M) Net assets 193 ($8.4M)2022 Revenue 292 ($10M) Expenses 142 ($5.7M) Net assets 280 ($12M)2023 Revenue 221 ($7.6M) Expenses 234 ($9.4M) Net assets 247 ($11M)2024 Revenue 303 ($10M) Expenses 254 ($10M) Net assets 263 ($11M)2025 Revenue 328 ($11M) Expenses 265 ($11M) Net assets 284 ($12M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (328)Expenses (265)Net assets (284)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $9.2M to $13M (+39%).

$4.9M
$5.6M
$6.4M
$8.1M
$9.2M
$13M
$12M
$13M
$13M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 9% · 2022 6% · 2023 6% · 2024 3% · 2025 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

89% of COMMONWEAL’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,400 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$572k
’17
$769k
’18
$828k
’19
$1.3M
’20
$1.2M
’21
$4.4M
’22
−$1.8M
’23
$254k
’24
$643k
’25
0.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Katherine Fulton

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed91010111010131315
Joined·+3+0+2+1+1+3+0+2
No longer listed·20121000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 22 funders to 49 funders, grant income rose $753k → $2.6M.

38 of 136 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 44% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $1.6M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest The Hale Fund). These are real filings, and they are not money COMMONWEAL raised.

From the IRS filings of COMMONWEAL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 136 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

COMMONWEAL has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 11% of grant income, and it takes 7 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 7 funders to its left

49% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund COMMONWEAL.

11%
largest funder
29%
top three
~20
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 33% · 2018 26% · 2019 36% · 2020 30% · 2021 23% · 2022 18% · 2023 14% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

41% of COMMONWEAL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

COMMONWEAL draws 58% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 23 states in all.

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
MD
DE
AZ
AR
NC
DC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $8.8M arriving through sponsors registered in 20 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

COMMONWEAL has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,297 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin6% · above the median
Months of reserve0.7mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)16% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,297 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding COMMONWEAL receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $84k on record.

Federal$84k
grants $0contracts $84k
22
23
Top agencies
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$84k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like COMMONWEAL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 12%Fundraising 6%

Governance

10
board members
80%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

84%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 21 states

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
HI
LA
TX

Part of a family of 3 related entities

  • The Hale Fund · exempt
  • Jenifer Altman Foundation · exempt
  • Climate Action Systems Inc · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for COMMONWEAL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds COMMONWEAL?
COMMONWEAL (California) receives grants from 136 organizations whose IRS filings report $19,947,035 to it, the largest being THE JENIFER ALTMAN FOUNDATION ($2,259,118). 76 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does COMMONWEAL have?
IRS filings report 136 organizations giving $19,947,035 in grants to COMMONWEAL, 76 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of COMMONWEAL?
THE JENIFER ALTMAN FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,259,118 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like COMMONWEAL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 136 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing