Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

WILDCARE

WILDCARE (California) receives grants from 115 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,086,985 to it, the largest being THE DAVID AND MARY-HOE LOVE FOUNDATION ($3,000,000). 68 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$14M
Funders on record
115
Grants received
$12M
Net assets
$27M
68/115 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 89%
01What it does

What Wildcare does

Mission

WildCare supports people everywhere to live well with wildlife, through a full cycle of programs including wildlife advocacy and information resources, nature education programs, and medical aid for wild animals in need. Each year we treat as many as 3,500 ill, injured and orphaned wild animals in our wildlife hospital, teach 13,000+ children and adults through our acclaimed environmental education programs, and advocate for wildlife at the local, state and national levels.Since our hospitals founding, we have treated and cared for more than 120,000 wild animal patients, and we have engaged more than 1,000,000 children and adults through environmental learning experiences and advocacy.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. ANIMAL CARE: Each year, WildCare delivers world-class medical care to as many as 3,500 ill, injured and orphaned wild animal patients in our open-admission wildlife hospital. Over the course of our history in wildlife medicine, we have given more than 120,000 wild animals a second chance at life in the wild.WildCares patients represent more than 200 different species, and over 90% of the wild animals we have helped have been injured or orphaned as a result of human interaction. Our goal is always to treat and heal our wild animal patients, and release them back to their wild lives.

    $1,870,119 spentof which $741 as grants
    63% of program spending
  2. WILDLIFE EDUCATION: WildCares Terwilliger Nature Education programs provide school and youth programs, as well as family nature outings, which connect over 16,000 children and adults to the Bay areas abundant open spaces and wildlife. Our programs aim to strengthen environmental stewardship and responsibility by teaching an appreciation of nature and a respect for wildlife. Our experiential and academically supportive approach to environmental education attracts participation from more than 130 schools and community organizations for the eight Bay Area counties. Through our scholarship program, WildCare is able to provide our programs to students from disadvantaged and low-income backgrounds, so these students no longer have to miss out on nature discovery opportunities that ignite a sense of excitement about science and foster personal connections to the natural world. Through free family nature outings, our robust scholarship and bilingual programming (Spanish/English) ensure that children and families from diverse backgrounds have equal access to environmental education. This is a non-cash scholarship program. The scholarship is a discount of WildCares normal educational…

    $1,116,963 spentof which $318 as grants$163,607 earned by the program
    37% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,987,082.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4.6M) Expenses 100 ($3.6M) Net assets 100 ($5.9M)2018 Revenue 62 ($2.9M) Expenses 106 ($3.8M) Net assets 25 ($1.5M)2019 Revenue 75 ($3.5M) Expenses 67 ($2.4M) Net assets 17 ($1.0M)2020 Revenue 60 ($2.8M) Expenses 69 ($2.5M) Net assets 23 ($1.3M)2021 Revenue 69 ($3.2M) Expenses 73 ($2.6M) Net assets 33 ($1.9M)2022 Revenue 89 ($4.1M) Expenses 91 ($3.3M) Net assets 47 ($2.8M)2023 Revenue 81 ($3.8M) Expenses 83 ($3.0M) Net assets 60 ($3.6M)2024 Revenue 101 ($4.7M) Expenses 93 ($3.4M) Net assets 292 ($17M)2025 Revenue 292 ($14M) Expenses 112 ($4.0M) Net assets 453 ($27M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (292)Expenses (112)Net assets (453)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $3.9M to $18M (+359%).

$6.1M
$1.8M
$1.4M
$2.0M
$2.5M
$3.1M
$3.9M
$18M
$28M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 10% · 2022 19%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.0M
’17
−$922k
’18
$1.0M
’19
$301k
’20
$588k
’21
$856k
’22
$758k
’23
$1.3M
’24
$9.5M
’25
53
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Ellyn Weisel

Exec. Director

Board chair

Robert Carlson

Audit chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed161313121413131315
Joined·+6+1+0+2+1+3+0+4
No longer listed·91102302
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 29 funders to 46 funders, grant income rose $479k → $1.4M.

20 of 115 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 46% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WILDCARE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 115 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WILDCARE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

53% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WILDCARE.

25%
largest funder
54%
top three
~9
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 42% · 2018 36% · 2019 54% · 2020 38% · 2021 25% · 2022 82% · 2023 40% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

43% of WILDCARE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 59% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

WILDCARE draws 55% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 21 states in all.

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
OH
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
DE
NC
HI
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5.6M arriving through sponsors registered in 14 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like WILDCARE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

74% of spending goes to programs.

Program 74%Management 9%Fundraising 17%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

80%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WILDCARE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WILDCARE?
WILDCARE (California) receives grants from 115 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,086,985 to it, the largest being THE DAVID AND MARY-HOE LOVE FOUNDATION ($3,000,000). 68 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WILDCARE have?
IRS filings report 115 organizations giving $12,086,985 in grants to WILDCARE, 68 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WILDCARE?
THE DAVID AND MARY-HOE LOVE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $3,000,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WILDCARE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 115 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing