Skip to content

New Hampshire · Nonprofit

SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY

SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY (New Hampshire) receives grants from 54 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,851,582 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($2,281,550). 41 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 63% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$1.1M
Funders on record
54
Grants received
$5.9M
Net assets
$20M
41/54 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 44%
01What it does

What Squam Lakes Conservation Society does

Mission

Override

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Education and community engagement slcs provides educational programs, events, volunteer opportunities, and community partnerships that connect people with the lands and waters of the squam lakes region and inspire informed, active stewardship.

    $119,687 spent
    24% of program spending
  2. Land conservation slcs acquires land and conservation easements to permanently protect the lands, waters, wildlife habitat, natural beauty, and community values of the squam lakes region for the benefit of current and future generations.

    $178,885 spent
    36% of program spending
  3. Stewardship slcs cares for conserved lands and upholds conservation easements through ongoing monitoring, landowner engagement, active land management, and response to encroachments or other violations, ensuring that conservation values are protected in perpetuity

    $197,906 spent
    40% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $496,478.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($1.2M) Expenses 100 ($452k) Net assets 100 ($12M)2020 Revenue 101 ($1.2M) Expenses 119 ($541k) Net assets 107 ($13M)2021 Revenue 323 ($3.8M) Expenses 137 ($621k) Net assets 134 ($16M)2022 Revenue 285 ($3.4M) Expenses 704 ($3.2M) Net assets 131 ($16M)2023 Revenue 269 ($3.2M) Expenses 128 ($578k) Net assets 157 ($19M)2024 Revenue 123 ($1.5M) Expenses 503 ($2.3M) Net assets 154 ($18M)2025 Revenue 98 ($1.1M) Expenses 162 ($735k) Net assets 165 ($20M)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (98)Expenses (162)Net assets (165)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $13M to $16M (+26%).

$12M
$13M
$16M
$16M
$19M
$19M
$20M
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

84% of SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,303 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$727k
’19
$653k
’20
$3.2M
’21
$172k
’22
$2.6M
’23
−$819k
’24
$415k
’25
4.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Lauren Kras

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

2019202020212022202320242025
Listed19192021192118
Joined·+1+3+1+4+5+3
No longer listed·120636
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 12 funders to 28 funders, grant income rose $131k → $800k.

15 of 54 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 63% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 54 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 39% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

63% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY.

39%
largest funder
53%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 31% · 2018 28% · 2019 53% · 2020 29% · 2021 30% · 2022 45% · 2023 49% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

61% of SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 76% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

63% of SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $2.2M that is directly attributable, 98% of it comes from funders outside New Hampshire, across 14 states.

NH
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DE
NC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New Hampshire out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.7M arriving through sponsors registered in 12 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,209 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin36% · top quartile
Months of reserve4.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,209 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New Hampshire

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

68% of spending goes to programs.

Program 68%Management 22%Fundraising 10%

Governance

17
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

64%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NH

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY?
SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY (New Hampshire) receives grants from 54 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,851,582 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($2,281,550). 41 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 63% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY have?
IRS filings report 54 organizations giving $5,851,582 in grants to SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY, 41 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $2,281,550 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New Hampshire. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Squam Lakes Conservation Society →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 54 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing