Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS (California) is funded by 69 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $71,505,638 in grants to it, the largest being Salesforcecom Foundation ($33,500,000). 35 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 2,198 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,198 education nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
98% of SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (26% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $928k → $5.1M on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
18 of 69 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 21% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 69 funders by total. Association, not causation.
SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 47% of grant income and the top three 64%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 73% · 2018 67% · 2019 45% · 2020 41% · 2021 64% · 2022 61% · 2023 49% · 2024 79% · 2025 99% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
28% of SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 51% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS is locally rooted: 89% of its grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 69 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
98% of spending goes to programs.
44%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 1 related entity
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 69funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing