· Public charity
Tipping Point Community
We build community to advance the most promising poverty-fighting solutions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k21 grants · $504k
- $50k–250k36 grants · $4.3M
- $250k+51 grants · $21M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES | $2,450,000 |
| REGENTS OF UCSF | $945,000 |
| FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH | $850,000 |
| JOBTRAIN | $800,882 |
| INSTITUTE ON AGING | $750,000 |
| LIFEMOVES | $600,000 |
| JVS | $540,000 |
| COLLEGE TRACK | $467,500 |
| LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES | $465,000 |
| YEAR UP | $450,000 |
| MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY | $450,000 |
| BAY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES | $450,000 |
| CANAL ALLIANCE | $440,000 |
| LIFE LEARNING ACADEMY | $421,150 |
| BEYOND 12 | $420,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $45.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
140 repeat relationships — 68 still active in FY2025, 72 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LSLarkin Street Youth Services9× · 2017–2025 · $8.0M · revenue +90%
- FPFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH9× · 2017–2025 · $7.0M · revenue +78%
- CFCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES9× · 2017–2025 · $6.5M · revenue +283%
Funded once
- RCROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SANTA ROSAone grant, 2018 · $5.8M
- RHROBIN HOOD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $5.0M · revenue +19%
- SRSANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERSone grant, 2018 · $4.3M · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.
The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…
San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…
SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…
For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…
Our mission at housing trust silicon valley, is to use transformative housing finance and public and private partnerships to create more equitable and affordable communities.
To partner with the community to eliminate poverty.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Making Waves Foundation Inc Aka Making Waves Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
327 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 327 of the 353 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRILLIANT CORNERS ↗
- Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
- Who funds FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds KIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds JOBTRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds RUBICON PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds CALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds ROCKETSHIP EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Bay Area Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds ON THE MOVE ↗
- Who funds Homeless Prenatal Program Inc ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds JEWISH VOCATIONAL & CAREER COUNSELING SERVICE ↗
- Who funds BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds LA LUZ CENTER ↗
- Who funds John Burton Advocates for Youth ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO STATE ↗
- Who funds ALIADOS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY JUNCTION INC ↗
- Who funds NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds Life Learning Academy ↗
- Who funds PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds PARENTCHILD INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · East Bay Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Bothin Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Stupski Foundation · The California Endowment
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tipping Point Community funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Enterprise Community Loan Fund Inc — 18% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.