· Private foundation
Meyer Memorial Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k70 grants · $134k
- $10k–50k54 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k217 grants · $29M
- $250k+47 grants · $15M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - MEYER MEMORIAL TRUST DONOR ADVISED FUND | $900,000 |
| OREGON WORKER RELIEF | $500,000 |
| SEEDING JUSTICE | $500,000 |
| COALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR | $451,000 |
| CENTER FOR INTERCULTURAL ORGANIZING | $450,743 |
| BLACK PARENT INITIATIVE | $400,000 |
| LATINO NETWORK | $355,585 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER | $354,250 |
| OREGON NATIVE AMERICAN CHAMBER | $350,000 |
| NORTHWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION FUND II | $350,000 |
| TIDES FOUNDATION | $330,000 |
| WILLAMETTE VALLEY LAW PROJECT | $325,500 |
| APANO COMMUNITIES UNITED FUND | $310,250 |
| CAPACES LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE | $300,250 |
| WILLAMETTE VALLEY LAW PROJECT | $300,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $22.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of Meyer Memorial Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in OR; read by stated purpose it is 88% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
686 repeat relationships — 255 still active in FY2025, 431 since wound down; 71 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER8× · 2018–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +158%
Latino Network8× · 2018–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +256%- CLCAPACES LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE8× · 2018–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +468% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
- CFCenter for Intercultural OrganizingUnite Oregonone grant, 2023 · $491k
CASCADIA HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $376k · revenue +54%- PIPRISMID INCone grant, 2024 · $375k · revenue 0% · 51% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon
To ensure economic prosperity in the portland region by providing strong leadership, partnership, and programs that encourage business growth and vitality.
To accelerate inclusive economic prosperity in lane county, oregon
The council is organized to foster partnerships for clean water, healthy streams, and abundant fisheries in the Clackamas Watershed
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
Advocate for policies that protect and promote healthy and health equity for all people in oregon and provide learning, collaboration and leadership opportunities for public health professionals and the broader community.
To increase the economic well-being and quality of life for all citizens of the region; to coordinate provincial, territorial, and state policies throughout the region; to identify and promote "models of success and to serve as a conduit…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 1000 Friends of Oregon and the most unlike its peers is Canines for Class. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
931 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 931 of the 1,155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SEEDING JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Verde Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Latino Network ↗
- Who funds CAPACES LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR INTERCULTURAL ORGANIZING ↗
- Who funds COALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds SELF ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HEALTH FOUNDATION FUND II ↗
- Who funds BLACK UNITED FUND OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds APANO COMMUNITIES UNITED FUND ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC ↗
- Who funds THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds ALBINA VISION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILLAMETTE VALLEY LAW PROJECT DBA PCUN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Columbia-Willamette ↗
- Who funds WESTERN STATES CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST NATIVE CHAMBER ↗
- Who funds CAUSA OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds ECOTRUST ↗
- Who funds FARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds REAP INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE BLACK FUTURES ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRATION COUNSELING SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds Black Parent Initiative ↗
- Who funds THE NEXT DOOR INC ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds AFFILIATED TRIBES OF NORTHWEST INDIANS ↗
- Who funds STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND OPPORTUNITIES INDUST CENTER ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds KAIROSPDX ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATIONS FOR A BETTER OREGON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Collins Foundation · Seeding Justice · Careoregon Inc · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Juan Young Trust · Ronald W Naito Md Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Jackson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Meyer Memorial Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Worker Relief — 100% of income from government
- Bonneville Environmental Foundation — 100% of income from government
- Lomakatsi Restoration Project — 100% of income from government
- Deschutes River Conservancy — 100% of income from government
- Friends of Trees — 100% of income from government
- Elso Inc — 100% of income from government
- Community Alliance of Tenants — 100% of income from government
- Luckiamute Watershed Council — 100% of income from government
- Black Educational Achievement Movement — 100% of income from government
- Maxville Heritage Interpretive Center — 100% of income from government
- Wallowa Resources Inc — 100% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Child and Family Council Inc — 92% of income from government
- Ayco — 89% of income from government
- Northwest Health Foundation Fund Ii — 81% of income from government
- Salemkeizer Coalition for Equality — 77% of income from government
- Willamette Partnership — 76% of income from government
- Fair Housing Council of Oregon — 73% of income from government
- Neighborimpact — 68% of income from government
- Yamhill Community Action Partnership — 61% of income from government
- Northwest Coastal Housing — 58% of income from government
- Hacienda Community Development Corporation — 48% of income from government
- Reap Inc — 46% of income from government
- Oregon Tradeswomen Inc — 46% of income from government
- Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
- Oregon Latino Health Coalition — 43% of income from government
- Willamette Riverkeeper — 42% of income from government
- Neighborhood Partnerships Inc — 40% of income from government
- Long Tom Watershed Council — 39% of income from government
- The Next Door Inc — 39% of income from government
- Williams & Russell Cdc — 38% of income from government
- Portland Opportunities Indust Center — 38% of income from government
- Portland Community Reinvestment Initiatives Inc — 36% of income from government
- Bridge Meadows — 36% of income from government
- Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- United Way of Lane County — 31% of income from government
- Partners for a Hunger Free Oregon — 31% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 29% of income from government
- Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians Economic Development Corporation — 28% of income from government
- Samoa Pacific Development Corporation — 28% of income from government
- Warm Springs Community Action Team — 28% of income from government
- Elevate Oregon — 28% of income from government
- Center for Intercultural Organizing — 28% of income from government
- Oregon Justice Resource Center — 26% of income from government
- United Way of the Columbia-Willamette — 25% of income from government
- College Dreams Inc — 23% of income from government
- Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Capaces Leadership Institute — 20% of income from government
- Immigration Counseling Service Inc — 20% of income from government
- Kairospdx — 19% of income from government
- The Coalition of Oregon Land Trusts — 18% of income from government
- Asian Health & Service Center Inc — 18% of income from government
- Willamette Valley Law Project Dba Pcun Foundation — 18% of income from government
- African American Alliance for Homeownership — 17% of income from government
- Human Solutions Inc Dba Our Just Future — 17% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- Holla School — 15% of income from government
- Coalition of Communities of Color — 15% of income from government
- Pbdg Foundation — 14% of income from government
- Self Enhancement Inc — 14% of income from government
- Ecotrust — 14% of income from government
- El Programa Hispano Catolico — 13% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
- Beyond Toxics — 13% of income from government
- Voz Workers Rights Education Project — 12% of income from government
- Umpqua Community Development Corp — 12% of income from government
- Red Lodge Transition Services — 12% of income from government
- VertueLab — 12% of income from government
- Latino Community Association — 11% of income from government
- Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc — 11% of income from government
- Proud Ground — 11% of income from government
- Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians — 10% of income from government
- Oregon Natural Desert Association — 9% of income from government
- Sponsors Inc — 8% of income from government
- Familias en Accion — 8% of income from government
- Bienestar Inc — 8% of income from government
- Rogue Climate — 7% of income from government
- Farmworker Housing Development Corporation — 7% of income from government
- Northwest Pilot Project — 6% of income from government
- Age Us — 6% of income from government
- Nonprofit Association of Oregon — 6% of income from government
- Portland Institute for Contemporary Art — 5% of income from government
- Portland Community College Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- Sustainable Northwest — 5% of income from government
- Micro Enterprise Services of Oregon — 5% of income from government
- The Contingent — 5% of income from government
- Community and Shelter Assistance Corp — 5% of income from government
- Open School Inc — 5% of income from government
- Friends of the Children-Portland — 5% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
- Join — 4% of income from government
- Housing Development Center — 3% of income from government
- Verde Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cascadia Health — 3% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Squareone Villages — 2% of income from government
- Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program — 2% of income from government
- Lewis & Clark College — 2% of income from government
- Serendipity Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild — 2% of income from government
- Rose Community Development Corporat — 1% of income from government
- Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- All Ages Music Portland dba Friends of Noise — 1% of income from government
- Northwest Housing Alternatives — 1% of income from government
- Black United Fund of Oregon — 1% of income from government
- Columbia Riverkeeper — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Womens Foundation of Oregon — 0% of income from government
- Network for Oregon Affordable Housing — 0% of income from government
- The Campbell Institute — 0% of income from government
- Community Energy Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- National Indian Child Welfare Association — 0% of income from government
- Basic Rights Education Fund — 0% of income from government
- Centro Cultural of Washington County — 0% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Seeding Justice — 0% of income from government
- Portland State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Meyer Memorial Trust?
Find your warmest path to Meyer Memorial Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.