Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT

PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT (Oregon) receives grants from 26 organizations whose IRS filings report $257,501 to it, the largest being THE ALBERTSONS COMPANIES FOUNDATION ($88,500). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$336k
Funders on record
26
Grants received
$258k
Net assets
$10k
8/26 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 34%
01What it does

What Portland Fruit Tree Project does

Mission

To increase equitable access to healthful food and strengthen communities by empowering neighbors to share in the harvest and care of city-grown produce.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Portland Fruit Tree Project another record year in 2024, harvesting 108 times and over 15,000 lbs of fruit that went to communities experiencing food insecurity. The organization also provided tree care for services for more households than in any past year and deepened the care provided to five community orchard spaces resulting in healthier and more productive trees around the region. With support from a partnership with Oregon State University Technical Assistance, we hosted 12 paid teen interns in a seasonal orchard care program where they learned work skills as well as how to tend fruit trees and use the fruit produced. For many, this was their first paid work experience. All of the participants lived in, or went to school in, East Portland - a region with lower tree canopy, more food deserts, and fewer opportunities for young people to find employment.

    $282,884 spentof which $31,723 as grants$56,325 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $282,884.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($258k) Expenses 100 ($231k) Net assets 100 ($118k)2022 Revenue 125 ($322k) Expenses 156 ($359k) Net assets 69 ($81k)2023 Revenue 149 ($385k) Expenses 185 ($427k) Net assets 33 ($39k)2024 Revenue 130 ($336k) Expenses 158 ($364k) Net assets 9 ($10k)
2021202220232024
Revenue (130)Expenses (158)Net assets (9)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $118k to $81k (−31%).

$118k
$81k
$46k
$53k
2021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 15% · 2022 32% · 2023 46% · 2024 18%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$27k
’21
−$37k
’22
−$42k
’23
−$29k
’24
1.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Heather Keisler Fornes

Executive Director

Board chair

Kathy Kornei

Chair, Board Member

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

2021202220232024
Listed1111159
Joined·+6+6+1
No longer listed·627
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose $4k → $39k.

4 of 26 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 17% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 34% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

55% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT.

34%
largest funder
52%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 63% · 2018 100% · 2020 85% · 2021 44% · 2022 68% · 2023 26% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

17% of PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 31% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT draws 66% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon, across 7 states in all.

WI
OR
OH
PA
CA
DE
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’20
’21
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $43k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

78% of spending goes to programs.

Program 78%Management 9%Fundraising 13%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

90%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT?
PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT (Oregon) receives grants from 26 organizations whose IRS filings report $257,501 to it, the largest being THE ALBERTSONS COMPANIES FOUNDATION ($88,500). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT have?
IRS filings report 26 organizations giving $257,501 in grants to PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT?
THE ALBERTSONS COMPANIES FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $88,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Portland Fruit Tree Project →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 26 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing