Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION

NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION (Oregon) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,997,697 to it, the largest being NOVO FOUNDATION ($3,643,333). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$4.3M
Funders on record
24
Grants received
$9.0M
Net assets
$-710457
11/24 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What National Florence Crittenton Mission does

Mission

Justice and joy national collaborative employs a robust mix of tools to advance justice for girls and gender-expansive young people. We center the lived experience of girls and gender-expansive young people(see schedule o for continuation)of color because of the compounding impact of the multiple forms of oppression they face.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Reducing risk for girls in the juvenile justice system training and technical assistance, funded by the u.s. Department of justice's (doj's) office of juvenile justice and delinquency prevention, provides training and technical assistance to project sites as they implement strategies to support girls and risk for girls that are in the juvenile justice system. Njrpe (new jersey's rape prevention and education initiative)the new jersey department of children and families, division on women (njdcf-dow), recognize that the prevalence of sexual violence is a health epidemic which transcends race, age, gender, sex, religion, and socio-economic status. As such, the state has committed funds to specifically address the statewide prevention of sexual violence at both the individual/relational and community levels of the socio-ecological model. National crittenton was chosen to implement an evidence based/informed curriculum and a community action plan, which seeks to decrease risk and increase protective factors at the community level.

    $1,499,985 spentof which $12,000 as grants
    46% of program spending
  2. Educationnational crittenton worked with crittenton agencies, survivors of violence and neglect. And partner organizations to provide education, resources, and information to decision makers, influencers, and funders to increase their understanding of the needs and potential of girls and young women who are survivors of abuse and violence, with a specific focus on girls of color. This included communicating the need for the gender and culturally responsive, trauma informed, strength-based services they need to heal and thrive. Girls @ the margin national alliancewith over 12 years of national organizing since its inception in 2010, g@tm continues today to support relationship building and collective action among partners focused on eradicating the oppressions experienced by cis and trans girls, and gender-expansive young people. Founded by national crittenton and rights4girls, and co-steered by these organizations in partnership with the national women's law center, georgetown center on poverty and inequality, and girls inc., the alliance has entered a new phase of re-imagining an alliance that will be of the most benefit to girls and gender-expansive young people. This process…

    $886,371 spent$7,606 earned by the program
    27% of program spending
  3. Envisioning new structures fellowship is a collective of girls, young women, and gender-expansive young people of color (14-25 years old) who are committed to advancing their leadership and safety and healing in their communities. During the fellowship they engaged in research training, critical dialogues, and collaborative opportunities to strengthen their leadership and prepare them to design and implement youth participatory action research (ypar) projects within their communities. Research focused on envisioning new structures that better support the mental health needs of girls and gender-expansive young people of color by reducing their exposure to genderbased violence in all its forms.

    $839,900 spent$28,489 earned by the program
    26% of program spending
  4. Fixing democracy (fd) and the rapid response education fund (rref) created to support young people in mobilizing their peers to the ballot box and to support them in igniting their long-term civic involvement. Youth leaders were engaged in every step of the project working to ensure that the perspective of genz young people of color grounded each step of the project. Fifteen virtual and in person focus groups were conducted to gain insight on their views of the state of democracy and to gain insight on effective message development to reach them.

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,226,256.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.2M) Expenses 100 ($1.9M) Net assets 100 ($2.1M)2018 Revenue 74 ($1.7M) Expenses 115 ($2.2M) Net assets 68 ($1.4M)2019 Revenue 183 ($4.1M) Expenses 155 ($3.0M) Net assets 126 ($2.7M)2020 Revenue 47 ($1.0M) Expenses 139 ($2.6M) Net assets 51 ($1.1M)2021 Revenue 265 ($5.9M) Expenses 121 ($2.3M) Net assets 221 ($4.7M)2022 Revenue 62 ($1.4M) Expenses 201 ($3.8M) Net assets 102 ($2.2M)2023 Revenue 66 ($1.5M) Expenses 228 ($4.4M) Net assets -35 ($-739949)2024 Revenue 192 ($4.3M) Expenses 219 ($4.2M) Net assets -34 ($-710457)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (192)Expenses (219)Net assets (-34)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $1.6M to $4.9M (+201%).

$2.5M
$1.6M
$2.9M
$1.6M
$4.9M
$2.8M
$646k
$641k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 23% · 2018 43% · 2019 8% · 2020 17% · 2021 12% · 2022 27% · 2023 62% · 2024 27%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$309k
’17
−$541k
’18
$1.1M
’19
−$1.6M
’20
$3.6M
’21
−$2.5M
’22
−$2.9M
’23
$61k
’24
0.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Linda Lausell Bryant

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1212111316191818
Joined·+0+2+2+3+3+2+2
No longer listed·0300032
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 9 funders, grant income rose $3k → $470k.

7 of 24 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 12% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 40% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

40%
largest funder
75%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 83% · 2018 84% · 2019 92% · 2020 68% · 2021 81% · 2022 36% · 2023 53% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

47% of NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 46% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon, across 13 states in all.

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
CA
VA
MD
DE
DC
MS
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION has grown faster than half of the 11,263 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin1% · below the median
Months of reserve0.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,263 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $4.0M on record.

Federal$4.0M
grants $4.0Mcontracts $0
17
18
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of Justice$4.0M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 20%Fundraising 3%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

66%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 40 states

AK
ME
NH
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION?
NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION (Oregon) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,997,697 to it, the largest being NOVO FOUNDATION ($3,643,333). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION have?
IRS filings report 24 organizations giving $8,997,697 in grants to NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION?
NOVO FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $3,643,333 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NATIONAL FLORENCE CRITTENTON MISSION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 24 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing