Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Washington · Nonprofit

RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM

RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $145,000 to it, the largest being Meyer Memorial Trust ($135,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$3k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$145k
Grants received
$96k
Net assets
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 100%

Against its field

RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Months of reserve17.4mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−35% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,054 environment nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($108k) Expenses 100 ($24k) Net assets 100 ($84k)2018 Revenue 46 ($50k) Expenses 5 ($1k) Net assets 158 ($133k)2019 Revenue 42 ($45k) Expenses 175 ($43k) Net assets 161 ($135k)2021 Revenue 37 ($40k) Expenses 52 ($13k) Net assets 173 ($146k)2022 Revenue 1 ($1k) Expenses 66 ($16k) Net assets 156 ($131k)2023 Revenue 3 ($3k) Expenses 86 ($21k) Net assets 135 ($113k)2024 Revenue 3 ($3k) Expenses 60 ($15k) Net assets 121 ($101k)2025 Revenue 3 ($3k) Expenses 36 ($9k) Net assets 114 ($96k)
'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (3)Expenses (36)Net assets (114)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 90%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (92% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,973 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

$84k
17
$49k
18
$2k
19
21
22
23
24
25
17
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $10k → $40k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'21
total
funders
1
1
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)7% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM leans on a few funders — its largest provides 93% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

93%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2021 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, across 1 state in all.

OR

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
21
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $10k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $6k on record.

Federal$6k
grants $0contracts $6k
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$6k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM?
RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $145,000 to it, the largest being Meyer Memorial Trust ($135,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $145,000 in grants to RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM?
Meyer Memorial Trust is the largest funder on record, with $135,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RITTER LAND MANAGEMENT TEAM find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing