Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

BARK

BARK (Oregon) receives grants from 31 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,522,194 to it, the largest being WILBURFORCE FOUNDATION ($205,000). 20 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$834k
Funders on record
31
Grants received
$1.5M
Net assets
$458k
20/31 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 64%
01What it does

What Bark does

Mission

To transform mt. Hood national forest into a place where natural processes prevail, where wildlife thrives and where local communities have a social, cultural, and economic investment in its restoration and preservation.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Public education and advocacy - providing free, educational resource materials, guided learning experiences, and facilitated civic engagement activities to inform and support public participation in public lands law and policy by increasing public understanding of forest ecology, restoration science, and environmental justice through in-person and virtual spaces (guided hikes, wetland restoration, and ecological survey activities, virtual and in-person gatherings, web-based learning materials and recorded and in-person training and workshops).

    $379,166 spentof which $983 as grants
    59% of program spending
  2. Restoration - trained and guided 115 volunteers in seasonal beaver habitat surveys restoration plantings, and wetland hydrological capacity monitoring in mt. Hood national forest.

    $139,937 spentof which $333 as grants
    22% of program spending
  3. Forest watch - trained and guided 54 volunteers in conducting on-site ecological surveys and monitoring proposed timber logging and road-building projects on the public lands of mt. Hood national forest, incorporates community-driven science data into public comments submitted organizationally and by thousands of members of the public, through the national environmental policy act and national forest management act.

    $110,618 spentof which $333 as grants
    17% of program spending
  4. Other programs include lobbying and edi.

    $18,150 spent
    3% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $647,871.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($753k) Expenses 100 ($681k) Net assets 100 ($276k)2018 Revenue 99 ($744k) Expenses 106 ($721k) Net assets 108 ($298k)2019 Revenue 102 ($765k) Expenses 111 ($757k) Net assets 111 ($306k)2020 Revenue 129 ($968k) Expenses 106 ($725k) Net assets 199 ($549k)2021 Revenue 129 ($968k) Expenses 124 ($844k) Net assets 244 ($673k)2022 Revenue 49 ($367k) Expenses 57 ($387k) Net assets 221 ($609k)2023 Revenue 103 ($776k) Expenses 119 ($811k) Net assets 208 ($573k)2024 Revenue 112 ($842k) Expenses 127 ($865k) Net assets 199 ($550k)2025 Revenue 111 ($834k) Expenses 136 ($926k) Net assets 166 ($458k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (111)Expenses (136)Net assets (166)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $357k to $572k (+60%).

$304k
$347k
$357k
$572k
$722k
$664k
$644k
$598k
$526k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 0% · 2019 0% · 2020 13% · 2021 0% · 2022 0% · 2023 1% · 2024 2% · 2025 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

102% of BARK’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$72k
’17
$22k
’18
$8k
’19
$243k
’20
$124k
’21
−$20k
’22
−$35k
’23
−$23k
’24
−$93k
’25
5.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1110998810129
Joined·+5+2+2+3+1+2+8+1
No longer listed·63241064
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 15 funders, grant income rose $52k → $202k.

8 of 31 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BARK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 31 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BARK has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 13% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

28% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BARK.

13%
largest funder
35%
top three
~14
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 34% · 2018 36% · 2019 28% · 2020 24% · 2021 20% · 2022 17% · 2023 20% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

71% of BARK's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 65% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

BARK draws 52% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon, across 8 states in all.

WA
MN
WI
MA
OR
NV
PA
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $415k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

BARK's funding base is broadening — from 7 funders to 15 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−11% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding BARK receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $48k on record — $28k federal, $20k state.

Federal$28k
grants $28kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$28k
State$20k
Top programs
  • DISTRIBUTION TO NON-GOVERNMENTS$20k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like BARK

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

70% of spending goes to programs.

Program 70%Management 15%Fundraising 15%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

91%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BARK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BARK?
BARK (Oregon) receives grants from 31 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,522,194 to it, the largest being WILBURFORCE FOUNDATION ($205,000). 20 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BARK have?
IRS filings report 31 organizations giving $1,522,194 in grants to BARK, 20 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BARK?
WILBURFORCE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $205,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BARK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Bark →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 31 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing