Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

DO GOOD MULTNOMAH

DO GOOD MULTNOMAH (Oregon) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,708,966 to it, the largest being United Way of the Columbia-Willamette ($1,707,437). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$30M
Funders on record
17
Grants received
$2.7M
Net assets
$4.2M
8/17 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 16%
01What it does

What Do Good Multnomah does

Mission

The primary purpose of Do Good Multnomah shall be to provide community and support for veterans and other marginalized and underrepresented people impacted by houselessness by providing shelter, transitional housing, and permanent supportive services. Approximately 1,270 individuals experiencing homelessness in the area, including over 400 veterans, are served annually. These programs encompass a variety of housing and shelter models, allowing the organization to adapt to the unique needs of each participant. Instead of adhering to aone-size-fits-all approach, the Do Good Multnomah focuses on delivering personalized, trauma-informed safety nets, creating a haven for those who may not have previously felt comfortable seeking assistance from other providers.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Maintained eleven shelter spaces for displaced veterans and other vulnerable houseless individuals in emergency, congregate, motel, & village settings ranging in size from 19 pods to 100+ beds. Provided trauma informed case management, emergency response to many overdose situations via narcan, two to three meals per day, safe sleeping spaces, and multiple transportation resources and options.

    $20,098,205 spent
    77% of program spending
  2. Assisted in addressing barriers to housing with direct client assistance and identified voucher options and low-income subsidized apartments to place participants in on a permanent basis. Between these programs we saw 556 successful placements out of shelter and into housing or the next best fit for the participant. We also supported 598 participants with client assistance to reduce barriers to housing.

    $4,851,047 spent
    19% of program spending
  3. Maintained permanent supportive housing services to 20 units of veteran housing at clayton mohr commons, 35 units of veteran housing at findley commons, and began supporting 31 units of veteran prefered housing at paul and geneva knauls building and up to 20 units of veteran housing at portsmouth commons, for a total of 106 units of veteran housing.

    $1,176,060 spent
    5% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $26,125,312.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($289k) Expenses 100 ($298k) Net assets 100 ($2k)2019 Revenue 674 ($1.9M) Expenses 504 ($1.5M) Net assets 24375 ($497k)2020 Revenue 1608 ($4.6M) Expenses 1483 ($4.4M) Net assets 34891 ($711k)2021 Revenue 3461 ($10.0M) Expenses 2825 ($8.4M) Net assets 112931 ($2.3M)2022 Revenue 5137 ($15M) Expenses 4709 ($14M) Net assets 134326 ($2.7M)2023 Revenue 5886 ($17M) Expenses 5787 ($17M) Net assets 162524 ($3.3M)2024 Revenue 9170 ($26M) Expenses 8778 ($26M) Net assets 176653 ($3.6M)2025 Revenue 10374 ($30M) Expenses 9861 ($29M) Net assets 205923 ($4.2M)
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (10374)Expenses (9861)Net assets (205923)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $1.5M to $6.9M (+365%).

$2k
$535k
$1.5M
$6.9M
$3.4M
$5.0M
$6.3M
$8.7M
'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 93% · 2019 15% · 2020 83% · 2021 88% · 2022 93% · 2023 96% · 2024 98% · 2025 94%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of DO GOOD MULTNOMAH’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (13% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 881 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$10k
’17
$441k
’19
$217k
’20
$1.6M
’21
$782k
’22
−$269k
’23
$288k
’24
$532k
’25
0.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Daniel Hovanas

CEO

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2022 and FY2023 filings.

'17'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed447816121114
Joined··+5+4+8+7+1+4
No longer listed··2301121
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 5 funders, grant income rose $1k → $64k.

5 of 17 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of DO GOOD MULTNOMAH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

DO GOOD MULTNOMAH leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

87% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund DO GOOD MULTNOMAH.

63%
largest funder
89%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 99% · 2020 65% · 2021 95% · 2022 35% · 2023 42% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of DO GOOD MULTNOMAH's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 47% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

95% of DO GOOD MULTNOMAH's grant income comes from Oregon funders.

NY
MA
OR
NE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $99k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

DO GOOD MULTNOMAH has grown faster than three-quarters of the 449 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.

Operating margin2% · below the median
Months of reserve0.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)79% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 449 housing & shelter nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding DO GOOD MULTNOMAH receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.6M on record — $1.6M federal, $1.0M state.

Federal$1.6M
grants $1.6Mcontracts $0
23
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$1.6M
State$1.0M
22
23
24
25
Top programs
  • DISTRIBUTION TO NON-PROFIT ORG$549k
  • LOANS MADE-OTHER$300k
  • DISTRIBUTION TO NON-GOVERNMENTS$163k
  • OTHER SPECIAL PAYMENTS$2k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like DO GOOD MULTNOMAH

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 10%Fundraising 1%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Part of a family of 4 related entities

  • Dgm 146th LLC · disregarded
  • Dgm Kenton Recovery LLC · disregarded
  • 146th Apartments East-West LP · partnership
  • Findley Commons LLC · partnership

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for DO GOOD MULTNOMAH: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds DO GOOD MULTNOMAH?
DO GOOD MULTNOMAH (Oregon) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,708,966 to it, the largest being United Way of the Columbia-Willamette ($1,707,437). 8 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does DO GOOD MULTNOMAH have?
IRS filings report 17 organizations giving $2,708,966 in grants to DO GOOD MULTNOMAH, 8 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of DO GOOD MULTNOMAH?
United Way of the Columbia-Willamette is the largest funder on record, with $1,707,437 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like DO GOOD MULTNOMAH find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Do Good Multnomah →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 17 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing