Loading…
Loading…
Virginia · Nonprofit
HEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM (Virginia) is funded by 66 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $39,368,086 in grants to it, the largest being The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ($4,933,823). 35 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
HEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM is better cushioned than half of the 1,995 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,995 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 9%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
86% of HEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$280k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $3.8M and 11 in 2017.
16 of 66 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 22% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of HEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 66 funders by total. Association, not causation.
HEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 13% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 32% · 2018 19% · 2019 40% · 2020 28% · 2021 37% · 2022 22% · 2023 26% · 2024 22% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
22% of HEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 53% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
HEALTH CARE WITHOUT HARM draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Virginia — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 20 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 66 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $3.1M on record — $3.0M federal, $150k state.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
87% of spending goes to programs.
62%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 10 states
Part of a family of 1 related entity
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 66funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing