· Public charity
Onpoint Community Credit Union
Promote the financial well-being of credit union members through financial products and services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 180 grants below total $13,237,039 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $14,159,180 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $922,141 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $237k
- $10k–50k136 grants · $2.2M
- $50k–250k10 grants · $820k
- $250k+1 grant · $10M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ONPOINT COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION | $10,000,000 |
| GOWEST CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATION | $226,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION | $103,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK | $79,927 |
| YOUTH VILLAGES | $71,000 |
| AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC | $68,808 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OREGON & | $65,000 |
| SCHOOLHOUSE SUPPLIES | $52,545 |
| CASCADE AIDS PROJECT | $52,500 |
| PORTLAND WORKFORCE ALLIANCE | $51,000 |
| CREDIT UNION HOUSE | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $43,000 |
| BLACK UNITED FUND OF OREGON | $40,000 |
| ALBINA VISION TRUST | $40,000 |
| HACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP | $35,450 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
146 repeat relationships — 116 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 60 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $683k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCONPOINT COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $30M · revenue +10% · 100% of their budget
- CMCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK9× · 2017–2025 · $474k · revenue +31%
- GFGOWEST FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $365k · revenue +519%
Funded once
FinAbilityone grant, 2024 · $130k- BIBANZAI INCone grant, 2021 · $71k
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena
To ensure economic prosperity in the portland region by providing strong leadership, partnership, and programs that encourage business growth and vitality.
Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon
Housing oregon strengthens the collective voice and capacity of mission-driven organizations that share a commitment to housing justice. through our statewide network, we build the affordable housing sector by offering education, resource…
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Next up amplifies the voice and leadership of diverse young people to achieve a more just and equitable oregon.
To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.
Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center and the most unlike its peers is Onpoint Community Credit Union Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 72% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
263 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 263 of the 283 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ONPOINT COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OREGON AND SW WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds GOWEST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCHOOLHOUSE SUPPLIES INC ↗
- Who funds CASCADE AIDS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Portland Workforce Alliance ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds FINANCIAL BEGINNINGS OREGON ↗
- Who funds BLACK UNITED FUND OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds MICRO ENTERPRISE SERVICES OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds DOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Cancer Association ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS COLUMBIA NORTHW ↗
- Who funds SOLVE ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PORTLAND METROPOLITAN AREA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds COALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR ↗
- Who funds RANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Columbia-Willamette ↗
- Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FinAbility ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds Latino Network Action Fund ↗
- Who funds OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST ↗
- Who funds APANO COMMUNITIES UNITED FUND ↗
- Who funds THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds SELF ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Juan Young Trust · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Onpoint Community Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Friends of Trees — 100% of income from government
- Elso Inc — 100% of income from government
- Pueblo Unido Pdx — 100% of income from government
- Morrison Child and Family Services — 91% of income from government
- Pearl Buck Center Incorporated — 76% of income from government
- J Bar J Youth Services Inc — 71% of income from government
- Family and Community Together — 70% of income from government
- Neighborimpact — 68% of income from government
- Community Action Organization — 67% of income from government
- Yamhill Community Action Partnership — 61% of income from government
- Neighborhood House Inc — 53% of income from government
- Hacienda Community Development Corporation — 48% of income from government
- Pride Day Equality Project Incorporated — 47% of income from government
- Se Works Inc — 43% of income from government
- Council On Aging of Central Oregon — 43% of income from government
- Unity Shelter — 42% of income from government
- Neighborhood Partnerships Inc — 40% of income from government
- Educate Ya Inc — 38% of income from government
- Williams & Russell Cdc — 38% of income from government
- Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
- Garten Services Inc — 34% of income from government
- Outside in — 33% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- United Way of Lane County — 31% of income from government
- Transition Projects Inc — 29% of income from government
- Metropolitan Family Service — 29% of income from government
- Holla — 29% of income from government
- Warm Springs Community Action Team — 28% of income from government
- Elevate Oregon — 28% of income from government
- Center for Intercultural Organizing — 28% of income from government
- The Arc of Benton County Inc — 26% of income from government
- United Way of the Columbia-Willamette — 25% of income from government
- Oregon Community Warehouse Inc — 24% of income from government
- Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
- Ophelia's Place — 22% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
- Kairospdx — 19% of income from government
- Portland Housing Center — 19% of income from government
- Looking Glass Community Services — 18% of income from government
- Mt Hood Kiwanis Camp — 18% of income from government
- Sheltercare — 18% of income from government
- The Freshwater Trust — 17% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Bend Inc — 16% of income from government
- Friends of the Children- Central Oregon — 16% of income from government
- Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation — 16% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Corvallis Inc — 16% of income from government
- Coalition of Communities of Color — 15% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East — 14% of income from government
- Self Enhancement Inc — 14% of income from government
- Ecotrust — 14% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
- Xcelerate Women — 13% of income from government
- Latino Community Association — 11% of income from government
- Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc — 11% of income from government
- Columbia Slough Watershed Council Inc — 11% of income from government
- Proud Ground — 11% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
- Nami Oregon — 10% of income from government
- Portland Workforce Alliance — 8% of income from government
- Lifeworks Nw — 8% of income from government
- McKenzie River Trust — 8% of income from government
- Impact Nw — 8% of income from government
- The Shadow Project — 8% of income from government
- Age Us — 6% of income from government
- Nonprofit Association of Oregon — 6% of income from government
- Growing Gardens — 6% of income from government
- Free Geek — 5% of income from government
- Micro Enterprise Services of Oregon — 5% of income from government
- The Contingent — 5% of income from government
- Open School Inc — 5% of income from government
- Marion-Polk Food Share Inc — 5% of income from government
- Food for Lane County — 5% of income from government
- Solve — 5% of income from government
- Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
- Join — 4% of income from government
- Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — 4% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- Trillium Family Services — 2% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Serendipity Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Portland Business Alliance Charitable Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
- Portland Rose Festival Foundation — 1% of income from government
- The Dougy Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Parenting Now — 1% of income from government
- Pear — 1% of income from government
- Black United Fund of Oregon — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Financial Beginnings — 1% of income from government
- Onward Eugene — 1% of income from government
- North Pole Studio — 0% of income from government
- Pride Northwest Inc — 0% of income from government
- Do Good Multnomah — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Business Academy — 0% of income from government
- Bethlehem Inn — 0% of income from government
- Basic Rights Education Fund — 0% of income from government
- Randall Childrens Hospital Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Seeding Justice — 0% of income from government
- Portland State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Onpoint Community Credit Union?
Find your warmest path to Onpoint Community Credit Union through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.