Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

CASCADIA WILDLANDS

CASCADIA WILDLANDS (Oregon) receives grants from 35 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,137,789 to it, the largest being THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($1,413,437). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.6M
Funders on record
35
Grants received
$4.1M
Net assets
$1.8M
22/35 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 70%
01What it does

What Cascadia Wildlands does

Mission

Cascadia Wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. We envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and vibrant communities sustained by the unique landscapes of the cascadia bioregion.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. 1)halting massive mature and old-growth timber sales on public land in western oregon proposed by the bureau of land management through grassroots organizing and litigation campaigns. 1)halting massive mature and old-growth timber sales on public land in western oregon proposed by the bureau of land management through grassroots organizing and litigation campaigns. 2)advancing an amendment to the northwest forest plan that embraces tribal inclusion in forest planning and strengthens safeguards for mature and old-growth forests. 3)successfully urging the oregon state land board to approve a forest management plan for the recently created elliott state research forest that prioritizes carbon storage, salmon and wildlife recovery, and tribal inclusion. 4)launching a lawsuit against the eugene water and electric board for ongoing violations of the endangered species act for failure to provide effective fish passage for bull trout and chinook salmon at trail bridge dam on the mckenzie river. 5)as a founding member of the pacific wolf coalition, successfully advocating for gray wolf recovery, which saw a 15% population increase over the past year in oregon. 6)launching a lawsuit against…

    $1,203,669 spentof which $109,190 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,203,669.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($405k) Expenses 100 ($315k) Net assets 100 ($271k)2018 Revenue 119 ($482k) Expenses 124 ($391k) Net assets 133 ($361k)2019 Revenue 150 ($607k) Expenses 137 ($431k) Net assets 199 ($539k)2021 Revenue 266 ($1.1M) Expenses 185 ($582k) Net assets 426 ($1.2M)2022 Revenue 352 ($1.4M) Expenses 263 ($827k) Net assets 643 ($1.7M)2023 Revenue 263 ($1.1M) Expenses 343 ($1.1M) Net assets 642 ($1.7M)2024 Revenue 248 ($1.0M) Expenses 368 ($1.2M) Net assets 586 ($1.6M)2025 Revenue 399 ($1.6M) Expenses 439 ($1.4M) Net assets 681 ($1.8M)
'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (399)Expenses (439)Net assets (681)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $1.2M to $1.7M (+47%).

$280k
$368k
$546k
$1.2M
$1.7M
$1.7M
$1.6M
$1.9M
'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

79% of CASCADIA WILDLANDS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$91k
’17
$92k
’18
$176k
’19
$498k
’21
$598k
’22
−$14k
’23
−$151k
’24
$236k
’25
14
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'21'22'23'24'25
Listed76677777
Joined·+1+1·+1+0+0+1
No longer listed·21·1001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 15 funders, grant income rose $21k → $661k.

9 of 35 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 49% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CASCADIA WILDLANDS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 35 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CASCADIA WILDLANDS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 60%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

52% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CASCADIA WILDLANDS.

34%
largest funder
60%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 59% · 2018 33% · 2019 26% · 2020 39% · 2021 18% · 2022 52% · 2023 41% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

58% of CASCADIA WILDLANDS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

CASCADIA WILDLANDS draws 58% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon, across 13 states in all.

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
OR
CA
CO
MO
KY
DE
GA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CASCADIA WILDLANDS holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,074 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin15% · above the median
Months of reserve13.8mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)19% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like CASCADIA WILDLANDS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

87% of spending goes to programs.

Program 87%Management 5%Fundraising 8%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

75%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CASCADIA WILDLANDS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CASCADIA WILDLANDS?
CASCADIA WILDLANDS (Oregon) receives grants from 35 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,137,789 to it, the largest being THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($1,413,437). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CASCADIA WILDLANDS have?
IRS filings report 35 organizations giving $4,137,789 in grants to CASCADIA WILDLANDS, 22 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CASCADIA WILDLANDS?
THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,413,437 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CASCADIA WILDLANDS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 35 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing