Montana · Nonprofit
INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL
INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL (Montana) receives grants from 51 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,518,204 to it, the largest being WAVERLEY STREET FOUNDATION ($5,400,000). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Marisla Foundationshared funders
- Iowa Corn Grower's Associationportfolio match
- Native American Agriculture Fundportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 90% · 2018 98% · 2019 72% · 2020 67% · 2021 43% · 2022 44% · 2023 78% · 2024 73%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 18 funders, grant income rose $120k → $1.3M.
10 of 51 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 5% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 51 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 61%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 96% · 2019 100% · 2020 36% · 2021 24% · 2022 58% · 2023 32% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
23% of INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 33% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Montana, across 19 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $639k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 51 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- The Marisla Foundationshared fundersCA · backs 59 organizations that share your funders
- Iowa Corn Grower's Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Native American Agriculture Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- International Citycounty Management Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Asae Research Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- World Wildlife Fund Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ecotrustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Indian Health Boardportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Margaret a Lindberg Fdn Inc Mng Agyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Stephen and Rosamund Forrest Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Swift Foundation co Manchester Capital Managementportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- LP Brown Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government funding INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $125.2M on record.
- Department of Agriculture$125.1M
- National Science Foundation$100k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Montana
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
74% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
85%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL?
- INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL (Montana) receives grants from 51 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,518,204 to it, the largest being WAVERLEY STREET FOUNDATION ($5,400,000). 17 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL have?
- IRS filings report 51 organizations giving $12,518,204 in grants to INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL, 17 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL?
- WAVERLEY STREET FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $5,400,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like INTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Montana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 51funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing