· Private foundation
Ronald W Naito Md Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k191 grants · $4.1M
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE TIDES FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| DOCTORS OF THE WORLD USA | $40,000 |
| RAINFOREST ACTION NETWORK | $40,000 |
| RURAL ORGANIZING PROJECT | $40,000 |
| OREGON ALLIANCE TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ACTION FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| IPAS | $40,000 |
| URGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM | $40,000 |
| OIL CHANGE INTERNATIONAL | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER | $40,000 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN FOOD SOVEREIGNTY ALLIANCE | $40,000 |
| WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC | $40,000 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL OF URBAN INDIAN HEALTH | $40,000 |
| PAI | $40,000 |
| THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON CLEAN TRANSPORTATION | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
150 repeat relationships — 105 still active in FY2024, 45 since wound down; 88 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RORURAL ORGANIZING PROJECT4× · 2021–2024 · $180k · revenue +8%
JACKSON COUNTY SART5× · 2020–2024 · $162k · revenue +17%- OCOil Change International Inc4× · 2020–2024 · $155k · revenue +183%
Funded once
- OPOHSU - PSU SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTHone grant, 2021 · $500k
- OHOREGON HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $400k
- TCTHOUSAND CURRENTSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.
Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon
Next up amplifies the voice and leadership of diverse young people to achieve a more just and equitable oregon.
Open signal's mission is to nurture the change-making power of community media in service of a just and equitable world.
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
Northeast Oregon Network (the Organization) is a non-profit organization established to create a healthier Oregon by reducing barriers for both residents and regional systems that support their health. The Organization fulfills its mission…
To ensure economic prosperity in the portland region by providing strong leadership, partnership, and programs that encourage business growth and vitality.
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink and the most unlike its peers is Bridges Collaborative Care Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
322 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 322 of the 386 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Native American food sovereignty alliance dba NAFSA ↗
- Who funds RURAL ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds JACKSON COUNTY SART ↗
- Who funds Oil Change International Inc ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
- Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR ↗
- Who funds Clackamas Service Center ↗
- Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON CLEAN TRANSPORTATION INC ↗
- Who funds IPAS ↗
- Who funds HABITABLE ↗
- Who funds Womens Foundation of Oregon ↗
- Who funds THE PORTLAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Josephy Center for Arts and Culture ↗
- Who funds Amazon Watch Inc ↗
- Who funds SOLIDARITY INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FOUR RIVERS CULTURAL CENTER AND MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Rainforest Action Network ↗
- Who funds AGE US ↗
- Who funds CAPACES LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Found in Translation Inc ↗
- Who funds Front and Centered ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND STREET MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds Oregon Environmental Council ↗
- Who funds ROGUE VALLEY FARM TO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds OREGON SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Rogue Climate ↗
- Who funds ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION ON TOXICS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Autzen Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · James F & Marion L Miller Foundation · Juan Young Trust · The Reser Family Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · Seeding Justice · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ronald W Naito Md Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pueblo Unido Pdx — 100% of income from government
- Wallowa Resources Inc — 100% of income from government
- Community Vision Inc — 92% of income from government
- Disability Rights Oregon — 84% of income from government
- Youth Rights & Justice — 81% of income from government
- Sexual Assault Resource Center — 81% of income from government
- Salemkeizer Coalition for Equality — 77% of income from government
- Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
- Community Outreach Through Radical Empowerment — 70% of income from government
- Family Building Blocks Inc — 68% of income from government
- The Harbor Inc — 66% of income from government
- Call to Safety — 61% of income from government
- Transponder — 58% of income from government
- Saving Grace — 48% of income from government
- Raices de Bienestar — 41% of income from government
- Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
- Portland Street Medicine — 32% of income from government
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- Partners for a Hunger Free Oregon — 31% of income from government
- Oregon Child Abuse Solutions — 30% of income from government
- Rogue Action Center — 29% of income from government
- Samoa Pacific Development Corporation — 28% of income from government
- Warm Springs Community Action Team — 28% of income from government
- Center for Intercultural Organizing — 28% of income from government
- Abc House Inc — 25% of income from government
- United Way of the Columbia-Willamette — 25% of income from government
- Oregon Coast Aquarium Inc — 24% of income from government
- Liberty House — 23% of income from government
- College Dreams Inc — 23% of income from government
- Young Audiences of Oregon Inc — 23% of income from government
- Maslow Project — 22% of income from government
- Boost Oregon — 22% of income from government
- Capaces Leadership Institute — 20% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Farm to School — 17% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- Coalition of Communities of Color — 15% of income from government
- Lane Arts Council — 14% of income from government
- Jackson County Sart — 14% of income from government
- Oregon Arts Watch — 13% of income from government
- Centerlink Inc — 12% of income from government
- Red Lodge Transition Services — 12% of income from government
- The Portland Playhouse — 11% of income from government
- Latino Community Association — 11% of income from government
- Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center — 11% of income from government
- Oregon Historical Society — 10% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- Music Workshop — 10% of income from government
- Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
- Nurturely — 10% of income from government
- Clackamas Service Center — 9% of income from government
- Familias en Accion — 8% of income from government
- Impact Nw — 8% of income from government
- The Shadow Project — 8% of income from government
- Rogue Climate — 7% of income from government
- Oregon School-Based Health Alliance — 7% of income from government
- Josephy Center for Arts and Culture — 7% of income from government
- The Arts Council of Pendleton Inc — 6% of income from government
- Write Around Portland — 6% of income from government
- Northwest Pilot Project — 6% of income from government
- Age Us — 6% of income from government
- Growing Gardens — 6% of income from government
- Miracle Theatre Group — 6% of income from government
- Japanese American Museum of Oregon — 5% of income from government
- Sustainable Northwest — 5% of income from government
- Playa — 5% of income from government
- North By Northeast Community Health Center — 4% of income from government
- Eugene Springfield Youth Orchestras — 4% of income from government
- Open Hearts Open Minds — 4% of income from government
- Eastern Oregon Regional Arts Council dba Art Center East — 3% of income from government
- Takohachi Inc — 2% of income from government
- Profile Theatre Project — 2% of income from government
- Elkton Community Education Center — 2% of income from government
- Project Access Now — 2% of income from government
- Native Arts and Cultures Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boom Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Independent Publishing Resource Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Black United Fund of Oregon — 1% of income from government
- Columbia Riverkeeper — 1% of income from government
- Caldera — 1% of income from government
- PassinArt - a Theater Company — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- Womens Foundation of Oregon — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Ballet Theatre — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Health Care Interpreters Association — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc — 0% of income from government
- Anthropocene Alliance — 0% of income from government
- Seeding Justice — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ronald W Naito Md Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Ronald W Naito Md Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.