Skip to content

Maryland · Nonprofit

BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC

BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC (Maryland) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,831,540 to it, the largest being The Charles T Bauer Charitable Foundation ($1,400,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$538k
Funders on record
15
Grants received
$3.8M
Net assets
$806k
10/15 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 81%
01What it does

What Biotechnical Institute of Maryland Inc does

Mission

Bti's non-profit mission is to provide tuition-free training and placement assistance to highly motivated, disadvantaged, and under / unemployed individuals with a high school diploma or a graduate equivalent degree, for positions as skilled and reliable lab technicians and to provide a critically needed prepared workforce to support the growth of this economically and scientifically important industry.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. The biotechnical institute of maryland, inc. (bti) was founded in 1998 as a non-profit 501 (c)(3) corporation, to fill a need for specialty scientific training of and placement assistance for entry-level biotechnicians in maryland's rapidly expanding biotechnology industry. The bti laboratory associates program provides tuition-free training in basic laboratory skills to bright, ambitious, under / unemployed residents of baltimore city and the region. A combination of classroom instruction, hands-on training and on-the-job work experience, enables bti's successful graduates to realize employment options, while employers benefit from a stream of ready-for-hire, well-qualified lab technicians. Please see schedule o page 40 for important information on the mission and impact of bti.bti is approved by the maryland higher education commission and recognized throughout the state as an effective workforce training provider. Bti has trained 51 cohorts, celebrates over 700 graduates and has provided specially skilled workers to over 50 maryland employers. Bti's placement rate exceeds 70%. Analysis of the long-term retention rate since 1998 shows approximately 77% of bti graduates are…

    $809,552 spentof which $35,307 as grants$5,170 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $809,552.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($799k) Expenses 100 ($815k) Net assets 100 ($1.1M)2018 Revenue 109 ($871k) Expenses 119 ($971k) Net assets 91 ($1.0M)2019 Revenue 103 ($824k) Expenses 120 ($974k) Net assets 78 ($891k)2020 Revenue 115 ($922k) Expenses 100 ($812k) Net assets 88 ($1.0M)2021 Revenue 91 ($730k) Expenses 115 ($936k) Net assets 70 ($794k)2022 Revenue 145 ($1.2M) Expenses 119 ($968k) Net assets 86 ($984k)2023 Revenue 159 ($1.3M) Expenses 122 ($994k) Net assets 110 ($1.3M)2024 Revenue 67 ($538k) Expenses 122 ($994k) Net assets 71 ($806k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (67)Expenses (122)Net assets (71)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.5M to $968k (−35%).

$1.2M
$1.1M
$912k
$1.1M
$870k
$1.3M
$1.5M
$968k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 44% · 2018 16% · 2019 32% · 2020 16% · 2021 39% · 2022 21% · 2023 34% · 2024 20%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

98% of BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$16k
’17
−$101k
’18
−$150k
’19
$109k
’20
−$206k
’21
$190k
’22
$278k
’23
−$456k
’24
7.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Brandy Carter

Exec. Director

Board chair

John C Weiss Iii

Chair and president

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1215151714141414
Joined·+3+0+4+1+1+0+0
No longer listed·0024100
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $539k → $749k.

3 of 15 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 37% of grant income and the top three 70%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

37%
largest funder
70%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 46% · 2018 93% · 2019 81% · 2020 40% · 2021 30% · 2022 26% · 2023 20% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

75% of BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

94% of BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC's grant income comes from Maryland funders.

MD
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Maryland out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $115k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC is better cushioned than half of the 22,812 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−85% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve7.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−5% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 22,812 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Maryland

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 19%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MD

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC?
BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC (Maryland) receives grants from 15 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,831,540 to it, the largest being The Charles T Bauer Charitable Foundation ($1,400,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC have?
IRS filings report 15 organizations giving $3,831,540 in grants to BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC?
The Charles T Bauer Charitable Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $1,400,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BIOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF MARYLAND INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maryland. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Biotechnical Institute of Maryland →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 15 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing