· Private foundation
Atherton Family Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 235 grants below total $4,233,314 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,282,535 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,049,221 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k75 grants · $335k
- $10k–50k138 grants · $2.5M
- $50k–250k22 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PUNAHOU SCHOOL | $150,000 |
| STRAUB FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| WAHIAWA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH | $100,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S LAW PROJECT OF HAWAII | $90,000 |
| IHS, THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES, INC. | $75,543 |
| PROJECT VISION HAWAII | $75,000 |
| PARTNERS IN CARE | $52,000 |
| WAIANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $51,500 |
| PROJECT HAWAII, INC. | $50,000 |
| BISHOP MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| PA'I FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HAWAII CONSERVATION ALLIANCE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HONPA HONGWANJI HILO BETSUIN | $50,000 |
| WAIMANALO HEALTH CENTER OLA I KA WAI (WATER IS LIFE) | $50,000 |
| HONOLULU ACADEMY OF ARTS | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $746k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
160 repeat relationships — 120 still active in FY2022, 40 since wound down; 109 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWAIANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION3× · 2020–2022 · $269k · revenue +121%
- PSPUNAHOU SCHOOL2× · 2020–2022 · $254k · revenue +40%
VISION TO LEARN2× · 2020–2021 · $250k · revenue +151%
Funded once
- HFHAWAII FARM BUREAU FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $111k
- PVPOLYNESIAN VOYAGING SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +247%
- KAKUA AINA ULU AUAMOgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $91k · revenue +140%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Papahana kuaola's mission is to create quality educational programs focused on environmental restoration and economic sustainability fully integrated with hawaiian knowledge in order to exemplify a lifestyle respectful of kanaka, `aina,…
to rehabilitate, curate, and steward the natural and cultural resources of Kawa to honor the past, benefit the present, and preserve for the future generations of Ka'u, the Island of Hawaii and all humankind.
To re-establish the systems that sustain our community through educational initiatives and land-based practices that cultivate abundance, regenerate responsibilities, and promote collective health and well being.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Education Incubator and the most unlike its peers is Liv Pregnancy and Women's Wellness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
423 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 423 of the 557 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds WAIANAE COMMUNITY RE-DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PUNAHOU SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds VISION TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds IHS THE INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BISHOP MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII CONSERVATION ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN MISSION CHILDREN'S SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HALE KIPA INC ↗
- Who funds MAUI YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS LAW PROJECT OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds HONOLULU MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds PAI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Straub Foundation ↗
- Who funds Kapi'olani Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds POLYNESIAN VOYAGING SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds QUEEN'S NORTH HAWAII COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds HO'OLA NA PUA ↗
- Who funds DIAMOND HEAD THEATRE ↗
- Who funds THE WAHIAWA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds KUA AINA ULU AUAMO ↗
- Who funds HAWAII PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN HAWAII ↗
- Who funds MA KA HANA KA IKE BUILDING PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds HAWAII PREPARATORY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds OAHU RESOURCE CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FUTURE ↗
- Who funds FEEDING HAWAII TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds MALAMA KAUAI ↗
- Who funds PROJECT VISION HAWAII ↗
- Who funds HAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cooke Foundation Limited · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Aloha United Way Inc · McInerny Foundation-- · J Watumull Fund · First Hawaiian Bank Foundation · Kosasa Foundation · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Tradewind Group Foundation · Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Dba Kamehameha Schools · Fred Baldwin Memorial Foundation · First Insurance Company of Hawaii Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Atherton Family Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Atherton Family Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx?
Find your warmest path to Atherton Family Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.